BILT vs. BNO

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

BILT (iShares Infrastructure Active ETF) and BNO (United States Brent Oil Fund LP) are both exchange-traded funds - BILT is a Utilities Equities fund actively managed by iShares, while BNO is a Oil & Gas fund tracking the Front Month Brent Crude Oil. BILT is actively managed, while BNO is passively managed. At a correlation of -0.09, they often move in opposite directions. BILT charges 0.60%/yr vs 0.90%/yr for BNO.

Performance

BILT vs. BNO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares Infrastructure Active ETF (BILT) and United States Brent Oil Fund LP (BNO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BILT achieves a 12.84% return, which is significantly lower than BNO's 85.31% return.

BILT

• 1D: 0.40%
• 1M: -1.04%
• YTD: 12.84%
• 6M: 12.40%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

BNO

• 1D: -2.71%
• 1M: -9.80%
• YTD: 85.31%
• 6M: 79.66%
• 1Y: 88.71%
• 3Y*: 26.74%
• 5Y*: 23.48%
• 10Y*: 13.13%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BILT vs. BNO - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
BILT iShares Infrastructure Active ETF	12.84%	3.99%
BNO United States Brent Oil Fund LP	85.31%	-11.06%

Correlation

The correlation between BILT and BNO is -0.09, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 1, 2025	-0.09

Return for Risk

BILT vs. BNO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BNO

BNO Risk / Return Rank: 65
BNO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 65
BNO Sortino Ratio Rank: 57
BNO Omega Ratio Rank: 61
BNO Calmar Ratio Rank: 88
BNO Martin Ratio Rank: 55

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BILT vs. BNO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Infrastructure Active ETF (BILT) and United States Brent Oil Fund LP (BNO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	BILT	BNO	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	—	2.15	—
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	0.67	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	0.36	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	2.05	0.14	+1.91

Drawdowns

BILT vs. BNO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BILT drawdown since its inception was -5.38%, smaller than the maximum BNO drawdown of -87.06%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BILT and BNO.

Drawdown Indicators

	BILT	BNO	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-5.38%	-87.06%	+81.68%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-17.87%	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-23.75%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-33.70%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-75.18%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.97%	-12.72%	+10.75%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-1.44%	-40.16%	+38.72%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	9.48%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	BILT	BNO	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	14.12%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	36.21%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	10.26%	41.56%	-31.30%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	10.26%	35.40%	-25.14%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	10.26%	36.69%	-26.43%

BILT vs. BNO - Expense Ratio Comparison

BILT has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is lower than BNO's 0.90% expense ratio.

Dividends

BILT vs. BNO - Dividend Comparison

BILT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.33%, while BNO has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025
BILT iShares Infrastructure Active ETF	1.33%	0.99%
BNO United States Brent Oil Fund LP	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both BILT and BNO in my portfolio?

BILT and BNO have a correlation of -0.09, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, BILT or BNO?

On fees, BILT is cheaper at 0.60% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, BILT or BNO?

BILT is cheaper with a 0.60% expense ratio, compared with 0.90% for BNO.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, BILT or BNO?

BILT has the higher dividend yield at 1.33%, compared with 0.00% for BNO.

What is the main difference between BILT and BNO?

BILT is categorized as Utilities Equities, while BNO is Oil & Gas. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Concierge Technologies. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for BILT and 0.90% for BNO.