BIP-UN.TO vs. RIO
BIP-UN.TO (Brookfield Infrastructure Partners L.P) and RIO (Rio Tinto Group) are both stocks. BIP-UN.TO operates in Utilities - Diversified (Utilities), while RIO operates in Other Industrial Metals & Mining (Basic Materials). Over the past 10 years, BIP-UN.TO returned 30.11%/yr vs 23.61%/yr for RIO. At a 0.14 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
BIP-UN.TO vs. RIO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
BIP-UN.TO is traded in CAD, while RIO is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the RIO values have been converted to CAD using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BIP-UN.TO achieves a 14.93% return, which is significantly lower than RIO's 38.21% return. Over the past 10 years, BIP-UN.TO has outperformed RIO with an annualized return of 30.11%, while RIO has yielded a comparatively lower 23.61% annualized return.
BIP-UN.TO
- 1D
- -0.07%
- 1M
- 3.28%
- YTD
- 14.93%
- 6M
- 14.64%
- 1Y
- 22.29%
- 3Y*
- 8.28%
- 5Y*
- 18.36%
- 10Y*
- 30.11%
RIO
- 1D
- 1.94%
- 1M
- -3.98%
- YTD
- 38.21%
- 6M
- 45.33%
- 1Y
- 93.47%
- 3Y*
- 26.45%
- 5Y*
- 15.04%
- 10Y*
- 23.61%
BIP-UN.TO vs. RIO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BIP-UN.TO Brookfield Infrastructure Partners L.P | 14.93% | 10.04% | 15.27% | 4.54% | 27.87% | 27.84% | 14.53% | 46.25% | -11.04% | 33.26% |
RIO Rio Tinto Group | 38.21% | 37.87% | -8.19% | 8.42% | 25.98% | -3.72% | 32.99% | 27.69% | 5.24% | 35.07% |
Correlation
The correlation between BIP-UN.TO and RIO is 0.22, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.22 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.28 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.22 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.18 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 10, 2009 | 0.14 |
The correlation between BIP-UN.TO and RIO shifts across timeframes, from 0.14 (all time) to 0.28 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
BIP-UN.TO:
CA$24.64B
RIO:
$172.61B
BIP-UN.TO:
$0.91
RIO:
$13.11
BIP-UN.TO:
42.33
RIO:
8.03
BIP-UN.TO:
0.74
RIO:
1.55
BIP-UN.TO:
3.82
RIO:
2.77
BIP-UN.TO:
$24.01B
RIO:
$111.41B
BIP-UN.TO:
$6.49B
RIO:
$31.10B
BIP-UN.TO:
$11.14B
RIO:
$40.42B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BIP-UN.TO vs. RIO — Risk / Return Rank
BIP-UN.TO
RIO
BIP-UN.TO vs. RIO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Brookfield Infrastructure Partners L.P (BIP-UN.TO) and Rio Tinto Group (RIO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| BIP-UN.TO | RIO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.97 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.96 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.22 | 1.47 | -0.26 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.88 | 6.28 | -4.40 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.20 | 24.69 | -20.49 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
BIP-UN.TO vs. RIO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BIP-UN.TO drawdown since its inception was -46.85%, smaller than the maximum RIO drawdown of -85.94%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BIP-UN.TO and RIO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BIP-UN.TO | RIO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -46.85% | -85.94% | +39.09% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.91% | -14.97% | +3.06% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -38.88% | -20.72% | -18.16% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -44.39% | -31.61% | -12.78% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -46.85% | -31.61% | -15.24% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.43% | -4.65% | +3.22% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.46% | -25.26% | +18.80% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 5.33% | 3.82% | +1.51% |
Volatility
BIP-UN.TO vs. RIO - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Brookfield Infrastructure Partners L.P (BIP-UN.TO) is 4.57%, while Rio Tinto Group (RIO) has a volatility of 11.89%. This indicates that BIP-UN.TO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than RIO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BIP-UN.TO | RIO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.57% | 11.89% | -7.32% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 14.01% | 24.34% | -10.33% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 18.22% | 29.42% | -11.20% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 32.95% | 29.82% | +3.13% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 38.57% | 31.32% | +7.25% |
Dividends
BIP-UN.TO vs. RIO - Dividend Comparison
BIP-UN.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.55%, more than RIO's 3.82% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BIP-UN.TO Brookfield Infrastructure Partners L.P | 4.55% | 5.04% | 4.85% | 5.00% | 4.23% | 3.97% | 5.61% | 5.62% | 6.65% | 5.64% | 5.16% | 10.13% |
RIO Rio Tinto Group | 3.82% | 4.66% | 7.40% | 5.40% | 10.48% | 10.23% | 5.13% | 7.68% | 6.32% | 4.47% | 3.93% | 7.58% |
Financials
BIP-UN.TO vs. RIO - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Brookfield Infrastructure Partners L.P and Rio Tinto Group. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
BIP-UN.TO vs. RIO - Profitability Comparison
BIP-UN.TO - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Brookfield Infrastructure Partners L.P reported a gross profit of 1.70B and revenue of 6.30B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 26.9%.
RIO - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Rio Tinto Group reported a gross profit of 8.15B and revenue of 30.65B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 26.6%.
BIP-UN.TO - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Brookfield Infrastructure Partners L.P reported an operating income of 1.59B and revenue of 6.30B, resulting in an operating margin of 25.2%.
RIO - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Rio Tinto Group reported an operating income of 8.15B and revenue of 30.65B, resulting in an operating margin of 26.6%.
BIP-UN.TO - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Brookfield Infrastructure Partners L.P reported a net income of -86.00M and revenue of 6.30B, resulting in a net margin of -1.4%.
RIO - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Rio Tinto Group reported a net income of 5.42B and revenue of 30.65B, resulting in a net margin of 17.7%.
Frequently Asked Questions
BIP-UN.TO and RIO have a correlation of 0.22, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
Find the right allocation for BIP-UN.TO and RIO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer