BILDX vs. RCS
BILDX (DoubleLine Infrastructure Income Fund) and RCS (PIMCO Strategic Income Fund) are both Intermediate Core-Plus Bond funds. Over the past 5 years, BILDX returned 1.37%/yr vs 0.68%/yr for RCS. Their 0.12 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship.
Performance
BILDX vs. RCS - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BILDX achieves a 0.31% return, which is significantly higher than RCS's -0.92% return.
BILDX
- 1D
- -0.11%
- 1M
- -0.85%
- 6M
- -0.07%
- YTD
- 0.31%
- 1Y
- 2.70%
- 3Y*
- 5.85%
- 5Y*
- 1.37%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 2.92%
RCS
- 1D
- 1.55%
- 1M
- -4.00%
- 6M
- -8.30%
- YTD
- -0.92%
- 1Y
- -19.96%
- 3Y*
- 6.69%
- 5Y*
- 0.68%
- 10Y*
- 2.85%
- ALL TIME*
- 6.17%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $0.00 | $0.00 | $0.00 | |
| $707.45K | $672.81K | $742.33K |
BILDX vs. RCS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BILDX DoubleLine Infrastructure Income Fund | 0.31% | 7.59% | 4.41% | 8.89% | -11.54% | 0.14% | 5.48% | 8.30% | 0.39% | 5.66% |
RCS PIMCO Strategic Income Fund | -0.92% | -21.48% | 37.47% | 37.60% | -18.72% | 6.33% | -16.19% | 1.62% | 15.51% | 14.39% |
Correlation
The correlation between BILDX and RCS is 0.10, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.10 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.19 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.20 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 3, 2017 | 0.12 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BILDX vs. RCS — Risk / Return Rank
BILDX
RCS
BILDX vs. RCS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for DoubleLine Infrastructure Income Fund (BILDX) and PIMCO Strategic Income Fund (RCS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| BILDX | RCS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.92 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +2.72 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.19 | 0.87 | +0.33 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.52 | -0.61 | +2.13 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.55 | -0.92 | +5.47 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
BILDX vs. RCS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BILDX drawdown since its inception was -15.68%, smaller than the maximum RCS drawdown of -46.69%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BILDX and RCS.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BILDX | RCS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -15.68% | -46.69% | +31.01% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -2.21% | -32.94% | +30.73% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -3.14% | -32.94% | +29.80% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -15.53% | -36.18% | +20.65% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -46.69% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.21% | -29.32% | +28.11% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.96% | -9.48% | +6.52% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.74% | 21.75% | -21.01% |
Volatility
BILDX vs. RCS - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for DoubleLine Infrastructure Income Fund (BILDX) is 0.84%, while PIMCO Strategic Income Fund (RCS) has a volatility of 3.44%. This indicates that BILDX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than RCS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BILDX | RCS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.84% | 3.44% | -2.60% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.39% | 16.51% | -14.12% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.08% | 24.32% | -21.24% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 4.43% | 25.23% | -20.80% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 4.08% | 25.81% | -21.73% |
Dividends
BILDX vs. RCS - Dividend Comparison
BILDX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.57%, less than RCS's 9.14% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BILDX DoubleLine Infrastructure Income Fund | 4.57% | 4.64% | 4.11% | 3.42% | 3.31% | 3.45% | 2.89% | 3.40% | 3.18% | 3.22% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
RCS PIMCO Strategic Income Fund | 9.14% | 8.62% | 8.03% | 10.07% | 12.39% | 9.01% | 9.57% | 8.44% | 8.93% | 9.50% | 10.92% | 11.17% |
Frequently Asked Questions
BILDX and RCS have a correlation of 0.10, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
RCS has higher volatility (3.44%) compared to BILDX (0.84%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BILDX dropped -15.68% vs RCS's -46.69%.
BILDX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.09 vs -0.83), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for BILDX and RCS
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer