PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BITS vs. IBIT
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

BITS vs. IBIT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Global X Blockchain & Bitcoin Strategy ETF (BITS) and iShares Bitcoin Trust ETF (IBIT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BITS achieves a 7.33% return, which is significantly higher than IBIT's -23.36% return.


BITS

1D
-3.47%
1M
4.62%
YTD
7.33%
6M
-0.80%
1Y
27.34%
3Y*
51.09%
5Y*
10Y*

IBIT

1D
-6.03%
1M
-14.44%
YTD
-23.36%
6M
-26.36%
1Y
-35.90%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BITS vs. IBIT - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
BITS
Global X Blockchain & Bitcoin Strategy ETF
7.33%14.90%62.06%
IBIT
iShares Bitcoin Trust ETF
-23.36%-6.41%99.21%

Correlation

The correlation between BITS and IBIT is 0.85, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.85

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 12, 2024

0.87

The correlation between BITS and IBIT has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.85 to 0.87 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BITS vs. IBIT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BITS
BITS Risk / Return Rank: 1717
Overall Rank
BITS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1717
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BITS Sortino Ratio Rank: 2020
Sortino Ratio Rank
BITS Omega Ratio Rank: 1919
Omega Ratio Rank
BITS Calmar Ratio Rank: 1616
Calmar Ratio Rank
BITS Martin Ratio Rank: 1414
Martin Ratio Rank

IBIT
IBIT Risk / Return Rank: 22
Overall Rank
IBIT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 22
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IBIT Sortino Ratio Rank: 22
Sortino Ratio Rank
IBIT Omega Ratio Rank: 22
Omega Ratio Rank
IBIT Calmar Ratio Rank: 22
Calmar Ratio Rank
IBIT Martin Ratio Rank: 22
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BITS vs. IBIT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X Blockchain & Bitcoin Strategy ETF (BITS) and iShares Bitcoin Trust ETF (IBIT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


BITSIBITDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.52

-0.83

+1.35

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.04

-1.09

+2.13

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.12

0.88

+0.24

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

0.60

-0.73

+1.33

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

1.13

-1.27

+2.40

BITS vs. IBIT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BITS Sharpe Ratio is 0.52, which is higher than the IBIT Sharpe Ratio of -0.83. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BITS and IBIT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


BITSIBITDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.52

-0.83

+1.35

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.03

0.32

-0.29

Drawdowns

BITS vs. IBIT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BITS drawdown since its inception was -83.11%, which is greater than IBIT's maximum drawdown of -49.36%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BITS and IBIT.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BITSIBITDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-83.11%

-49.36%

-33.75%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-48.38%

-49.36%

+0.98%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-48.38%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-29.34%

-46.63%

+17.29%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-42.77%

-15.96%

-26.81%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

25.60%

28.28%

-2.68%

Volatility

BITS vs. IBIT - Volatility Comparison

Global X Blockchain & Bitcoin Strategy ETF (BITS) has a higher volatility of 12.88% compared to iShares Bitcoin Trust ETF (IBIT) at 9.76%. This indicates that BITS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IBIT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BITSIBITDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

12.88%

9.76%

+3.12%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

40.60%

34.85%

+5.75%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

52.47%

43.65%

+8.82%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

60.92%

50.20%

+10.72%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

60.92%

50.20%

+10.72%

BITS vs. IBIT - Expense Ratio Comparison

BITS has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is higher than IBIT's 0.25% expense ratio.


Dividends

BITS vs. IBIT - Dividend Comparison

BITS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 21.24%, while IBIT has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021
BITS
Global X Blockchain & Bitcoin Strategy ETF
21.24%22.80%29.49%13.69%0.48%1.90%
IBIT
iShares Bitcoin Trust ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


BITS and IBIT have a correlation of 0.85, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

BITS has higher volatility (12.88%) compared to IBIT (9.76%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BITS dropped -83.11% vs IBIT's -49.36%.

On 1-year performance, BITS leads with 27.34% vs -35.90% for IBIT. On fees, IBIT is cheaper at 0.25% per year. On volatility, IBIT has been the lower-risk option at 9.76%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, BITS has performed better with a 27.34% return vs -35.90%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

IBIT is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for BITS.

BITS has the higher dividend yield at 21.24%, compared with 0.00% for IBIT.

BITS tracks NONE, while IBIT tracks CME CF Bitcoin Reference Rate - New York Variant. They also come from different issuers: Global X and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.65% for BITS and 0.25% for IBIT.

BITS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.52 vs -0.82), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BITS and IBIT

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer