PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BEMIX vs. PEMYX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

BEMIX vs. PEMYX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Brandes Emerging Markets Fund (BEMIX) and Putnam Emerging Markets Equity Fund (PEMYX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BEMIX achieves a 21.14% return, which is significantly higher than PEMYX's 17.49% return. Over the past 10 years, BEMIX has underperformed PEMYX with an annualized return of 8.91%, while PEMYX has yielded a comparatively higher 10.55% annualized return.


BEMIX

1D
2.96%
1M
2.53%
6M
11.44%
YTD
21.14%
1Y
45.06%
3Y*
23.07%
5Y*
13.55%
10Y*
8.91%
ALL TIME*
5.09%

PEMYX

1D
3.84%
1M
-4.07%
6M
7.99%
YTD
17.49%
1Y
35.35%
3Y*
22.08%
5Y*
7.50%
10Y*
10.55%
ALL TIME*
7.04%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$0.00$0.00$0.00

BEMIX vs. PEMYX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
BEMIX
Brandes Emerging Markets Fund
21.14%47.83%4.01%22.53%-15.91%1.68%-6.17%18.60%-15.56%26.00%
PEMYX
Putnam Emerging Markets Equity Fund
17.49%33.48%16.22%12.16%-27.42%-3.85%37.11%22.70%-17.39%42.73%

Correlation

The correlation between BEMIX and PEMYX is 0.92, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.92

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.87

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.87

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.82

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 31, 2011

0.83

The correlation between BEMIX and PEMYX shifts across timeframes, from 0.82 (10 years) to 0.92 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BEMIX vs. PEMYX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

BEMIX
BEMIX Risk / Return Rank: 8989
Overall Rank
BEMIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9191
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BEMIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8484
Sortino Ratio Rank
BEMIX Omega Ratio Rank: 8686
Omega Ratio Rank
BEMIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9292
Calmar Ratio Rank
BEMIX Martin Ratio Rank: 9191
Martin Ratio Rank

PEMYX
PEMYX Risk / Return Rank: 6060
Overall Rank
PEMYX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5858
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PEMYX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4949
Sortino Ratio Rank
PEMYX Omega Ratio Rank: 6262
Omega Ratio Rank
PEMYX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7171
Calmar Ratio Rank
PEMYX Martin Ratio Rank: 6060
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

BEMIX vs. PEMYX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Brandes Emerging Markets Fund (BEMIX) and Putnam Emerging Markets Equity Fund (PEMYX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


BEMIXPEMYXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.85

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.07

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.43

1.28

+0.16

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.60

2.32

+1.28

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

12.87

7.71

+5.16

BEMIX vs. PEMYX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BEMIX Sharpe Ratio is 2.29, which is higher than the PEMYX Sharpe Ratio of 1.44. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BEMIX and PEMYX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

BEMIX vs. PEMYX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BEMIX drawdown since its inception was -46.05%, roughly equal to the maximum PEMYX drawdown of -45.25%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BEMIX and PEMYX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BEMIXPEMYXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-46.05%

-45.25%

-0.80%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.07%

-14.46%

+2.39%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-16.08%

-14.46%

-1.62%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-32.88%

-40.49%

+7.61%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-46.05%

-45.16%

-0.89%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.70%

-11.18%

+7.48%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-14.07%

-16.29%

+2.22%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.37%

4.34%

-0.97%

Volatility

BEMIX vs. PEMYX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Brandes Emerging Markets Fund (BEMIX) is 6.36%, while Putnam Emerging Markets Equity Fund (PEMYX) has a volatility of 10.09%. This indicates that BEMIX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PEMYX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BEMIXPEMYXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.36%

10.09%

-3.73%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

16.81%

21.44%

-4.63%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

18.95%

23.28%

-4.33%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.99%

18.27%

-1.28%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.17%

18.41%

-1.24%

BEMIX vs. PEMYX - Expense Ratio Comparison

BEMIX has a 1.12% expense ratio, which is higher than PEMYX's 1.08% expense ratio.


Dividends

BEMIX vs. PEMYX - Dividend Comparison

BEMIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.90%, more than PEMYX's 0.66% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BEMIX
Brandes Emerging Markets Fund
1.90%2.15%3.04%2.45%2.86%2.31%1.31%2.56%1.55%1.41%2.20%1.54%
PEMYX
Putnam Emerging Markets Equity Fund
0.66%0.78%1.85%0.99%0.00%5.27%1.78%1.40%2.16%0.24%1.18%1.50%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.92, BEMIX and PEMYX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

PEMYX has higher volatility (10.09%) compared to BEMIX (6.36%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BEMIX dropped -46.05% vs PEMYX's -45.25%.

BEMIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.29 vs 1.44), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BEMIX and PEMYX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer