BITC vs. HCMDX
BITC (Bitwise Bitcoin Strategy Optimum Roll ETF) and HCMDX (HCM Tactical Growth Fund) are both funds - BITC is a Cryptocurrency fund actively managed by Bitwise, while HCMDX is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund managed by Howard Capital Management. Over the past 3 years, BITC returned 28.25%/yr vs 25.61%/yr for HCMDX. At a 0.25 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. BITC charges 0.88%/yr vs 2.84%/yr for HCMDX.
Performance
BITC vs. HCMDX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BITC achieves a -0.51% return, which is significantly lower than HCMDX's 5.41% return.
BITC
- 1D
- 0.15%
- 1M
- -6.81%
- YTD
- -0.51%
- 6M
- -0.58%
- 1Y
- -17.30%
- 3Y*
- 28.25%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
HCMDX
- 1D
- -0.52%
- 1M
- -4.38%
- YTD
- 5.41%
- 6M
- 2.75%
- 1Y
- 26.12%
- 3Y*
- 25.61%
- 5Y*
- 11.94%
- 10Y*
- 18.86%
BITC vs. HCMDX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
BITC Bitwise Bitcoin Strategy Optimum Roll ETF | -0.51% | -20.46% | 97.86% | 42.71% |
HCMDX HCM Tactical Growth Fund | 5.41% | 16.55% | 49.90% | 29.02% |
Correlation
The correlation between BITC and HCMDX is 0.23, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.23 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.26 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 21, 2023 | 0.25 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BITC vs. HCMDX — Risk / Return Rank
BITC
HCMDX
BITC vs. HCMDX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Bitwise Bitcoin Strategy Optimum Roll ETF (BITC) and HCM Tactical Growth Fund (HCMDX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| BITC | HCMDX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.76 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.33 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.87 | 1.20 | -0.32 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.65 | 1.57 | -2.23 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.91 | 4.19 | -5.10 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
BITC vs. HCMDX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BITC drawdown since its inception was -38.51%, smaller than the maximum HCMDX drawdown of -40.89%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BITC and HCMDX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BITC | HCMDX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -38.51% | -40.89% | +2.38% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -26.51% | -17.00% | -9.51% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -38.51% | -25.96% | -12.55% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -40.89% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -40.89% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -31.62% | -7.20% | -24.42% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -16.55% | -11.38% | -5.17% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 19.08% | 6.38% | +12.70% |
Volatility
BITC vs. HCMDX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Bitwise Bitcoin Strategy Optimum Roll ETF (BITC) is 5.29%, while HCM Tactical Growth Fund (HCMDX) has a volatility of 12.26%. This indicates that BITC experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than HCMDX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BITC | HCMDX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.29% | 12.26% | -6.97% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 19.46% | 18.84% | +0.62% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 25.45% | 24.94% | +0.51% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 46.30% | 24.58% | +21.72% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 46.30% | 24.29% | +22.01% |
BITC vs. HCMDX - Expense Ratio Comparison
BITC has a 0.88% expense ratio, which is lower than HCMDX's 2.84% expense ratio.
Dividends
BITC vs. HCMDX - Dividend Comparison
BITC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.38%, more than HCMDX's 2.83% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BITC Bitwise Bitcoin Strategy Optimum Roll ETF | 3.38% | 3.36% | 42.68% | 5.82% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
HCMDX HCM Tactical Growth Fund | 2.83% | 2.98% | 23.23% | 0.00% | 0.72% | 0.99% | 3.24% | 0.00% | 5.05% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 1.47% |
Frequently Asked Questions
BITC and HCMDX have a correlation of 0.23, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
HCMDX has higher volatility (12.26%) compared to BITC (5.29%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BITC dropped -38.51% vs HCMDX's -40.89%.
HCMDX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.08 vs -0.68), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for BITC and HCMDX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer