PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BILT vs. ECLN
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

BILT vs. ECLN - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares Infrastructure Active ETF (BILT) and First Trust EIP Carbon Impact ETF (ECLN). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


BILT

1D
0.11%
1M
-1.05%
6M
8.99%
YTD
14.30%
1Y
17.98%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
19.07%

ECLN

1D
1M
6M
YTD
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$2.38M$1.70M$1.65M

BILT vs. ECLN - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025
BILT
iShares Infrastructure Active ETF
14.30%4.16%
ECLN
First Trust EIP Carbon Impact ETF
12.96%1.62%

Correlation

The correlation between BILT and ECLN is 0.74, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.74

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 31, 2025

0.73

The correlation between BILT and ECLN has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.73 to 0.74 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BILT vs. ECLN — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

BILT
BILT Risk / Return Rank: 8181
Overall Rank
BILT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8080
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BILT Sortino Ratio Rank: 7979
Sortino Ratio Rank
BILT Omega Ratio Rank: 7878
Omega Ratio Rank
BILT Calmar Ratio Rank: 8888
Calmar Ratio Rank
BILT Martin Ratio Rank: 8181
Martin Ratio Rank

ECLN

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

BILT vs. ECLN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Infrastructure Active ETF (BILT) and First Trust EIP Carbon Impact ETF (ECLN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


BILTECLNDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.33

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.52

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

10.60

BILT vs. ECLN - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

BILT vs. ECLN - Drawdown Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BILTECLNDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-5.38%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-5.38%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.25%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.36%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.78%

Volatility

BILT vs. ECLN - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BILTECLNDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.10%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.44%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.31%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

10.31%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

10.31%

BILT vs. ECLN - Expense Ratio Comparison

BILT has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is lower than ECLN's 0.97% expense ratio.


Dividends

BILT vs. ECLN - Dividend Comparison

BILT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.70%, while ECLN has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019
BILT
iShares Infrastructure Active ETF
5.70%0.99%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
ECLN
First Trust EIP Carbon Impact ETF
1.43%1.97%2.52%2.54%1.72%1.66%1.68%0.71%

Frequently Asked Questions


BILT and ECLN have a correlation of 0.74, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, BILT is cheaper at 0.60% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

BILT is cheaper with a 0.60% expense ratio, compared with 0.97% for ECLN.

BILT has the higher dividend yield at 5.70%, compared with 1.43% for ECLN.

BILT is categorized as Infrastructure Equities, while ECLN is Utilities Equities. They also come from different issuers: iShares and First Trust. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for BILT and 0.97% for ECLN.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BILT and ECLN

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer