BILDX vs. RCS
BILDX (DoubleLine Infrastructure Income Fund) and RCS (PIMCO Strategic Income Fund) are both Intermediate Core-Plus Bond funds. Over the past 5 years, BILDX returned 1.71%/yr vs 1.88%/yr for RCS. At a 0.12 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
BILDX vs. RCS - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BILDX achieves a 0.75% return, which is significantly higher than RCS's -0.34% return.
BILDX
- 1D
- -0.32%
- 1M
- 0.41%
- YTD
- 0.75%
- 6M
- 0.90%
- 1Y
- 4.78%
- 3Y*
- 5.98%
- 5Y*
- 1.71%
- 10Y*
- —
RCS
- 1D
- -1.12%
- 1M
- -0.76%
- YTD
- -0.34%
- 6M
- -11.33%
- 1Y
- -16.21%
- 3Y*
- 9.48%
- 5Y*
- 1.88%
- 10Y*
- 3.31%
BILDX vs. RCS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BILDX DoubleLine Infrastructure Income Fund | 0.75% | 7.59% | 4.41% | 8.89% | -11.54% | 0.14% | 5.48% | 8.30% | 0.39% | 5.66% |
RCS PIMCO Strategic Income Fund | -0.34% | -21.48% | 37.47% | 37.60% | -18.72% | 6.33% | -16.19% | 1.62% | 15.51% | 14.39% |
Correlation
The correlation between BILDX and RCS is 0.13, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.13 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.20 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.20 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 3, 2017 | 0.12 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BILDX vs. RCS — Risk / Return Rank
BILDX
RCS
BILDX vs. RCS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for DoubleLine Infrastructure Income Fund (BILDX) and PIMCO Strategic Income Fund (RCS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| BILDX | RCS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +2.32 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +3.35 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.30 | 0.89 | +0.41 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.27 | -0.49 | +2.77 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.15 | -0.83 | +7.98 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
BILDX vs. RCS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BILDX drawdown since its inception was -15.68%, smaller than the maximum RCS drawdown of -46.69%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BILDX and RCS.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BILDX | RCS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -15.68% | -46.69% | +31.01% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -2.21% | -32.94% | +30.73% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -3.31% | -32.94% | +29.63% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -15.68% | -36.18% | +20.50% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -46.69% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.78% | -28.91% | +28.13% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.98% | -9.41% | +6.43% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.70% | 19.49% | -18.79% |
Volatility
BILDX vs. RCS - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for DoubleLine Infrastructure Income Fund (BILDX) is 0.94%, while PIMCO Strategic Income Fund (RCS) has a volatility of 6.00%. This indicates that BILDX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than RCS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BILDX | RCS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.94% | 6.00% | -5.06% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.28% | 20.85% | -18.57% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.08% | 23.84% | -20.76% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 4.42% | 25.23% | -20.81% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 4.09% | 25.83% | -21.74% |
Dividends
BILDX vs. RCS - Dividend Comparison
BILDX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.94%, less than RCS's 9.02% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BILDX DoubleLine Infrastructure Income Fund | 4.94% | 4.64% | 4.11% | 3.42% | 3.31% | 3.45% | 2.89% | 3.40% | 3.18% | 3.22% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
RCS PIMCO Strategic Income Fund | 9.02% | 8.62% | 8.03% | 10.07% | 12.39% | 9.01% | 9.57% | 8.44% | 8.93% | 9.50% | 10.92% | 11.17% |
Frequently Asked Questions
BILDX and RCS have a correlation of 0.13, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
RCS has higher volatility (6.00%) compared to BILDX (0.94%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BILDX dropped -15.68% vs RCS's -46.69%.
BILDX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.63 vs -0.68), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for BILDX and RCS
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer