PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BIMPX vs. MADVX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

BIMPX vs. MADVX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in BlackRock 40/60 Target Allocation Fund (BIMPX) and BlackRock Equity Dividend Fund Institutional Shares (MADVX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BIMPX achieves a 6.06% return, which is significantly lower than MADVX's 17.98% return. Over the past 10 years, BIMPX has underperformed MADVX with an annualized return of 6.53%, while MADVX has yielded a comparatively higher 11.92% annualized return.


BIMPX

1D
0.69%
1M
-0.34%
6M
4.53%
YTD
6.06%
1Y
11.88%
3Y*
9.93%
5Y*
4.32%
10Y*
6.53%
ALL TIME*
6.15%

MADVX

1D
1.38%
1M
3.05%
6M
12.88%
YTD
17.98%
1Y
29.84%
3Y*
17.18%
5Y*
11.66%
10Y*
11.92%
ALL TIME*
10.19%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$0.00$0.00$0.00

BIMPX vs. MADVX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
BIMPX
BlackRock 40/60 Target Allocation Fund
6.06%13.43%4.93%12.41%-14.84%3.51%19.76%16.65%-3.77%11.77%
MADVX
BlackRock Equity Dividend Fund Institutional Shares
17.98%21.70%6.98%12.71%-3.97%20.13%4.03%27.58%-7.15%16.31%

Correlation

The correlation between BIMPX and MADVX is 0.67, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.67

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.63

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.68

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.70

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 26, 2006

0.82

The correlation between BIMPX and MADVX shifts across timeframes, from 0.63 (3 years) to 0.82 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BIMPX vs. MADVX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

BIMPX
BIMPX Risk / Return Rank: 6161
Overall Rank
BIMPX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5959
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BIMPX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6161
Sortino Ratio Rank
BIMPX Omega Ratio Rank: 6161
Omega Ratio Rank
BIMPX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5858
Calmar Ratio Rank
BIMPX Martin Ratio Rank: 6565
Martin Ratio Rank

MADVX
MADVX Risk / Return Rank: 9292
Overall Rank
MADVX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9696
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MADVX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9494
Sortino Ratio Rank
MADVX Omega Ratio Rank: 9191
Omega Ratio Rank
MADVX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8989
Calmar Ratio Rank
MADVX Martin Ratio Rank: 9393
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

BIMPX vs. MADVX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BlackRock 40/60 Target Allocation Fund (BIMPX) and BlackRock Equity Dividend Fund Institutional Shares (MADVX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


BIMPXMADVXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.00

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.27

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.31

1.47

-0.16

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.23

3.47

-1.24

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.10

14.87

-5.77

BIMPX vs. MADVX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BIMPX Sharpe Ratio is 1.65, which is lower than the MADVX Sharpe Ratio of 2.65. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BIMPX and MADVX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

BIMPX vs. MADVX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BIMPX drawdown since its inception was -39.37%, smaller than the maximum MADVX drawdown of -50.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BIMPX and MADVX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BIMPXMADVXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-39.37%

-50.00%

+10.63%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-5.74%

-9.01%

+3.27%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-11.11%

-15.22%

+4.11%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-19.85%

-18.05%

-1.80%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-19.85%

-35.94%

+16.09%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.02%

0.00%

-1.02%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.75%

-5.27%

+0.52%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.40%

2.10%

-0.70%

Volatility

BIMPX vs. MADVX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for BlackRock 40/60 Target Allocation Fund (BIMPX) is 2.44%, while BlackRock Equity Dividend Fund Institutional Shares (MADVX) has a volatility of 3.45%. This indicates that BIMPX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MADVX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BIMPXMADVXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.44%

3.45%

-1.01%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

6.78%

9.51%

-2.73%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

7.79%

11.81%

-4.02%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

9.31%

14.22%

-4.91%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

8.63%

16.31%

-7.68%

BIMPX vs. MADVX - Expense Ratio Comparison

BIMPX has a 0.11% expense ratio, which is lower than MADVX's 0.71% expense ratio.


Dividends

BIMPX vs. MADVX - Dividend Comparison

BIMPX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.36%, less than MADVX's 13.81% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BIMPX
BlackRock 40/60 Target Allocation Fund
5.36%5.68%0.00%2.96%3.06%6.35%4.34%2.66%7.95%2.50%1.83%9.76%
MADVX
BlackRock Equity Dividend Fund Institutional Shares
13.81%10.23%8.58%7.08%13.50%12.15%6.35%13.15%14.04%14.38%7.98%18.44%

Frequently Asked Questions


BIMPX and MADVX have a correlation of 0.67, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

MADVX has higher volatility (3.45%) compared to BIMPX (2.44%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BIMPX dropped -39.37% vs MADVX's -50.00%.

MADVX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.65 vs 1.65), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BIMPX and MADVX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer