PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BIMPX vs. NASDX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

BIMPX vs. NASDX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in BlackRock 40/60 Target Allocation Fund (BIMPX) and Shelton Capital Management Nasdaq-100 Index Fund Direct Shares (NASDX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BIMPX achieves a 7.15% return, which is significantly lower than NASDX's 21.38% return. Over the past 10 years, BIMPX has underperformed NASDX with an annualized return of 6.87%, while NASDX has yielded a comparatively higher 22.58% annualized return.


BIMPX

1D
0.27%
1M
3.82%
YTD
7.15%
6M
7.40%
1Y
17.31%
3Y*
10.65%
5Y*
4.81%
10Y*
6.87%

NASDX

1D
0.47%
1M
10.94%
YTD
21.38%
6M
19.90%
1Y
42.08%
3Y*
32.65%
5Y*
20.44%
10Y*
22.58%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BIMPX vs. NASDX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
BIMPX
BlackRock 40/60 Target Allocation Fund
7.15%13.43%4.93%12.41%-14.84%3.51%19.76%16.65%-3.77%11.77%
NASDX
Shelton Capital Management Nasdaq-100 Index Fund Direct Shares
21.38%21.00%36.91%54.69%-32.57%27.32%48.59%38.22%-1.21%31.27%

Correlation

The correlation between BIMPX and NASDX is 0.85, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.85

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.79

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.78

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.78

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 27, 2006

0.82

The correlation between BIMPX and NASDX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.78 to 0.85 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BIMPX vs. NASDX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BIMPX
BIMPX Risk / Return Rank: 7373
Overall Rank
BIMPX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7676
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BIMPX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7777
Sortino Ratio Rank
BIMPX Omega Ratio Rank: 7676
Omega Ratio Rank
BIMPX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6464
Calmar Ratio Rank
BIMPX Martin Ratio Rank: 7070
Martin Ratio Rank

NASDX
NASDX Risk / Return Rank: 7575
Overall Rank
NASDX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8484
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NASDX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7171
Sortino Ratio Rank
NASDX Omega Ratio Rank: 6767
Omega Ratio Rank
NASDX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8080
Calmar Ratio Rank
NASDX Martin Ratio Rank: 7575
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BIMPX vs. NASDX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BlackRock 40/60 Target Allocation Fund (BIMPX) and Shelton Capital Management Nasdaq-100 Index Fund Direct Shares (NASDX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


BIMPXNASDXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.17

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.18

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.50

1.46

+0.04

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.08

3.65

-0.57

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

13.47

14.16

-0.69

BIMPX vs. NASDX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BIMPX Sharpe Ratio is 2.52, which is comparable to the NASDX Sharpe Ratio of 2.70. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BIMPX and NASDX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


BIMPXNASDXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.52

2.70

-0.17

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.53

0.89

-0.36

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.80

1.00

-0.20

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.59

0.33

+0.26

Drawdowns

BIMPX vs. NASDX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BIMPX drawdown since its inception was -39.37%, smaller than the maximum NASDX drawdown of -83.16%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BIMPX and NASDX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BIMPXNASDXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-39.37%

-83.16%

+43.79%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-5.74%

-11.90%

+6.16%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-11.11%

-22.71%

+11.60%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-19.85%

-35.33%

+15.48%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-19.85%

-35.33%

+15.48%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.78%

-34.37%

+29.59%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.30%

3.06%

-1.76%

Volatility

BIMPX vs. NASDX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for BlackRock 40/60 Target Allocation Fund (BIMPX) is 2.70%, while Shelton Capital Management Nasdaq-100 Index Fund Direct Shares (NASDX) has a volatility of 4.51%. This indicates that BIMPX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than NASDX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BIMPXNASDXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.70%

4.51%

-1.81%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

5.94%

12.19%

-6.25%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

6.99%

16.10%

-9.11%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

9.19%

23.06%

-13.87%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

8.57%

22.68%

-14.11%

BIMPX vs. NASDX - Expense Ratio Comparison

BIMPX has a 0.11% expense ratio, which is lower than NASDX's 0.63% expense ratio.


Dividends

BIMPX vs. NASDX - Dividend Comparison

BIMPX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.30%, more than NASDX's 2.98% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BIMPX
BlackRock 40/60 Target Allocation Fund
5.30%5.68%0.00%2.96%3.06%6.35%4.34%2.66%7.95%2.50%1.83%9.76%
NASDX
Shelton Capital Management Nasdaq-100 Index Fund Direct Shares
2.98%3.76%16.95%7.61%3.75%2.59%1.28%7.09%2.47%1.65%0.75%0.85%

Frequently Asked Questions


BIMPX and NASDX have a correlation of 0.85, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

NASDX has higher volatility (4.51%) compared to BIMPX (2.70%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BIMPX dropped -39.37% vs NASDX's -83.16%.

NASDX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.70 vs 2.52), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BIMPX and NASDX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer