BITS vs. BCCC

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

BITS (Global X Blockchain & Bitcoin Strategy ETF) and BCCC (Global X Bitcoin Covered Call ETF) are both Cryptocurrency funds from Global X. BITS is passively managed, while BCCC is actively managed. Their correlation of 0.84 suggests significant overlap in exposure. BITS charges 0.65%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for BCCC.

Performance

BITS vs. BCCC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Global X Blockchain & Bitcoin Strategy ETF (BITS) and Global X Bitcoin Covered Call ETF (BCCC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BITS achieves a 4.17% return, which is significantly higher than BCCC's -21.49% return.

BITS

• 1D: -2.94%
• 1M: -1.76%
• YTD: 4.17%
• 6M: -6.53%
• 1Y: 19.33%
• 3Y*: 49.59%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

BCCC

• 1D: -2.78%
• 1M: -14.90%
• YTD: -21.49%
• 6M: -22.18%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BITS vs. BCCC - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
BITS Global X Blockchain & Bitcoin Strategy ETF	4.17%	12.61%
BCCC Global X Bitcoin Covered Call ETF	-21.49%	-7.14%

Correlation

The correlation between BITS and BCCC is 0.84, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 5, 2025	0.84

Return for Risk

BITS vs. BCCC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BITS

BITS Risk / Return Rank: 15
BITS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 14
BITS Sortino Ratio Rank: 17
BITS Omega Ratio Rank: 16
BITS Calmar Ratio Rank: 14
BITS Martin Ratio Rank: 12

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BITS vs. BCCC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X Blockchain & Bitcoin Strategy ETF (BITS) and Global X Bitcoin Covered Call ETF (BCCC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	BITS	BCCC	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	0.37	—	—
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	0.86	—	—
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.10	—	—
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.40	—	—
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	0.75	—	—
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	BITS	BCCC	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.37	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.02	-0.78	+0.80

Drawdowns

BITS vs. BCCC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BITS drawdown since its inception was -83.11%, which is greater than BCCC's maximum drawdown of -41.62%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BITS and BCCC.

Drawdown Indicators

	BITS	BCCC	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-83.11%	-41.62%	-41.49%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-48.38%	—	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-48.38%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-31.42%	-37.25%	+5.83%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-42.76%	-16.84%	-25.92%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	25.68%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	BITS	BCCC	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	12.83%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	40.38%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	52.55%	35.07%	+17.48%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	60.91%	35.07%	+25.84%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	60.91%	35.07%	+25.84%

BITS vs. BCCC - Expense Ratio Comparison

BITS has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is lower than BCCC's 0.75% expense ratio.

Dividends

BITS vs. BCCC - Dividend Comparison

BITS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 21.88%, less than BCCC's 62.51% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
BCCC Global X Bitcoin Covered Call ETF	62.51%	29.55%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
BITS Global X Blockchain & Bitcoin Strategy ETF	21.88%	22.80%	29.49%	13.69%	0.48%	1.90%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both BITS and BCCC in my portfolio?

BITS and BCCC have a correlation of 0.84, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, BITS or BCCC?

On fees, BITS is cheaper at 0.65% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, BITS or BCCC?

BITS is cheaper with a 0.65% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for BCCC.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, BITS or BCCC?

BCCC has the higher dividend yield at 62.51%, compared with 21.88% for BITS.

What is the main difference between BITS and BCCC?

Their fees differ too: 0.65% for BITS and 0.75% for BCCC.