BEMIX vs. PEMYX
Compare and contrast key facts about Brandes Emerging Markets Fund (BEMIX) and Putnam Emerging Markets Equity Fund (PEMYX).
BEMIX is managed by Brandes. It was launched on Jan 30, 2011. PEMYX is managed by Putnam. It was launched on Sep 28, 2008.
Performance
BEMIX vs. PEMYX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
BEMIX vs. PEMYX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BEMIX Brandes Emerging Markets Fund | 2.96% | 47.83% | 4.01% | 22.53% | -15.91% | 1.68% | -6.17% | 18.60% | -15.56% | 26.00% |
PEMYX Putnam Emerging Markets Equity Fund | 1.54% | 33.48% | 16.22% | 12.16% | -27.42% | -3.85% | 37.11% | 22.70% | -17.39% | 42.73% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BEMIX achieves a 2.96% return, which is significantly higher than PEMYX's 1.54% return. Over the past 10 years, BEMIX has underperformed PEMYX with an annualized return of 8.04%, while PEMYX has yielded a comparatively higher 9.92% annualized return.
BEMIX
- 1D
- -0.79%
- 1M
- -11.64%
- YTD
- 2.96%
- 6M
- 11.40%
- 1Y
- 45.15%
- 3Y*
- 21.23%
- 5Y*
- 9.84%
- 10Y*
- 8.04%
PEMYX
- 1D
- -0.93%
- 1M
- -12.11%
- YTD
- 1.54%
- 6M
- 5.88%
- 1Y
- 30.84%
- 3Y*
- 18.48%
- 5Y*
- 4.30%
- 10Y*
- 9.92%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
BEMIX vs. PEMYX - Expense Ratio Comparison
BEMIX has a 1.12% expense ratio, which is higher than PEMYX's 1.08% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
BEMIX vs. PEMYX — Risk / Return Rank
BEMIX
PEMYX
BEMIX vs. PEMYX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Brandes Emerging Markets Fund (BEMIX) and Putnam Emerging Markets Equity Fund (PEMYX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| BEMIX | PEMYX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 2.57 | 1.78 | +0.79 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 3.24 | 2.34 | +0.90 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.51 | 1.34 | +0.17 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.45 | 2.15 | +1.29 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 14.31 | 8.98 | +5.34 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| BEMIX | PEMYX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.57 | 1.78 | +0.79 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.61 | 0.26 | +0.35 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.48 | 0.56 | -0.09 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.24 | 0.30 | -0.06 |
Correlation
The correlation between BEMIX and PEMYX is 0.83, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
BEMIX vs. PEMYX - Dividend Comparison
BEMIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.09%, more than PEMYX's 0.77% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BEMIX Brandes Emerging Markets Fund | 2.09% | 2.15% | 3.04% | 2.45% | 2.86% | 2.31% | 1.31% | 2.56% | 1.55% | 1.41% | 2.20% | 1.54% |
PEMYX Putnam Emerging Markets Equity Fund | 0.77% | 0.78% | 1.85% | 0.99% | 0.00% | 5.27% | 1.78% | 1.40% | 2.16% | 0.24% | 1.18% | 1.50% |
Drawdowns
BEMIX vs. PEMYX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BEMIX drawdown since its inception was -46.05%, roughly equal to the maximum PEMYX drawdown of -45.25%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BEMIX and PEMYX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| BEMIX | PEMYX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -46.05% | -45.25% | -0.80% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.07% | -13.26% | +1.19% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -36.37% | -41.05% | +4.68% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -46.05% | -45.16% | -0.89% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -12.07% | -13.26% | +1.19% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -14.32% | -16.52% | +2.20% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.91% | 3.18% | -0.27% |
Volatility
BEMIX vs. PEMYX - Volatility Comparison
Brandes Emerging Markets Fund (BEMIX) and Putnam Emerging Markets Equity Fund (PEMYX) have volatilities of 8.42% and 8.30%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| BEMIX | PEMYX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.42% | 8.30% | +0.12% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.56% | 13.03% | -0.47% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 17.37% | 17.23% | +0.14% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.15% | 16.73% | -0.58% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.96% | 17.62% | -0.66% |