PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BITI vs. QLD
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

BITI vs. QLD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ProShares Shrt Bitcoin ETF (BITI) and ProShares Ultra QQQ (QLD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

BITI vs. QLD - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
BITI
ProShares Shrt Bitcoin ETF
20.02%-1.76%-62.60%-66.17%-0.06%
QLD
ProShares Ultra QQQ
-11.23%30.36%42.82%117.72%-15.99%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BITI achieves a 20.02% return, which is significantly higher than QLD's -11.23% return.


BITI

1D
-0.46%
1M
0.37%
YTD
20.02%
6M
56.40%
1Y
10.94%
3Y*
-34.13%
5Y*
10Y*

QLD

1D
2.44%
1M
-8.26%
YTD
-11.23%
6M
-9.73%
1Y
38.72%
3Y*
36.50%
5Y*
15.83%
10Y*
29.71%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


BITI vs. QLD - Expense Ratio Comparison

BITI has a 1.03% expense ratio, which is higher than QLD's 0.95% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

BITI vs. QLD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BITI
BITI Risk / Return Rank: 1818
Overall Rank
BITI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1818
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BITI Sortino Ratio Rank: 2222
Sortino Ratio Rank
BITI Omega Ratio Rank: 2020
Omega Ratio Rank
BITI Calmar Ratio Rank: 1515
Calmar Ratio Rank
BITI Martin Ratio Rank: 1414
Martin Ratio Rank

QLD
QLD Risk / Return Rank: 5353
Overall Rank
QLD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4545
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QLD Sortino Ratio Rank: 5454
Sortino Ratio Rank
QLD Omega Ratio Rank: 5353
Omega Ratio Rank
QLD Calmar Ratio Rank: 6262
Calmar Ratio Rank
QLD Martin Ratio Rank: 5252
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BITI vs. QLD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares Shrt Bitcoin ETF (BITI) and ProShares Ultra QQQ (QLD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


BITIQLDDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.24

0.87

-0.62

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

0.66

1.46

-0.80

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.08

1.21

-0.13

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

0.19

1.63

-1.44

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

0.29

5.27

-4.98

BITI vs. QLD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BITI Sharpe Ratio is 0.24, which is lower than the QLD Sharpe Ratio of 0.87. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BITI and QLD, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


BITIQLDDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.24

0.87

-0.62

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.36

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.67

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.75

0.53

-1.28

Correlation

The correlation between BITI and QLD is -0.39. This indicates that the assets' prices tend to move in opposite directions. Negative correlation can be particularly beneficial for diversification and risk management, as one asset may offset the losses of the other during market fluctuations.


Dividends

BITI vs. QLD - Dividend Comparison

BITI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.23%, more than QLD's 0.19% yield.


TTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BITI
ProShares Shrt Bitcoin ETF
8.23%1.60%3.91%3.33%0.06%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
QLD
ProShares Ultra QQQ
0.19%0.17%0.25%0.33%0.31%0.00%0.00%0.13%0.06%0.02%0.21%0.11%

Drawdowns

BITI vs. QLD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BITI drawdown since its inception was -92.16%, which is greater than QLD's maximum drawdown of -83.13%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BITI and QLD.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


BITIQLDDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-92.16%

-83.13%

-9.03%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-39.64%

-25.13%

-14.51%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-63.68%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-63.68%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-86.90%

-18.15%

-68.75%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-67.03%

-18.30%

-48.73%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

25.26%

7.75%

+17.51%

Volatility

BITI vs. QLD - Volatility Comparison

ProShares Shrt Bitcoin ETF (BITI) and ProShares Ultra QQQ (QLD) have volatilities of 13.04% and 13.16%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


BITIQLDDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

13.04%

13.16%

-0.12%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

36.32%

25.67%

+10.65%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

45.20%

44.97%

+0.23%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

53.18%

44.76%

+8.42%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

53.18%

44.47%

+8.71%