BIMSX vs. BSBIX
Compare and contrast key facts about Baird Intermediate Bond Fund (BIMSX) and Baird Short-Term Bond Fund Institutional Class (BSBIX).
BIMSX is managed by Baird. It was launched on Sep 29, 2000. BSBIX is a passively managed fund by Baird that tracks the performance of the Bloomberg Barclays 1-3 Year U.S. Government/Credit Bond Index. It was launched on Aug 31, 2004.
Performance
BIMSX vs. BSBIX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
BIMSX vs. BSBIX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BIMSX Baird Intermediate Bond Fund | -0.14% | 6.76% | 3.21% | 5.53% | -8.88% | -1.68% | 7.16% | 6.83% | 0.30% | 2.53% |
BSBIX Baird Short-Term Bond Fund Institutional Class | 0.27% | 5.67% | 4.99% | 5.65% | -3.64% | -0.42% | 4.23% | 4.68% | 1.49% | 1.53% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BIMSX achieves a -0.14% return, which is significantly lower than BSBIX's 0.27% return. Over the past 10 years, BIMSX has underperformed BSBIX with an annualized return of 2.04%, while BSBIX has yielded a comparatively higher 2.51% annualized return.
BIMSX
- 1D
- 0.18%
- 1M
- -0.95%
- YTD
- -0.14%
- 6M
- 0.79%
- 1Y
- 4.07%
- 3Y*
- 4.31%
- 5Y*
- 1.16%
- 10Y*
- 2.04%
BSBIX
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- -0.39%
- YTD
- 0.27%
- 6M
- 1.29%
- 1Y
- 4.15%
- 3Y*
- 5.01%
- 5Y*
- 2.46%
- 10Y*
- 2.51%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
BIMSX vs. BSBIX - Expense Ratio Comparison
BIMSX has a 0.55% expense ratio, which is higher than BSBIX's 0.30% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
BIMSX vs. BSBIX — Risk / Return Rank
BIMSX
BSBIX
BIMSX vs. BSBIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Baird Intermediate Bond Fund (BIMSX) and Baird Short-Term Bond Fund Institutional Class (BSBIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| BIMSX | BSBIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.50 | 3.02 | -1.52 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.23 | 4.76 | -2.53 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.29 | 1.81 | -0.52 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.33 | 4.54 | -2.21 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.69 | 20.13 | -11.43 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| BIMSX | BSBIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.50 | 3.02 | -1.52 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.30 | 1.28 | -0.98 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.63 | 1.51 | -0.88 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.09 | 1.64 | -0.55 |
Correlation
The correlation between BIMSX and BSBIX is 0.75, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
BIMSX vs. BSBIX - Dividend Comparison
BIMSX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.56%, less than BSBIX's 4.30% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BIMSX Baird Intermediate Bond Fund | 3.56% | 3.50% | 3.44% | 2.81% | 1.81% | 1.90% | 3.08% | 2.16% | 2.14% | 1.98% | 1.89% | 2.21% |
BSBIX Baird Short-Term Bond Fund Institutional Class | 4.30% | 4.35% | 4.34% | 3.41% | 1.79% | 1.42% | 2.61% | 2.49% | 2.20% | 1.73% | 1.60% | 1.62% |
Drawdowns
BIMSX vs. BSBIX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BIMSX drawdown since its inception was -13.07%, which is greater than BSBIX's maximum drawdown of -5.95%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BIMSX and BSBIX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| BIMSX | BSBIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -13.07% | -5.95% | -7.12% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -1.87% | -0.94% | -0.93% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -13.00% | -5.95% | -7.05% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -13.07% | -5.95% | -7.12% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.30% | -0.59% | -0.71% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.59% | -0.55% | -1.04% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.50% | 0.21% | +0.29% |
Volatility
BIMSX vs. BSBIX - Volatility Comparison
Baird Intermediate Bond Fund (BIMSX) has a higher volatility of 1.03% compared to Baird Short-Term Bond Fund Institutional Class (BSBIX) at 0.53%. This indicates that BIMSX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BSBIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| BIMSX | BSBIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.03% | 0.53% | +0.50% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 1.67% | 0.86% | +0.81% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.80% | 1.42% | +1.38% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 3.86% | 1.93% | +1.93% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 3.24% | 1.67% | +1.57% |