PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BITK vs. QYLD
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

BITK vs. QYLD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Tuttle Capital Bitcoin 0DTE Covered Call ETF (BITK) and Global X NASDAQ 100 Covered Call ETF (QYLD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BITK achieves a -30.37% return, which is significantly lower than QYLD's 10.96% return.


BITK

1D
0.94%
1M
0.30%
6M
-32.49%
YTD
-30.37%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

QYLD

1D
0.38%
1M
3.65%
6M
9.59%
YTD
10.96%
1Y
24.08%
3Y*
14.41%
5Y*
8.67%
10Y*
9.99%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BITK vs. QYLD - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between BITK and QYLD is 0.47, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 24, 2025

0.47

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BITK vs. QYLD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BITK

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.


QYLD
QYLD Risk / Return Rank: 9292
Overall Rank
QYLD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8989
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QYLD Sortino Ratio Rank: 8989
Sortino Ratio Rank
QYLD Omega Ratio Rank: 9292
Omega Ratio Rank
QYLD Calmar Ratio Rank: 9292
Calmar Ratio Rank
QYLD Martin Ratio Rank: 9696
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BITK vs. QYLD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Tuttle Capital Bitcoin 0DTE Covered Call ETF (BITK) and Global X NASDAQ 100 Covered Call ETF (QYLD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


BITKQYLDDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.50

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.88

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

25.57

BITK vs. QYLD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

BITK vs. QYLD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BITK drawdown since its inception was -57.48%, which is greater than QYLD's maximum drawdown of -24.75%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BITK and QYLD.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BITKQYLDDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-57.48%

-24.75%

-32.73%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-4.97%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-19.06%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-24.61%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-24.75%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-53.75%

0.00%

-53.75%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-37.19%

-3.81%

-33.38%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.95%

Volatility

BITK vs. QYLD - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BITKQYLDDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.62%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.23%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

48.64%

10.40%

+38.24%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

48.64%

14.93%

+33.71%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

48.64%

15.57%

+33.07%

BITK vs. QYLD - Expense Ratio Comparison

BITK has a 0.99% expense ratio, which is higher than QYLD's 0.60% expense ratio.


Dividends

BITK vs. QYLD - Dividend Comparison

BITK's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 49.49%, more than QYLD's 11.36% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BITK
Tuttle Capital Bitcoin 0DTE Covered Call ETF
49.49%23.15%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
QYLD
Global X NASDAQ 100 Covered Call ETF
11.36%11.55%12.50%11.78%13.75%12.85%11.16%9.84%12.44%7.69%9.15%9.42%

Frequently Asked Questions


BITK and QYLD have a correlation of 0.47, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, QYLD is cheaper at 0.60% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

QYLD is cheaper with a 0.60% expense ratio, compared with 0.99% for BITK.

BITK has the higher dividend yield at 49.49%, compared with 11.36% for QYLD.

BITK is categorized as Derivative Income, while QYLD is Nasdaq-100. They also come from different issuers: Tuttle Capital Management and Global X. Their fees differ too: 0.99% for BITK and 0.60% for QYLD.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BITK and QYLD

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer