PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BILI vs. WMT
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

BILI vs. WMT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Bilibili Inc. (BILI) and Walmart Inc. (WMT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BILI achieves a -27.37% return, which is significantly lower than WMT's 9.07% return.


BILI

1D
-2.72%
1M
-12.11%
YTD
-27.37%
6M
-27.40%
1Y
-10.79%
3Y*
1.92%
5Y*
-30.66%
10Y*

WMT

1D
0.45%
1M
-8.62%
YTD
9.07%
6M
4.13%
1Y
29.24%
3Y*
34.18%
5Y*
22.42%
10Y*
19.77%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BILI vs. WMT - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
BILI
Bilibili Inc.
-27.37%35.78%48.81%-48.63%-48.94%-45.87%360.37%27.62%48.88%
WMT
Walmart Inc.
9.07%24.49%73.99%12.88%-0.46%1.97%23.32%30.16%10.16%

Correlation

The correlation between BILI and WMT is -0.05, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.05

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.04

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.06

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 28, 2018

0.07

The correlation between BILI and WMT shifts across timeframes, from -0.05 (1 year) to 0.07 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

BILI:

$8.21B

WMT:

$968.20B

EPS

BILI:

CN¥3.12

WMT:

$2.88

PE Ratio

BILI:

38.79

WMT:

42.04

PS Ratio

BILI:

1.78

WMT:

1.34

PB Ratio

BILI:

3.57

WMT:

10.26

Total Revenue (TTM)

BILI:

CN¥30.77B

WMT:

$725.31B

Gross Profit (TTM)

BILI:

CN¥11.33B

WMT:

$181.16B

EBITDA (TTM)

BILI:

CN¥1.53B

WMT:

$44.32B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BILI vs. WMT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BILI
BILI Risk / Return Rank: 3131
Overall Rank
BILI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3131
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BILI Sortino Ratio Rank: 3030
Sortino Ratio Rank
BILI Omega Ratio Rank: 3030
Omega Ratio Rank
BILI Calmar Ratio Rank: 3434
Calmar Ratio Rank
BILI Martin Ratio Rank: 3232
Martin Ratio Rank

WMT
WMT Risk / Return Rank: 7676
Overall Rank
WMT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7878
Sharpe Ratio Rank
WMT Sortino Ratio Rank: 7373
Sortino Ratio Rank
WMT Omega Ratio Rank: 7474
Omega Ratio Rank
WMT Calmar Ratio Rank: 7575
Calmar Ratio Rank
WMT Martin Ratio Rank: 8080
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BILI vs. WMT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Bilibili Inc. (BILI) and Walmart Inc. (WMT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


BILIWMTDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.50

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.87

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.99

1.23

-0.24

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.27

1.83

-2.10

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-0.60

5.82

-6.42

BILI vs. WMT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BILI Sharpe Ratio is -0.28, which is lower than the WMT Sharpe Ratio of 1.22. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BILI and WMT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

BILI vs. WMT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BILI drawdown since its inception was -94.30%, which is greater than WMT's maximum drawdown of -77.14%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BILI and WMT.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BILIWMTDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-94.30%

-77.14%

-17.16%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-52.06%

-15.75%

-36.31%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-53.12%

-21.93%

-31.19%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-92.97%

-25.74%

-67.23%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-25.74%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-88.58%

-9.81%

-78.77%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-57.96%

-14.63%

-43.33%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

23.32%

4.94%

+18.38%

Volatility

BILI vs. WMT - Volatility Comparison

Bilibili Inc. (BILI) has a higher volatility of 18.55% compared to Walmart Inc. (WMT) at 9.86%. This indicates that BILI's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than WMT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BILIWMTDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

18.55%

9.86%

+8.69%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

36.58%

18.49%

+18.09%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

49.74%

23.67%

+26.07%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

79.14%

21.68%

+57.46%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

73.93%

21.73%

+52.20%

Dividends

BILI vs. WMT - Dividend Comparison

BILI has not paid dividends to shareholders, while WMT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.80%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BILI
Bilibili Inc.
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
WMT
Walmart Inc.
0.80%0.84%0.92%1.45%1.58%1.52%1.50%1.78%2.23%2.07%2.89%3.20%

Financials

BILI vs. WMT - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Bilibili Inc. and Walmart Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.0050.00B100.00B150.00B200.00B20222023202420252026
7.43B
177.75B
(BILI) Total Revenue
(WMT) Total Revenue
Please note, different currencies. BILI values in CNY, WMT values in USD

BILI vs. WMT - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Bilibili Inc. and Walmart Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

15.0%20.0%25.0%30.0%35.0%20222023202420252026
37.1%
25.1%
Portfolio components
BILI - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Bilibili Inc. reported a gross profit of 2.76B and revenue of 7.43B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 37.1%.

WMT - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Walmart Inc. reported a gross profit of 44.69B and revenue of 177.75B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 25.1%.

BILI - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Bilibili Inc. reported an operating income of 165.75M and revenue of 7.43B, resulting in an operating margin of 2.2%.

WMT - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Walmart Inc. reported an operating income of 7.49B and revenue of 177.75B, resulting in an operating margin of 4.2%.

BILI - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Bilibili Inc. reported a net income of 208.51M and revenue of 7.43B, resulting in a net margin of 2.8%.

WMT - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Walmart Inc. reported a net income of 5.65B and revenue of 177.75B, resulting in a net margin of 3.2%.


Frequently Asked Questions


BILI and WMT have a correlation of -0.05, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

BILI has higher volatility (18.55%) compared to WMT (9.86%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BILI dropped -94.30% vs WMT's -77.14%.

WMT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.22 vs -0.28), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BILI and WMT

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer