BIP-PF.TO vs. XLY
BIP-PF.TO (Brookfield Infrastructure Partners L.P.) is a stock, while XLY (Consumer Discretionary Select Sector SPDR Fund) is Consumer Discretionary Equities fund tracking the Consumer Discretionary Select Sector Index. Over the past 5 years, BIP-PF.TO returned 6.55%/yr vs 10.07%/yr for XLY. At a 0.09 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
BIP-PF.TO vs. XLY - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
BIP-PF.TO is traded in CAD, while XLY is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the XLY values have been converted to CAD using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BIP-PF.TO achieves a 4.03% return, which is significantly higher than XLY's -2.10% return.
BIP-PF.TO
- 1D
- -0.04%
- 1M
- 2.07%
- YTD
- 4.03%
- 6M
- 5.93%
- 1Y
- 11.15%
- 3Y*
- 18.14%
- 5Y*
- 6.55%
- 10Y*
- —
XLY
- 1D
- -1.84%
- 1M
- -2.04%
- YTD
- -2.10%
- 6M
- -2.83%
- 1Y
- 12.68%
- 3Y*
- 15.44%
- 5Y*
- 10.07%
- 10Y*
- 13.41%
BIP-PF.TO vs. XLY - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BIP-PF.TO Brookfield Infrastructure Partners L.P. | 4.03% | 16.92% | 28.47% | 8.97% | -21.39% | 13.03% | 14.82% | 5.18% | -8.59% |
XLY Consumer Discretionary Select Sector SPDR Fund | -2.10% | 2.45% | 37.38% | 36.56% | -31.73% | 26.77% | 27.44% | 22.08% | -10.66% |
Correlation
The correlation between BIP-PF.TO and XLY is 0.11, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.11 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.09 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.11 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 13, 2018 | 0.09 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BIP-PF.TO vs. XLY — Risk / Return Rank
BIP-PF.TO
XLY
BIP-PF.TO vs. XLY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Brookfield Infrastructure Partners L.P. (BIP-PF.TO) and Consumer Discretionary Select Sector SPDR Fund (XLY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| BIP-PF.TO | XLY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.80 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.17 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.28 | 1.13 | +0.15 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.60 | 0.85 | +2.75 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 10.91 | 2.36 | +8.55 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| BIP-PF.TO | XLY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.52 | 0.72 | +0.80 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.44 | 0.46 | -0.02 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.66 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.38 | 0.95 | -0.57 |
Drawdowns
BIP-PF.TO vs. XLY - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BIP-PF.TO drawdown since its inception was -36.04%, roughly equal to the maximum XLY drawdown of -35.37%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BIP-PF.TO and XLY.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BIP-PF.TO | XLY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -36.04% | -35.37% | -0.67% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -3.13% | -15.01% | +11.88% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -16.03% | -26.77% | +10.74% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -24.81% | -35.37% | +10.56% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -35.37% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.07% | -7.31% | +6.24% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.19% | -5.81% | -1.38% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.03% | 5.39% | -4.36% |
Volatility
BIP-PF.TO vs. XLY - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Brookfield Infrastructure Partners L.P. (BIP-PF.TO) is 2.25%, while Consumer Discretionary Select Sector SPDR Fund (XLY) has a volatility of 5.11%. This indicates that BIP-PF.TO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than XLY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BIP-PF.TO | XLY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.25% | 5.11% | -2.86% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 5.10% | 12.93% | -7.83% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 7.44% | 17.86% | -10.42% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.00% | 22.09% | -7.09% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.08% | 20.43% | -2.35% |
Dividends
BIP-PF.TO vs. XLY - Dividend Comparison
BIP-PF.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.23%, more than XLY's 0.78% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BIP-PF.TO Brookfield Infrastructure Partners L.P. | 6.23% | 6.28% | 6.88% | 6.50% | 6.64% | 4.95% | 5.31% | 5.76% | 1.72% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
XLY Consumer Discretionary Select Sector SPDR Fund | 0.78% | 0.79% | 0.72% | 0.78% | 1.00% | 0.53% | 0.82% | 1.28% | 1.34% | 1.20% | 1.71% | 1.43% |
Frequently Asked Questions
BIP-PF.TO and XLY have a correlation of 0.11, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
Find the right allocation for BIP-PF.TO and XLY
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer