BIMPX vs. SIFAX
Compare and contrast key facts about BlackRock 40/60 Target Allocation Fund (BIMPX) and SEI Institutional Managed Trust Multi-Asset Inflation Managed Fund (SIFAX).
BIMPX is managed by BlackRock. It was launched on Dec 20, 2006. SIFAX is managed by BlackRock. It was launched on Apr 8, 2012.
Performance
BIMPX vs. SIFAX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
BIMPX vs. SIFAX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BIMPX BlackRock 40/60 Target Allocation Fund | -1.31% | 13.43% | 4.93% | 12.41% | -14.84% | 3.51% | 19.76% | 16.65% | -3.77% | 11.77% |
SIFAX SEI Institutional Managed Trust Multi-Asset Inflation Managed Fund | 8.96% | 7.82% | 4.08% | -1.74% | 8.48% | 10.83% | -1.59% | 5.68% | -3.64% | -1.96% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BIMPX achieves a -1.31% return, which is significantly lower than SIFAX's 8.96% return. Over the past 10 years, BIMPX has outperformed SIFAX with an annualized return of 6.13%, while SIFAX has yielded a comparatively lower 3.91% annualized return.
BIMPX
- 1D
- 1.58%
- 1M
- -3.70%
- YTD
- -1.31%
- 6M
- 0.16%
- 1Y
- 11.33%
- 3Y*
- 8.33%
- 5Y*
- 3.58%
- 10Y*
- 6.13%
SIFAX
- 1D
- -0.35%
- 1M
- 1.77%
- YTD
- 8.96%
- 6M
- 10.57%
- 1Y
- 10.85%
- 3Y*
- 7.16%
- 5Y*
- 6.83%
- 10Y*
- 3.91%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
BIMPX vs. SIFAX - Expense Ratio Comparison
BIMPX has a 0.11% expense ratio, which is lower than SIFAX's 0.90% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
BIMPX vs. SIFAX — Risk / Return Rank
BIMPX
SIFAX
BIMPX vs. SIFAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BlackRock 40/60 Target Allocation Fund (BIMPX) and SEI Institutional Managed Trust Multi-Asset Inflation Managed Fund (SIFAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| BIMPX | SIFAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.36 | 2.03 | -0.67 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.98 | 2.86 | -0.88 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.29 | 1.40 | -0.11 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.85 | 3.49 | -1.63 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.58 | 8.92 | -1.34 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| BIMPX | SIFAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.36 | 2.03 | -0.67 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.40 | 1.25 | -0.85 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.72 | 0.76 | -0.04 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.55 | 0.36 | +0.20 |
Correlation
The correlation between BIMPX and SIFAX is 0.28, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Dividends
BIMPX vs. SIFAX - Dividend Comparison
BIMPX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.76%, more than SIFAX's 4.18% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BIMPX BlackRock 40/60 Target Allocation Fund | 5.76% | 5.68% | 0.00% | 2.96% | 3.06% | 6.35% | 4.34% | 2.66% | 7.95% | 2.50% | 1.83% | 9.76% |
SIFAX SEI Institutional Managed Trust Multi-Asset Inflation Managed Fund | 4.18% | 4.55% | 3.25% | 3.82% | 11.90% | 7.89% | 1.45% | 1.49% | 1.90% | 1.39% | 1.15% | 0.48% |
Drawdowns
BIMPX vs. SIFAX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BIMPX drawdown since its inception was -39.37%, which is greater than SIFAX's maximum drawdown of -23.62%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BIMPX and SIFAX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| BIMPX | SIFAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -39.37% | -23.62% | -15.75% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -6.07% | -3.07% | -3.00% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -19.85% | -8.32% | -11.53% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -19.85% | -14.69% | -5.16% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -4.25% | -0.35% | -3.90% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.82% | -8.65% | +3.83% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.48% | 1.25% | +0.23% |
Volatility
BIMPX vs. SIFAX - Volatility Comparison
BlackRock 40/60 Target Allocation Fund (BIMPX) has a higher volatility of 3.61% compared to SEI Institutional Managed Trust Multi-Asset Inflation Managed Fund (SIFAX) at 2.04%. This indicates that BIMPX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SIFAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| BIMPX | SIFAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.61% | 2.04% | +1.57% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 5.19% | 3.93% | +1.26% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 8.64% | 5.30% | +3.34% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 9.11% | 5.50% | +3.61% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 8.50% | 5.16% | +3.34% |