BITS vs. PAVE

Last updated Aug 2, 2026

BITS (Global X Blockchain & Bitcoin Strategy ETF) and PAVE (Global X US Infrastructure Development ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - BITS is a Cryptocurrency fund tracking the NONE, while PAVE is a Infrastructure Equities fund tracking the INDXX U.S. Infrastructure Development Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, BITS returned 31.46%/yr vs 20.94%/yr for PAVE. Their 0.46 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship. BITS charges 0.65%/yr vs 0.47%/yr for PAVE.

Performance

BITS vs. PAVE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Global X Blockchain & Bitcoin Strategy ETF (BITS) and Global X US Infrastructure Development ETF (PAVE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BITS achieves a -11.24% return, which is significantly lower than PAVE's 18.14% return.

BITS

• 1D: -3.36%
• 1M: -0.63%
• 6M: -14.68%
• YTD: -11.24%
• 1Y: -9.04%
• 3Y*: 31.46%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: -2.25%

PAVE

• 1D: 0.46%
• 1M: -1.38%
• 6M: 11.25%
• YTD: 18.14%
• 1Y: 26.28%
• 3Y*: 20.94%
• 5Y*: 17.15%
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 16.01%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
BITS Global X Blockchain & Bitcoin Strategy ETF	$89.94K	$81.82K	$170.18K
PAVE Global X US Infrastructure Development ETF	$109.69M	$125.02M	$111.27M

BITS vs. PAVE - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
BITS Global X Blockchain & Bitcoin Strategy ETF	-11.24%	14.90%	61.84%	212.23%	-75.46%	-28.96%
PAVE Global X US Infrastructure Development ETF	18.14%	19.36%	17.92%	31.01%	-7.17%	0.31%

Correlation

The correlation between BITS and PAVE is 0.43, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.43
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history.	0.44
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 16, 2021	0.46

Return for Risk

BITS vs. PAVE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

BITS

BITS Risk / Return Rank: 8
BITS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7
BITS Sortino Ratio Rank: 9
BITS Omega Ratio Rank: 9
BITS Calmar Ratio Rank: 7
BITS Martin Ratio Rank: 8

PAVE

PAVE Risk / Return Rank: 52
PAVE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 49
PAVE Sortino Ratio Rank: 50
PAVE Omega Ratio Rank: 46
PAVE Calmar Ratio Rank: 59
PAVE Martin Ratio Rank: 57

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

BITS vs. PAVE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X Blockchain & Bitcoin Strategy ETF (BITS) and Global X US Infrastructure Development ETF (PAVE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	BITS	PAVE	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-0.27	1.20	-1.47
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	-0.03	1.76	-1.79
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.00	1.21	-0.21
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.30	2.06	-2.36
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-0.49	6.77	-7.26

BITS vs. PAVE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BITS Sharpe Ratio is -0.27, which is lower than the PAVE Sharpe Ratio of 1.20. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BITS and PAVE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

BITS vs. PAVE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BITS drawdown since its inception was -83.11%, which is greater than PAVE's maximum drawdown of -44.08%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BITS and PAVE.

Drawdown Indicators

	BITS	PAVE	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-83.11%	-44.08%	-39.03%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-48.38%	-11.91%	-36.47%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-48.38%	-26.23%	-22.15%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-26.23%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-41.56%	-5.89%	-35.67%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-42.56%	-6.19%	-36.37%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	29.76%	3.62%	+26.14%

Volatility

BITS vs. PAVE - Volatility Comparison

Global X Blockchain & Bitcoin Strategy ETF (BITS) has a higher volatility of 14.95% compared to Global X US Infrastructure Development ETF (PAVE) at 6.09%. This indicates that BITS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PAVE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	BITS	PAVE	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	14.95%	6.09%	+8.86%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	40.75%	16.61%	+24.14%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	54.36%	20.42%	+33.94%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	60.62%	21.71%	+38.91%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	60.62%	24.37%	+36.25%

BITS vs. PAVE - Expense Ratio Comparison

BITS has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is higher than PAVE's 0.47% expense ratio.

Dividends

BITS vs. PAVE - Dividend Comparison

BITS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 25.64%, more than PAVE's 0.76% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
BITS Global X Blockchain & Bitcoin Strategy ETF	25.64%	22.80%	29.49%	13.69%	0.48%	1.90%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
PAVE Global X US Infrastructure Development ETF	0.76%	0.92%	0.54%	0.68%	0.84%	0.48%	0.44%	0.67%	0.78%	0.30%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both BITS and PAVE in my portfolio?

BITS and PAVE have a correlation of 0.43, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, BITS or PAVE?

BITS has higher volatility (14.95%) compared to PAVE (6.09%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BITS dropped -83.11% vs PAVE's -44.08%.

Which ETF is better, BITS or PAVE?

On 3-year performance, BITS leads with 31.46% vs 20.94% for PAVE. On fees, PAVE is cheaper at 0.47% per year. On volatility, PAVE has been the lower-risk option at 6.09%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, BITS or PAVE?

Over the 3-year period, BITS has performed better with a 31.46% return vs 20.94%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, BITS or PAVE?

PAVE is cheaper with a 0.47% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for BITS.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, BITS or PAVE?

BITS has the higher dividend yield at 25.64%, compared with 0.76% for PAVE.

What is the main difference between BITS and PAVE?

BITS is categorized as Cryptocurrency, while PAVE is Infrastructure Equities. BITS tracks NONE, while PAVE tracks INDXX U.S. Infrastructure Development Index. Their fees differ too: 0.65% for BITS and 0.47% for PAVE.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

PAVE currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.20 vs -0.27), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.