BITS vs. IBIT
BITS (Global X Blockchain & Bitcoin Strategy ETF) and IBIT (iShares Bitcoin Trust ETF) are both Cryptocurrency funds - BITS tracks the NONE while IBIT tracks the CME CF Bitcoin Reference Rate - New York Variant. Both are passively managed. Over the past year, BITS returned 27.34% vs -35.90% for IBIT. Their correlation of 0.87 suggests significant overlap in exposure. BITS charges 0.65%/yr vs 0.25%/yr for IBIT.
Performance
BITS vs. IBIT - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BITS achieves a 7.33% return, which is significantly higher than IBIT's -23.36% return.
BITS
- 1D
- -3.47%
- 1M
- 4.62%
- YTD
- 7.33%
- 6M
- -0.80%
- 1Y
- 27.34%
- 3Y*
- 51.09%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
IBIT
- 1D
- -6.03%
- 1M
- -14.44%
- YTD
- -23.36%
- 6M
- -26.36%
- 1Y
- -35.90%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
BITS vs. IBIT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
BITS Global X Blockchain & Bitcoin Strategy ETF | 7.33% | 14.90% | 62.06% |
IBIT iShares Bitcoin Trust ETF | -23.36% | -6.41% | 99.21% |
Correlation
The correlation between BITS and IBIT is 0.85, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.85 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 12, 2024 | 0.87 |
The correlation between BITS and IBIT has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.85 to 0.87 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BITS vs. IBIT — Risk / Return Rank
BITS
IBIT
BITS vs. IBIT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X Blockchain & Bitcoin Strategy ETF (BITS) and iShares Bitcoin Trust ETF (IBIT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| BITS | IBIT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.52 | -0.83 | +1.35 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.04 | -1.09 | +2.13 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.12 | 0.88 | +0.24 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.60 | -0.73 | +1.33 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.13 | -1.27 | +2.40 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| BITS | IBIT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.52 | -0.83 | +1.35 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.03 | 0.32 | -0.29 |
Drawdowns
BITS vs. IBIT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BITS drawdown since its inception was -83.11%, which is greater than IBIT's maximum drawdown of -49.36%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BITS and IBIT.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BITS | IBIT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -83.11% | -49.36% | -33.75% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -48.38% | -49.36% | +0.98% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -48.38% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -29.34% | -46.63% | +17.29% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -42.77% | -15.96% | -26.81% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 25.60% | 28.28% | -2.68% |
Volatility
BITS vs. IBIT - Volatility Comparison
Global X Blockchain & Bitcoin Strategy ETF (BITS) has a higher volatility of 12.88% compared to iShares Bitcoin Trust ETF (IBIT) at 9.76%. This indicates that BITS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IBIT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BITS | IBIT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 12.88% | 9.76% | +3.12% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 40.60% | 34.85% | +5.75% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 52.47% | 43.65% | +8.82% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 60.92% | 50.20% | +10.72% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 60.92% | 50.20% | +10.72% |
BITS vs. IBIT - Expense Ratio Comparison
BITS has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is higher than IBIT's 0.25% expense ratio.
Dividends
BITS vs. IBIT - Dividend Comparison
BITS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 21.24%, while IBIT has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BITS Global X Blockchain & Bitcoin Strategy ETF | 21.24% | 22.80% | 29.49% | 13.69% | 0.48% | 1.90% |
IBIT iShares Bitcoin Trust ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
BITS and IBIT have a correlation of 0.85, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
BITS has higher volatility (12.88%) compared to IBIT (9.76%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BITS dropped -83.11% vs IBIT's -49.36%.
On 1-year performance, BITS leads with 27.34% vs -35.90% for IBIT. On fees, IBIT is cheaper at 0.25% per year. On volatility, IBIT has been the lower-risk option at 9.76%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, BITS has performed better with a 27.34% return vs -35.90%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
IBIT is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for BITS.
BITS has the higher dividend yield at 21.24%, compared with 0.00% for IBIT.
BITS tracks NONE, while IBIT tracks CME CF Bitcoin Reference Rate - New York Variant. They also come from different issuers: Global X and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.65% for BITS and 0.25% for IBIT.
BITS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.52 vs -0.82), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for BITS and IBIT
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer