BITQ vs. CIFU

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

BITQ (Bitwise Crypto Industry Innovators ETF) and CIFU (T-REX 2X Long CIFR Daily Target ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - BITQ is a Blockchain fund tracking the Bitwise Crypto Innovators 30 Index, while CIFU is a Leveraged Equities fund actively managed by REX. BITQ is passively managed, while CIFU is actively managed. Their correlation of 0.84 suggests significant overlap in exposure. BITQ charges 0.85%/yr vs 1.50%/yr for CIFU.

Performance

BITQ vs. CIFU - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Bitwise Crypto Industry Innovators ETF (BITQ) and T-REX 2X Long CIFR Daily Target ETF (CIFU). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BITQ achieves a 34.62% return, which is significantly lower than CIFU's 94.41% return.

BITQ

• 1D: -2.61%
• 1M: 0.04%
• YTD: 34.62%
• 6M: 25.61%
• 1Y: 49.39%
• 3Y*: 53.03%
• 5Y*: 4.41%
• 10Y*: —

CIFU

• 1D: -4.06%
• 1M: 42.63%
• YTD: 94.41%
• 6M: 64.26%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BITQ vs. CIFU - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
BITQ Bitwise Crypto Industry Innovators ETF	34.62%	0.55%
CIFU T-REX 2X Long CIFR Daily Target ETF	94.41%	-13.41%

Correlation

The correlation between BITQ and CIFU is 0.84, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 21, 2025	0.84

Return for Risk

BITQ vs. CIFU — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BITQ

BITQ Risk / Return Rank: 25
BITQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 25
BITQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 28
BITQ Omega Ratio Rank: 25
BITQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 24
BITQ Martin Ratio Rank: 20

CIFU

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BITQ vs. CIFU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Bitwise Crypto Industry Innovators ETF (BITQ) and T-REX 2X Long CIFR Daily Target ETF (CIFU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	BITQ	CIFU	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.87	—	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.47	—	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.17	—	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.10	—	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	2.30	—	—

Drawdowns

BITQ vs. CIFU - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BITQ drawdown since its inception was -90.32%, which is greater than CIFU's maximum drawdown of -77.20%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BITQ and CIFU.

Drawdown Indicators

	BITQ	CIFU	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-90.32%	-77.20%	-13.12%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-44.99%	—	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-51.22%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-90.32%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-17.24%	-10.48%	-6.76%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-52.52%	-42.93%	-9.59%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	21.50%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	BITQ	CIFU	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	16.45%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	43.05%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	56.94%	207.07%	-150.13%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	67.32%	207.07%	-139.75%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	67.24%	207.07%	-139.83%

BITQ vs. CIFU - Expense Ratio Comparison

BITQ has a 0.85% expense ratio, which is lower than CIFU's 1.50% expense ratio.

Dividends

BITQ vs. CIFU - Dividend Comparison

Neither BITQ nor CIFU has paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
BITQ Bitwise Crypto Industry Innovators ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.90%	1.51%	0.00%	3.12%
CIFU T-REX 2X Long CIFR Daily Target ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both BITQ and CIFU in my portfolio?

BITQ and CIFU have a correlation of 0.84, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, BITQ or CIFU?

On fees, BITQ is cheaper at 0.85% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, BITQ or CIFU?

BITQ is cheaper with a 0.85% expense ratio, compared with 1.50% for CIFU.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, BITQ or CIFU?

BITQ and CIFU have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

What is the main difference between BITQ and CIFU?

BITQ is categorized as Blockchain, while CIFU is Leveraged Equities. They also come from different issuers: Bitwise and REX. Their fees differ too: 0.85% for BITQ and 1.50% for CIFU.