BINT vs. RMRC

Last updated Jul 15, 2026

BINT (Bluemonte Global Equity ETF) and RMRC (ARMOR Core Risk-Managed ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - BINT is a Global Equities fund managed by Bluemonte, while RMRC is a Actively Managed fund actively managed by Exchange Traded Concepts. A 0.60 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. BINT charges 0.23%/yr vs 0.60%/yr for RMRC.

Performance

BINT vs. RMRC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Bluemonte Global Equity ETF (BINT) and ARMOR Core Risk-Managed ETF (RMRC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

BINT

• 1D: 1.04%
• 1M: -0.44%
• 6M: 10.58%
• YTD: 14.01%
• 1Y: 26.18%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

RMRC

• 1D: -0.23%
• 1M: 0.74%
• 6M: —
• YTD: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BINT vs. RMRC - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)
BINT Bluemonte Global Equity ETF	5.85%
RMRC ARMOR Core Risk-Managed ETF	2.58%

Correlation

The correlation between BINT and RMRC is 0.60, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 24, 2026	0.60

Return for Risk

BINT vs. RMRC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BINT

BINT Risk / Return Rank: 62
BINT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 62
BINT Sortino Ratio Rank: 59
BINT Omega Ratio Rank: 63
BINT Calmar Ratio Rank: 60
BINT Martin Ratio Rank: 67

RMRC

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BINT vs. RMRC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Bluemonte Global Equity ETF (BINT) and ARMOR Core Risk-Managed ETF (RMRC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	BINT	RMRC	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.64	—	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.26	—	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.30	—	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.40	—	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	9.62	—	—

Drawdowns

BINT vs. RMRC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BINT drawdown since its inception was -10.94%, which is greater than RMRC's maximum drawdown of -6.57%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BINT and RMRC.

Drawdown Indicators

	BINT	RMRC	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-10.94%	-6.57%	-4.37%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-10.94%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-2.42%	-0.55%	-1.87%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-1.55%	-1.66%	+0.11%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.73%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	BINT	RMRC	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.45%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	14.09%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	16.00%	10.26%	+5.74%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	15.73%	10.26%	+5.47%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	15.73%	10.26%	+5.47%

BINT vs. RMRC - Expense Ratio Comparison

BINT has a 0.23% expense ratio, which is lower than RMRC's 0.60% expense ratio.

Dividends

BINT vs. RMRC - Dividend Comparison

BINT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.75%, more than RMRC's 0.58% yield.

Position	TTM	2025
BINT Bluemonte Global Equity ETF	1.75%	1.08%
RMRC ARMOR Core Risk-Managed ETF	0.58%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both BINT and RMRC in my portfolio?

BINT and RMRC have a correlation of 0.60, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, BINT or RMRC?

On fees, BINT is cheaper at 0.23% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, BINT or RMRC?

BINT is cheaper with a 0.23% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for RMRC.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, BINT or RMRC?

BINT has the higher dividend yield at 1.75%, compared with 0.58% for RMRC.

What is the main difference between BINT and RMRC?

BINT is categorized as Global Equities, while RMRC is Actively Managed. They also come from different issuers: Bluemonte and Exchange Traded Concepts. Their fees differ too: 0.23% for BINT and 0.60% for RMRC.