PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BITS vs. BLOK
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

BITS vs. BLOK - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Global X Blockchain & Bitcoin Strategy ETF (BITS) and Amplify Transformational Data Sharing ETF (BLOK). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BITS achieves a 4.17% return, which is significantly lower than BLOK's 16.21% return.


BITS

1D
-2.94%
1M
-1.76%
YTD
4.17%
6M
-6.53%
1Y
19.33%
3Y*
49.59%
5Y*
10Y*

BLOK

1D
-2.62%
1M
7.72%
YTD
16.21%
6M
7.24%
1Y
30.79%
3Y*
51.34%
5Y*
11.96%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BITS vs. BLOK - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
BITS
Global X Blockchain & Bitcoin Strategy ETF
4.17%14.90%61.84%212.23%-75.46%-29.31%
BLOK
Amplify Transformational Data Sharing ETF
16.21%32.64%53.12%99.62%-62.36%-22.75%

Correlation

The correlation between BITS and BLOK is 0.93, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.93

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.91

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 17, 2021

0.91

The correlation between BITS and BLOK has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.91 to 0.93 - a consistent structural relationship.

BITS vs. BLOK - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
BITS
BLOK

Financial Services

72.9%
55.3%

Technology

27.1%
31.8%

Basic Materials

-

-

Communication Services

-

5.2%

Consumer Cyclical

-

6.7%

Consumer Defensive

-

-

Energy

-

-

Healthcare

-

-

Industrials

-

1.0%

Real Estate

-

0.0%

Utilities

-

-

Financial Services

BITS
72.9%
BLOK
55.3%

Technology

BITS
27.1%
BLOK
31.8%

Basic Materials

BITS

-

BLOK

-

Communication Services

BITS

-

BLOK
5.2%

Consumer Cyclical

BITS

-

BLOK
6.7%

Consumer Defensive

BITS

-

BLOK

-

Energy

BITS

-

BLOK

-

Healthcare

BITS

-

BLOK

-

Industrials

BITS

-

BLOK
1.0%

Real Estate

BITS

-

BLOK
0.0%

Utilities

BITS

-

BLOK

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BITS vs. BLOK — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BITS
BITS Risk / Return Rank: 1515
Overall Rank
BITS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1414
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BITS Sortino Ratio Rank: 1717
Sortino Ratio Rank
BITS Omega Ratio Rank: 1616
Omega Ratio Rank
BITS Calmar Ratio Rank: 1414
Calmar Ratio Rank
BITS Martin Ratio Rank: 1212
Martin Ratio Rank

BLOK
BLOK Risk / Return Rank: 2121
Overall Rank
BLOK Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2323
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BLOK Sortino Ratio Rank: 2323
Sortino Ratio Rank
BLOK Omega Ratio Rank: 2323
Omega Ratio Rank
BLOK Calmar Ratio Rank: 2020
Calmar Ratio Rank
BLOK Martin Ratio Rank: 1818
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BITS vs. BLOK - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X Blockchain & Bitcoin Strategy ETF (BITS) and Amplify Transformational Data Sharing ETF (BLOK). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


BITSBLOKDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.44

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.44

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.10

1.16

-0.06

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.40

0.87

-0.47

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

0.75

1.90

-1.15

BITS vs. BLOK - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BITS Sharpe Ratio is 0.37, which is lower than the BLOK Sharpe Ratio of 0.81. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BITS and BLOK, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


BITSBLOKDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.37

0.81

-0.44

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.28

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.02

0.48

-0.47

Drawdowns

BITS vs. BLOK - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BITS drawdown since its inception was -83.11%, which is greater than BLOK's maximum drawdown of -73.33%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BITS and BLOK.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BITSBLOKDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-83.11%

-73.33%

-9.78%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-48.38%

-35.64%

-12.74%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-48.38%

-35.64%

-12.74%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-73.33%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-31.42%

-10.16%

-21.26%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-42.76%

-26.08%

-16.68%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

25.68%

16.23%

+9.45%

Volatility

BITS vs. BLOK - Volatility Comparison

Global X Blockchain & Bitcoin Strategy ETF (BITS) has a higher volatility of 12.83% compared to Amplify Transformational Data Sharing ETF (BLOK) at 10.59%. This indicates that BITS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BLOK based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BITSBLOKDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

12.83%

10.59%

+2.24%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

40.38%

28.55%

+11.83%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

52.55%

38.29%

+14.26%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

60.91%

42.36%

+18.55%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

60.91%

38.97%

+21.94%

BITS vs. BLOK - Expense Ratio Comparison

BITS has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is lower than BLOK's 0.71% expense ratio.


Dividends

BITS vs. BLOK - Dividend Comparison

BITS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 21.88%, more than BLOK's 0.62% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018
BITS
Global X Blockchain & Bitcoin Strategy ETF
21.88%22.80%29.49%13.69%0.48%1.90%0.00%0.00%0.00%
BLOK
Amplify Transformational Data Sharing ETF
0.62%0.72%6.00%1.15%0.00%14.31%1.88%2.05%1.30%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.93, BITS and BLOK move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

BITS has higher volatility (12.83%) compared to BLOK (10.59%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BITS dropped -83.11% vs BLOK's -73.33%.

On 3-year performance, BLOK leads with 51.34% vs 49.59% for BITS. On fees, BITS is cheaper at 0.65% per year. On volatility, BLOK has been the lower-risk option at 10.59%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 3-year period, BLOK has performed better with a 51.34% return vs 49.59%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

BITS is cheaper with a 0.65% expense ratio, compared with 0.71% for BLOK.

BITS has the higher dividend yield at 21.88%, compared with 0.62% for BLOK.

BITS is categorized as Cryptocurrency, while BLOK is Technology Equities. They also come from different issuers: Global X and Amplify. Their fees differ too: 0.65% for BITS and 0.71% for BLOK.

BLOK currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.81 vs 0.37), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BITS and BLOK

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer