PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BILT vs. NFRX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

BILT vs. NFRX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares Infrastructure Active ETF (BILT) and Harrison Street Infrastructure Active ETF (NFRX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


BILT

1D
0.40%
1M
-1.04%
YTD
12.84%
6M
12.40%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

NFRX

1D
0.68%
1M
-2.39%
YTD
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BILT vs. NFRX - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between BILT and NFRX is 0.94, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 2, 2026

0.94

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BILT vs. NFRX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Infrastructure Active ETF (BILT) and Harrison Street Infrastructure Active ETF (NFRX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

BILT vs. NFRX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


BILTNFRXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

2.05

1.23

+0.81

Drawdowns

BILT vs. NFRX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BILT drawdown since its inception was -5.38%, smaller than the maximum NFRX drawdown of -7.26%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BILT and NFRX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BILTNFRXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-5.38%

-7.26%

+1.88%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.97%

-4.08%

+2.11%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.44%

-2.62%

+1.18%

Volatility

BILT vs. NFRX - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BILTNFRXDifference

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.26%

14.31%

-4.05%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

10.26%

14.31%

-4.05%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

10.26%

14.31%

-4.05%

BILT vs. NFRX - Expense Ratio Comparison

BILT has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is lower than NFRX's 0.80% expense ratio.


Dividends

BILT vs. NFRX - Dividend Comparison

BILT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.33%, more than NFRX's 0.22% yield.


Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.94, BILT and NFRX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

On fees, BILT is cheaper at 0.60% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

BILT is cheaper with a 0.60% expense ratio, compared with 0.80% for NFRX.

BILT has the higher dividend yield at 1.33%, compared with 0.22% for NFRX.

They also come from different issuers: iShares and Harrison Street. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for BILT and 0.80% for NFRX.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BILT and NFRX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer