BITO vs. FBY

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

BITO (ProShares Bitcoin Strategy ETF) and FBY (YieldMax META Option Income ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - BITO is a Cryptocurrency fund actively managed by ProShares, while FBY is a Derivative Income fund actively managed by YieldMax. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, BITO returned -42.09% vs -17.63% for FBY. At a 0.24 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. BITO charges 0.95%/yr vs 0.99%/yr for FBY.

Performance

BITO vs. FBY - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ProShares Bitcoin Strategy ETF (BITO) and YieldMax META Option Income ETF (FBY). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BITO achieves a -29.93% return, which is significantly lower than FBY's -13.50% return.

BITO

• 1D: -3.31%
• 1M: -18.05%
• YTD: -29.93%
• 6M: -30.03%
• 1Y: -42.09%
• 3Y*: 18.00%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

FBY

• 1D: -0.06%
• 1M: -7.14%
• YTD: -13.50%
• 6M: -13.67%
• 1Y: -17.63%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BITO vs. FBY - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
BITO ProShares Bitcoin Strategy ETF	-29.93%	-11.19%	104.45%	39.63%
FBY YieldMax META Option Income ETF	-13.50%	1.98%	44.42%	17.68%

Correlation

The correlation between BITO and FBY is 0.25, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.25
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 28, 2023	0.24

Return for Risk

BITO vs. FBY — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BITO

BITO Risk / Return Rank: 2
BITO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1
BITO Sortino Ratio Rank: 2
BITO Omega Ratio Rank: 2
BITO Calmar Ratio Rank: 2
BITO Martin Ratio Rank: 2

FBY

FBY Risk / Return Rank: 4
FBY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4
FBY Sortino Ratio Rank: 4
FBY Omega Ratio Rank: 4
FBY Calmar Ratio Rank: 4
FBY Martin Ratio Rank: 3

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BITO vs. FBY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares Bitcoin Strategy ETF (BITO) and YieldMax META Option Income ETF (FBY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	BITO	FBY	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-0.96	-0.60	-0.36
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	-1.38	-0.68	-0.70
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.85	0.91	-0.06
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.80	-0.60	-0.20
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-1.35	-1.22	-0.13

BITO vs. FBY - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BITO Sharpe Ratio is -0.96, which is lower than the FBY Sharpe Ratio of -0.60. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BITO and FBY, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

BITO vs. FBY - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BITO drawdown since its inception was -77.86%, which is greater than FBY's maximum drawdown of -31.53%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BITO and FBY.

Drawdown Indicators

	BITO	FBY	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-77.86%	-31.53%	-46.33%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-53.10%	-29.50%	-23.60%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-53.10%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-51.67%	-25.66%	-26.01%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-36.86%	-8.09%	-28.77%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	31.28%	14.46%	+16.82%

Volatility

BITO vs. FBY - Volatility Comparison

ProShares Bitcoin Strategy ETF (BITO) has a higher volatility of 12.79% compared to YieldMax META Option Income ETF (FBY) at 10.24%. This indicates that BITO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FBY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	BITO	FBY	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	12.79%	10.24%	+2.55%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	34.39%	23.30%	+11.09%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	44.08%	29.60%	+14.48%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	55.02%	28.65%	+26.37%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	55.02%	28.65%	+26.37%

BITO vs. FBY - Expense Ratio Comparison

BITO has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is lower than FBY's 0.99% expense ratio.

Dividends

BITO vs. FBY - Dividend Comparison

BITO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 71.07%, more than FBY's 57.98% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023
BITO ProShares Bitcoin Strategy ETF	71.07%	78.29%	61.59%	15.14%
FBY YieldMax META Option Income ETF	57.98%	55.43%	53.89%	8.31%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both BITO and FBY in my portfolio?

BITO and FBY have a correlation of 0.25, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, BITO or FBY?

BITO has higher volatility (12.79%) compared to FBY (10.24%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BITO dropped -77.86% vs FBY's -31.53%.

Which ETF is better, BITO or FBY?

On 1-year performance, FBY leads with -17.63% vs -42.09% for BITO. On fees, BITO is cheaper at 0.95% per year. On volatility, FBY has been the lower-risk option at 10.24%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, BITO or FBY?

Over the 1-year period, FBY has performed better with a -17.63% return vs -42.09%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, BITO or FBY?

BITO is cheaper with a 0.95% expense ratio, compared with 0.99% for FBY.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, BITO or FBY?

BITO has the higher dividend yield at 71.07%, compared with 57.98% for FBY.

What is the main difference between BITO and FBY?

BITO is categorized as Cryptocurrency, while FBY is Derivative Income. They also come from different issuers: ProShares and YieldMax. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for BITO and 0.99% for FBY.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

FBY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.60 vs -0.96), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.