BITQ vs. AMOM

Last updated Jul 15, 2026

BITQ (Bitwise Crypto Industry Innovators ETF) and AMOM (QRAFT AI-Enhanced U.S. Large Cap Momentum ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - BITQ is a Blockchain fund tracking the Bitwise Crypto Innovators 30 Index, while AMOM is a Momentum fund actively managed by Exchange Traded Concepts. BITQ is passively managed, while AMOM is actively managed. Over the past 5 years, BITQ returned 4.48%/yr vs 11.47%/yr for AMOM. A 0.56 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. BITQ charges 0.85%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for AMOM.

Performance

BITQ vs. AMOM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Bitwise Crypto Industry Innovators ETF (BITQ) and QRAFT AI-Enhanced U.S. Large Cap Momentum ETF (AMOM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BITQ achieves a 18.26% return, which is significantly lower than AMOM's 24.30% return.

BITQ

• 1D: 1.68%
• 1M: -11.99%
• 6M: -0.04%
• YTD: 18.26%
• 1Y: 10.66%
• 3Y*: 31.35%
• 5Y*: 4.48%
• 10Y*: —

AMOM

• 1D: 2.17%
• 1M: -0.77%
• 6M: 19.34%
• YTD: 24.30%
• 1Y: 32.22%
• 3Y*: 23.87%
• 5Y*: 11.47%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BITQ vs. AMOM - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
BITQ Bitwise Crypto Industry Innovators ETF	18.26%	18.00%	46.97%	246.83%	-83.86%	-11.98%
AMOM QRAFT AI-Enhanced U.S. Large Cap Momentum ETF	24.30%	7.69%	35.79%	27.06%	-26.29%	6.26%

Correlation

The correlation between BITQ and AMOM is 0.62, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.62
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.56
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.57
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 12, 2021	0.56

The correlation between BITQ and AMOM has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.56 to 0.62 - a consistent structural relationship.

BITQ vs. AMOM - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	BITQ	AMOM
Financial Services	71.6%	6.2%
Technology	25.5%	50.2%
Consumer Cyclical	2.9%	3.0%
Basic Materials	-	4.6%
Communication Services	-	7.4%
Consumer Defensive	-	5.0%
Energy	-	11.8%
Healthcare	-	7.7%
Industrials	-	21.9%
Real Estate	-	1.9%
Utilities	-	1.1%

Return for Risk

BITQ vs. AMOM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BITQ

BITQ Risk / Return Rank: 13
BITQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 12
BITQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 16
BITQ Omega Ratio Rank: 15
BITQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 12
BITQ Martin Ratio Rank: 12

AMOM

AMOM Risk / Return Rank: 49
AMOM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 43
AMOM Sortino Ratio Rank: 40
AMOM Omega Ratio Rank: 43
AMOM Calmar Ratio Rank: 62
AMOM Martin Ratio Rank: 58

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BITQ vs. AMOM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Bitwise Crypto Industry Innovators ETF (BITQ) and QRAFT AI-Enhanced U.S. Large Cap Momentum ETF (AMOM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	BITQ	AMOM	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.19	1.24	-1.05
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	0.67	1.71	-1.04
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.08	1.23	-0.15
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.24	2.47	-2.23
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	0.49	7.94	-7.45

BITQ vs. AMOM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BITQ Sharpe Ratio is 0.19, which is lower than the AMOM Sharpe Ratio of 1.24. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BITQ and AMOM, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

BITQ vs. AMOM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BITQ drawdown since its inception was -90.32%, which is greater than AMOM's maximum drawdown of -39.68%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BITQ and AMOM.

Drawdown Indicators

	BITQ	AMOM	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-90.32%	-39.68%	-50.64%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-44.99%	-13.10%	-31.89%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-51.22%	-30.26%	-20.96%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-90.32%	-39.68%	-50.64%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-27.30%	-6.21%	-21.09%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-52.23%	-10.71%	-41.52%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	22.02%	4.07%	+17.95%

Volatility

BITQ vs. AMOM - Volatility Comparison

Bitwise Crypto Industry Innovators ETF (BITQ) and QRAFT AI-Enhanced U.S. Large Cap Momentum ETF (AMOM) have volatilities of 12.18% and 12.68%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	BITQ	AMOM	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	12.18%	12.68%	-0.50%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	42.48%	21.98%	+20.50%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	57.13%	26.21%	+30.92%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	67.31%	24.67%	+42.64%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	67.04%	25.42%	+41.62%

BITQ vs. AMOM - Expense Ratio Comparison

BITQ has a 0.85% expense ratio, which is higher than AMOM's 0.75% expense ratio.

Dividends

BITQ vs. AMOM - Dividend Comparison

BITQ has not paid dividends to shareholders, while AMOM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.03%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019
AMOM QRAFT AI-Enhanced U.S. Large Cap Momentum ETF	0.03%	0.09%	0.00%	0.47%	0.72%	0.74%	24.31%	5.51%
BITQ Bitwise Crypto Industry Innovators ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.90%	1.51%	0.00%	3.12%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both BITQ and AMOM in my portfolio?

BITQ and AMOM have a correlation of 0.62, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, BITQ or AMOM?

AMOM has higher volatility (12.68%) compared to BITQ (12.18%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BITQ dropped -90.32% vs AMOM's -39.68%.

Which ETF is better, BITQ or AMOM?

On 5-year performance, AMOM leads with 11.47% vs 4.48% for BITQ. On fees, AMOM is cheaper at 0.75% per year. On volatility, BITQ has been the lower-risk option at 12.18%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, BITQ or AMOM?

Over the 5-year period, AMOM has performed better with a 11.47% return vs 4.48%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, BITQ or AMOM?

AMOM is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 0.85% for BITQ.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, BITQ or AMOM?

AMOM has the higher dividend yield at 0.03%, compared with 0.00% for BITQ.

What is the main difference between BITQ and AMOM?

BITQ is categorized as Blockchain, while AMOM is Momentum. They also come from different issuers: Bitwise and Exchange Traded Concepts. Their fees differ too: 0.85% for BITQ and 0.75% for AMOM.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

AMOM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.24 vs 0.19), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.