BIS vs. BITU
BIS (ProShares UltraShort Nasdaq Biotechnology) and BITU (Proshares Ultra Bitcoin ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - BIS is a Leveraged Equities fund tracking the NASDAQ Biotechnology Index (-200%), while BITU is a Cryptocurrency fund tracking the Bloomberg Bitcoin Index - Benchmark TR Gross. Both are passively managed. Over the past year, BIS returned -49.58% vs -73.07% for BITU. At a correlation of -0.30, they often move in opposite directions. Both charge a 0.95% expense ratio.
Performance
BIS vs. BITU - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BIS achieves a -6.36% return, which is significantly higher than BITU's -52.92% return.
BIS
- 1D
- -3.65%
- 1M
- 2.35%
- YTD
- -6.36%
- 6M
- -4.11%
- 1Y
- -49.58%
- 3Y*
- -21.43%
- 5Y*
- -14.49%
- 10Y*
- -23.34%
BITU
- 1D
- -5.58%
- 1M
- -34.84%
- YTD
- -52.92%
- 6M
- -59.11%
- 1Y
- -73.07%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
BIS vs. BITU - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
BIS ProShares UltraShort Nasdaq Biotechnology | -6.36% | -45.95% | 1.24% |
BITU Proshares Ultra Bitcoin ETF | -52.92% | -37.07% | 37.90% |
Correlation
The correlation between BIS and BITU is -0.33, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.33 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 3, 2024 | -0.30 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BIS vs. BITU — Risk / Return Rank
BIS
BITU
BIS vs. BITU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares UltraShort Nasdaq Biotechnology (BIS) and Proshares Ultra Bitcoin ETF (BITU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| BIS | BITU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.41 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.55 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.78 | 0.84 | -0.06 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.91 | -0.93 | +0.02 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.25 | -1.47 | +0.21 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| BIS | BITU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -1.25 | -0.84 | -0.41 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.33 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | -0.50 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.67 | -0.35 | -0.32 |
Drawdowns
BIS vs. BITU - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BIS drawdown since its inception was -99.87%, which is greater than BITU's maximum drawdown of -78.94%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BIS and BITU.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BIS | BITU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -99.87% | -78.94% | -20.93% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -54.50% | -78.94% | +24.44% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -66.87% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -74.80% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -95.25% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -99.85% | -78.94% | -20.91% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -90.03% | -34.49% | -55.54% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 39.59% | 49.84% | -10.25% |
Volatility
BIS vs. BITU - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for ProShares UltraShort Nasdaq Biotechnology (BIS) is 13.87%, while Proshares Ultra Bitcoin ETF (BITU) has a volatility of 18.99%. This indicates that BIS experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BITU based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BIS | BITU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 13.87% | 18.99% | -5.12% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 30.95% | 69.41% | -38.46% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 39.68% | 87.00% | -47.32% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 43.74% | 97.45% | -53.71% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 46.36% | 97.45% | -51.09% |
BIS vs. BITU - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both BIS and BITU have an expense ratio of 0.95%.
Dividends
BIS vs. BITU - Dividend Comparison
BIS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.92%, less than BITU's 83.36% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BIS ProShares UltraShort Nasdaq Biotechnology | 4.92% | 5.25% | 3.73% | 1.75% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.45% | 2.11% | 0.37% |
BITU Proshares Ultra Bitcoin ETF | 83.36% | 50.23% | 0.12% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
BIS and BITU have a correlation of -0.33, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
BITU has higher volatility (18.99%) compared to BIS (13.87%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BIS dropped -99.87% vs BITU's -78.94%.
On 1-year performance, BIS leads with -49.58% vs -73.07% for BITU. Both ETFs have the same 0.95% expense ratio. On volatility, BIS has been the lower-risk option at 13.87%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, BIS has performed better with a -49.58% return vs -73.07%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
BIS and BITU have the same expense ratio: 0.95% per year.
BITU has the higher dividend yield at 83.36%, compared with 4.92% for BIS.
BIS is categorized as Leveraged Equities, while BITU is Cryptocurrency. BIS tracks NASDAQ Biotechnology Index (-200%), while BITU tracks Bloomberg Bitcoin Index - Benchmark TR Gross.
BITU currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.84 vs -1.25), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for BIS and BITU
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer