PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BITQ vs. ROBO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

BITQ vs. ROBO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Bitwise Crypto Industry Innovators ETF (BITQ) and ROBO Global Robotics & Automation Index ETF (ROBO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BITQ achieves a 39.79% return, which is significantly higher than ROBO's 29.33% return.


BITQ

1D
-2.21%
1M
11.04%
YTD
39.79%
6M
21.39%
1Y
60.30%
3Y*
58.56%
5Y*
5.19%
10Y*

ROBO

1D
-0.77%
1M
10.56%
YTD
29.33%
6M
30.40%
1Y
59.43%
3Y*
17.13%
5Y*
7.13%
10Y*
13.65%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BITQ vs. ROBO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
BITQ
Bitwise Crypto Industry Innovators ETF
39.79%18.00%46.97%246.83%-83.86%-7.06%
ROBO
ROBO Global Robotics & Automation Index ETF
29.33%23.71%-1.28%23.74%-33.92%17.50%

Correlation

The correlation between BITQ and ROBO is 0.61, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.61

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.57

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.64

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 13, 2021

0.63

The correlation between BITQ and ROBO has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.57 to 0.64 - a consistent structural relationship.

BITQ vs. ROBO - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
BITQ
ROBO

Financial Services

67.1%
2.2%

Technology

28.1%
41.9%

Consumer Cyclical

4.8%
3.1%

Basic Materials

-

-

Communication Services

-

1.1%

Consumer Defensive

-

1.3%

Energy

-

-

Healthcare

-

4.9%

Industrials

-

46.8%

Real Estate

-

-

Utilities

-

-

Financial Services

BITQ
67.1%
ROBO
2.2%

Technology

BITQ
28.1%
ROBO
41.9%

Consumer Cyclical

BITQ
4.8%
ROBO
3.1%

Basic Materials

BITQ

-

ROBO

-

Communication Services

BITQ

-

ROBO
1.1%

Consumer Defensive

BITQ

-

ROBO
1.3%

Energy

BITQ

-

ROBO

-

Healthcare

BITQ

-

ROBO
4.9%

Industrials

BITQ

-

ROBO
46.8%

Real Estate

BITQ

-

ROBO

-

Utilities

BITQ

-

ROBO

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BITQ vs. ROBO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BITQ
BITQ Risk / Return Rank: 2828
Overall Rank
BITQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2929
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BITQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 3131
Sortino Ratio Rank
BITQ Omega Ratio Rank: 2929
Omega Ratio Rank
BITQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 2727
Calmar Ratio Rank
BITQ Martin Ratio Rank: 2222
Martin Ratio Rank

ROBO
ROBO Risk / Return Rank: 7272
Overall Rank
ROBO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7878
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ROBO Sortino Ratio Rank: 7474
Sortino Ratio Rank
ROBO Omega Ratio Rank: 7070
Omega Ratio Rank
ROBO Calmar Ratio Rank: 6868
Calmar Ratio Rank
ROBO Martin Ratio Rank: 7272
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BITQ vs. ROBO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Bitwise Crypto Industry Innovators ETF (BITQ) and ROBO Global Robotics & Automation Index ETF (ROBO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


BITQROBODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.51

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.72

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.20

1.43

-0.23

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.35

3.44

-2.10

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.84

13.77

-10.94

BITQ vs. ROBO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BITQ Sharpe Ratio is 1.08, which is lower than the ROBO Sharpe Ratio of 2.60. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BITQ and ROBO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


BITQROBODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.08

2.60

-1.51

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.08

0.30

-0.23

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.59

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.07

0.50

-0.43

Drawdowns

BITQ vs. ROBO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BITQ drawdown since its inception was -90.32%, which is greater than ROBO's maximum drawdown of -43.65%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BITQ and ROBO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BITQROBODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-90.32%

-43.65%

-46.67%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-44.99%

-17.35%

-27.64%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-51.22%

-27.92%

-23.30%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-90.32%

-43.65%

-46.67%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-43.65%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-14.06%

-0.77%

-13.29%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-52.80%

-12.93%

-39.87%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

21.32%

4.33%

+16.99%

Volatility

BITQ vs. ROBO - Volatility Comparison

Bitwise Crypto Industry Innovators ETF (BITQ) has a higher volatility of 14.73% compared to ROBO Global Robotics & Automation Index ETF (ROBO) at 7.64%. This indicates that BITQ's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ROBO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BITQROBODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

14.73%

7.64%

+7.09%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

42.74%

18.06%

+24.68%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

56.05%

23.01%

+33.04%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

67.17%

23.63%

+43.54%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

67.23%

23.16%

+44.07%

BITQ vs. ROBO - Expense Ratio Comparison

BITQ has a 0.85% expense ratio, which is lower than ROBO's 0.95% expense ratio.


Dividends

BITQ vs. ROBO - Dividend Comparison

BITQ has not paid dividends to shareholders, while ROBO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.33%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BITQ
Bitwise Crypto Industry Innovators ETF
0.00%0.00%0.90%1.51%0.00%3.12%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
ROBO
ROBO Global Robotics & Automation Index ETF
0.33%0.42%0.55%0.05%0.00%0.18%0.20%0.37%0.37%0.02%0.19%0.28%

Frequently Asked Questions


BITQ and ROBO have a correlation of 0.61, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

BITQ has higher volatility (14.73%) compared to ROBO (7.64%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BITQ dropped -90.32% vs ROBO's -43.65%.

On 5-year performance, ROBO leads with 7.13% vs 5.19% for BITQ. On fees, BITQ is cheaper at 0.85% per year. On volatility, ROBO has been the lower-risk option at 7.64%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, ROBO has performed better with a 7.13% return vs 5.19%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

BITQ is cheaper with a 0.85% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for ROBO.

ROBO has the higher dividend yield at 0.33%, compared with 0.00% for BITQ.

BITQ is categorized as Technology Equities, while ROBO is Robotics. BITQ tracks Bitwise Crypto Innovators 30 Total Return, while ROBO tracks ROBO Global Robotics and Automation TR Index. Their fees differ too: 0.85% for BITQ and 0.95% for ROBO.

ROBO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.60 vs 1.08), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BITQ and ROBO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer