PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BIMSX vs. BSBIX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

BIMSX vs. BSBIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Baird Intermediate Bond Fund (BIMSX) and Baird Short-Term Bond Fund Institutional Class (BSBIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BIMSX achieves a -0.01% return, which is significantly lower than BSBIX's 0.73% return. Over the past 10 years, BIMSX has underperformed BSBIX with an annualized return of 1.95%, while BSBIX has yielded a comparatively higher 2.48% annualized return.


BIMSX

1D
-0.18%
1M
-0.05%
YTD
-0.01%
6M
0.26%
1Y
3.53%
3Y*
4.46%
5Y*
1.03%
10Y*
1.95%

BSBIX

1D
-0.11%
1M
0.15%
YTD
0.73%
6M
1.06%
1Y
3.89%
3Y*
5.10%
5Y*
2.49%
10Y*
2.48%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BIMSX vs. BSBIX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
BIMSX
Baird Intermediate Bond Fund
-0.01%6.76%3.21%5.53%-8.88%-1.68%7.16%6.83%0.30%2.53%
BSBIX
Baird Short-Term Bond Fund Institutional Class
0.73%5.67%4.99%5.65%-3.64%-0.42%4.23%4.68%1.49%1.53%

Correlation

The correlation between BIMSX and BSBIX is 0.75, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.75

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.80

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.82

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.77

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 1, 2004

0.75

The correlation between BIMSX and BSBIX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.75 to 0.82 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BIMSX vs. BSBIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BIMSX
BIMSX Risk / Return Rank: 3030
Overall Rank
BIMSX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2929
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BIMSX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3232
Sortino Ratio Rank
BIMSX Omega Ratio Rank: 3131
Omega Ratio Rank
BIMSX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3232
Calmar Ratio Rank
BIMSX Martin Ratio Rank: 2727
Martin Ratio Rank

BSBIX
BSBIX Risk / Return Rank: 9292
Overall Rank
BSBIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9191
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BSBIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9494
Sortino Ratio Rank
BSBIX Omega Ratio Rank: 9696
Omega Ratio Rank
BSBIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8888
Calmar Ratio Rank
BSBIX Martin Ratio Rank: 9191
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BIMSX vs. BSBIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Baird Intermediate Bond Fund (BIMSX) and Baird Short-Term Bond Fund Institutional Class (BSBIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


BIMSXBSBIXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.53

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.57

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.29

1.82

-0.54

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.10

4.28

-2.18

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.48

18.62

-12.14

BIMSX vs. BSBIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BIMSX Sharpe Ratio is 1.55, which is lower than the BSBIX Sharpe Ratio of 3.07. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BIMSX and BSBIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


BIMSXBSBIXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.55

3.07

-1.53

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.27

1.29

-1.02

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.60

1.49

-0.89

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.09

1.64

-0.55

Drawdowns

BIMSX vs. BSBIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BIMSX drawdown since its inception was -13.07%, which is greater than BSBIX's maximum drawdown of -5.95%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BIMSX and BSBIX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BIMSXBSBIXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-13.07%

-5.95%

-7.12%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-1.87%

-0.94%

-0.93%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-2.57%

-0.94%

-1.63%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-13.00%

-5.95%

-7.05%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-13.07%

-5.95%

-7.12%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.16%

-0.13%

-1.03%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.59%

-0.55%

-1.04%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.60%

0.22%

+0.38%

Volatility

BIMSX vs. BSBIX - Volatility Comparison

Baird Intermediate Bond Fund (BIMSX) has a higher volatility of 0.85% compared to Baird Short-Term Bond Fund Institutional Class (BSBIX) at 0.42%. This indicates that BIMSX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BSBIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BIMSXBSBIXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.85%

0.42%

+0.43%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

1.79%

0.98%

+0.81%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.54%

1.31%

+1.23%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

3.88%

1.94%

+1.94%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

3.24%

1.67%

+1.57%

BIMSX vs. BSBIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

BIMSX has a 0.55% expense ratio, which is higher than BSBIX's 0.30% expense ratio.


Dividends

BIMSX vs. BSBIX - Dividend Comparison

BIMSX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.60%, less than BSBIX's 4.27% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BIMSX
Baird Intermediate Bond Fund
3.60%3.50%3.44%2.81%1.81%1.90%3.08%2.16%2.14%1.98%1.89%2.21%
BSBIX
Baird Short-Term Bond Fund Institutional Class
4.27%4.35%4.34%3.41%1.79%1.42%2.61%2.49%2.20%1.73%1.60%1.62%

Frequently Asked Questions


BIMSX and BSBIX have a correlation of 0.75, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

BIMSX has higher volatility (0.85%) compared to BSBIX (0.42%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BIMSX dropped -13.07% vs BSBIX's -5.95%.

BSBIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.07 vs 1.55), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BIMSX and BSBIX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer