BINT vs. DRIV

Last updated Aug 4, 2026

BINT (Bluemonte Global Equity ETF) and DRIV (Global X Autonomous & Electric Vehicles ETF) are both Global Equities funds. BINT is actively managed, while DRIV is passively managed. Over the past year, BINT returned 28.06% vs 44.16% for DRIV. Their correlation of 0.83 means they have usually moved in the same direction. BINT charges 0.23%/yr vs 0.68%/yr for DRIV.

Performance

BINT vs. DRIV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Bluemonte Global Equity ETF (BINT) and Global X Autonomous & Electric Vehicles ETF (DRIV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BINT achieves a 14.01% return, which is significantly lower than DRIV's 14.79% return.

BINT

• 1D: 0.72%
• 1M: 0.16%
• 6M: 8.18%
• YTD: 14.01%
• 1Y: 28.06%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 27.03%

DRIV

• 1D: 1.45%
• 1M: -7.76%
• 6M: 5.72%
• YTD: 14.79%
• 1Y: 44.16%
• 3Y*: 10.30%
• 5Y*: 4.79%
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 11.65%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
BINT Bluemonte Global Equity ETF	$862.27K	$966.71K	$1.78M
DRIV Global X Autonomous & Electric Vehicles ETF	$2.01M	$2.09M	$2.91M

BINT vs. DRIV - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
BINT Bluemonte Global Equity ETF	14.01%	14.43%
DRIV Global X Autonomous & Electric Vehicles ETF	14.79%	34.58%

Correlation

The correlation between BINT and DRIV is 0.84, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.84
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 23, 2025	0.83

The correlation between BINT and DRIV has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.83 to 0.84 - a consistent structural relationship.

BINT vs. DRIV - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	BINT	DRIV
Technology	28.7%	40.9%
Financial Services	18.5%	-
Industrials	13.0%	17.5%
Consumer Cyclical	8.2%	23.8%
Healthcare	7.3%	-
Communication Services	5.9%	6.3%
Basic Materials	5.2%	11.5%
Consumer Defensive	4.7%	-
Energy	3.9%	-
Utilities	2.6%	-
Real Estate	2.1%	-

Return for Risk

BINT vs. DRIV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

BINT

BINT Risk / Return Rank: 69
BINT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 68
BINT Sortino Ratio Rank: 66
BINT Omega Ratio Rank: 69
BINT Calmar Ratio Rank: 67
BINT Martin Ratio Rank: 73

DRIV

DRIV Risk / Return Rank: 56
DRIV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 63
DRIV Sortino Ratio Rank: 57
DRIV Omega Ratio Rank: 57
DRIV Calmar Ratio Rank: 49
DRIV Martin Ratio Rank: 52

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

BINT vs. DRIV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Bluemonte Global Equity ETF (BINT) and Global X Autonomous & Electric Vehicles ETF (DRIV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	BINT	DRIV	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.73	1.51	+0.22
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.39	2.01	+0.37
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.32	1.26	+0.06
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.58	1.80	+0.78
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	9.95	6.31	+3.64

BINT vs. DRIV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BINT Sharpe Ratio is 1.73, which is comparable to the DRIV Sharpe Ratio of 1.51. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BINT and DRIV, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

BINT vs. DRIV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BINT drawdown since its inception was -10.94%, smaller than the maximum DRIV drawdown of -41.93%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BINT and DRIV.

Drawdown Indicators

	BINT	DRIV	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-10.94%	-41.93%	+30.99%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-10.94%	-24.70%	+13.76%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-30.71%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-41.93%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-2.42%	-20.16%	+17.74%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-1.65%	-15.09%	+13.44%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.83%	7.01%	-4.18%

Volatility

BINT vs. DRIV - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Bluemonte Global Equity ETF (BINT) is 5.24%, while Global X Autonomous & Electric Vehicles ETF (DRIV) has a volatility of 10.58%. This indicates that BINT experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than DRIV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	BINT	DRIV	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.24%	10.58%	-5.34%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	14.39%	24.51%	-10.12%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	16.32%	29.44%	-13.12%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	15.83%	27.94%	-12.11%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	15.83%	27.75%	-11.92%

BINT vs. DRIV - Expense Ratio Comparison

BINT has a 0.23% expense ratio, which is lower than DRIV's 0.68% expense ratio.

Dividends

BINT vs. DRIV - Dividend Comparison

BINT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.75%, more than DRIV's 0.65% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018
BINT Bluemonte Global Equity ETF	1.75%	1.08%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
DRIV Global X Autonomous & Electric Vehicles ETF	0.65%	1.07%	2.07%	1.62%	1.24%	0.32%	0.29%	1.23%	2.79%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both BINT and DRIV in my portfolio?

BINT and DRIV have a correlation of 0.84, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, BINT or DRIV?

DRIV has higher volatility (10.58%) compared to BINT (5.24%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BINT dropped -10.94% vs DRIV's -41.93%.

Which ETF is better, BINT or DRIV?

On 1-year performance, DRIV leads with 44.16% vs 28.06% for BINT. On fees, BINT is cheaper at 0.23% per year. On volatility, BINT has been the lower-risk option at 5.24%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, BINT or DRIV?

Over the 1-year period, DRIV has performed better with a 44.16% return vs 28.06%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, BINT or DRIV?

BINT is cheaper with a 0.23% expense ratio, compared with 0.68% for DRIV.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, BINT or DRIV?

BINT has the higher dividend yield at 1.75%, compared with 0.65% for DRIV.

What is the main difference between BINT and DRIV?

They also come from different issuers: Bluemonte and Global X. Their fees differ too: 0.23% for BINT and 0.68% for DRIV.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

BINT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.73 vs 1.51), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.