BIMPX vs. PUDZX
Compare and contrast key facts about BlackRock 40/60 Target Allocation Fund (BIMPX) and PGIM Real Assets Fund (PUDZX).
BIMPX is managed by BlackRock. It was launched on Dec 20, 2006. PUDZX is managed by PGIM. It was launched on Dec 29, 2010.
Performance
BIMPX vs. PUDZX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
BIMPX vs. PUDZX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BIMPX BlackRock 40/60 Target Allocation Fund | -2.85% | 13.43% | 4.93% | 12.41% | -14.84% | 3.51% | 19.76% | 16.65% | -3.77% | 11.77% |
PUDZX PGIM Real Assets Fund | 9.23% | 13.40% | 8.61% | 3.26% | -2.76% | 18.49% | 4.84% | 16.29% | -9.20% | 6.22% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BIMPX achieves a -2.85% return, which is significantly lower than PUDZX's 9.23% return. Over the past 10 years, BIMPX has underperformed PUDZX with an annualized return of 5.96%, while PUDZX has yielded a comparatively higher 6.92% annualized return.
BIMPX
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- -5.20%
- YTD
- -2.85%
- 6M
- -1.39%
- 1Y
- 9.60%
- 3Y*
- 7.77%
- 5Y*
- 3.41%
- 10Y*
- 5.96%
PUDZX
- 1D
- 0.29%
- 1M
- -1.98%
- YTD
- 9.23%
- 6M
- 11.45%
- 1Y
- 18.68%
- 3Y*
- 11.54%
- 5Y*
- 9.22%
- 10Y*
- 6.92%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
BIMPX vs. PUDZX - Expense Ratio Comparison
BIMPX has a 0.11% expense ratio, which is lower than PUDZX's 0.25% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Return for Risk
BIMPX vs. PUDZX — Risk / Return Rank
BIMPX
PUDZX
BIMPX vs. PUDZX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BlackRock 40/60 Target Allocation Fund (BIMPX) and PGIM Real Assets Fund (PUDZX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| BIMPX | PUDZX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.21 | 1.98 | -0.77 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.74 | 2.57 | -0.83 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.26 | 1.40 | -0.14 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.54 | 2.35 | -0.81 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.40 | 13.15 | -6.75 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| BIMPX | PUDZX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.21 | 1.98 | -0.77 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.38 | 0.88 | -0.50 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.70 | 0.72 | -0.01 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.55 | 0.52 | +0.03 |
Correlation
The correlation between BIMPX and PUDZX is 0.66, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Dividends
BIMPX vs. PUDZX - Dividend Comparison
BIMPX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.85%, less than PUDZX's 8.17% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BIMPX BlackRock 40/60 Target Allocation Fund | 5.85% | 5.68% | 0.00% | 2.96% | 3.06% | 6.35% | 4.34% | 2.66% | 7.95% | 2.50% | 1.83% | 9.76% |
PUDZX PGIM Real Assets Fund | 8.17% | 8.93% | 6.67% | 3.66% | 9.10% | 13.00% | 4.94% | 3.40% | 2.14% | 2.10% | 1.39% | 1.72% |
Drawdowns
BIMPX vs. PUDZX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BIMPX drawdown since its inception was -39.37%, which is greater than PUDZX's maximum drawdown of -21.53%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BIMPX and PUDZX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| BIMPX | PUDZX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -39.37% | -21.53% | -17.84% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -6.07% | -8.20% | +2.13% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -19.85% | -17.98% | -1.87% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -19.85% | -21.53% | +1.68% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -5.74% | -2.44% | -3.30% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.82% | -5.31% | +0.49% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.46% | 1.47% | -0.01% |
Volatility
BIMPX vs. PUDZX - Volatility Comparison
BlackRock 40/60 Target Allocation Fund (BIMPX) has a higher volatility of 3.11% compared to PGIM Real Assets Fund (PUDZX) at 2.60%. This indicates that BIMPX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PUDZX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| BIMPX | PUDZX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.11% | 2.60% | +0.51% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 4.95% | 6.24% | -1.29% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 8.52% | 9.70% | -1.18% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 9.08% | 10.58% | -1.50% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 8.49% | 9.70% | -1.21% |