BILD vs. ISCMF
BILD (Macquarie Global Listed Infrastructure ETF) and ISCMF (iShares Diversified Commodity Swap UCITS ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - BILD is a Energy Equities fund actively managed by Macquarie, while ISCMF is a Commodities fund tracking the Bloomberg Commodity Index. BILD is actively managed, while ISCMF is passively managed. Over the past year, BILD returned 16.87% vs 31.30% for ISCMF. At a correlation of -0.01, they often move in opposite directions. BILD charges 0.49%/yr vs 0.19%/yr for ISCMF.
Performance
BILD vs. ISCMF - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BILD achieves a 7.50% return, which is significantly lower than ISCMF's 22.87% return.
BILD
- 1D
- 0.52%
- 1M
- -2.01%
- YTD
- 7.50%
- 6M
- 8.26%
- 1Y
- 16.87%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
ISCMF
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- -4.99%
- YTD
- 22.87%
- 6M
- 22.87%
- 1Y
- 31.30%
- 3Y*
- 16.78%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
BILD vs. ISCMF - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
BILD Macquarie Global Listed Infrastructure ETF | 7.50% | 21.08% | -2.68% | 3.73% |
ISCMF iShares Diversified Commodity Swap UCITS ETF | 22.87% | 19.65% | 3.13% | -5.12% |
Correlation
The correlation between BILD and ISCMF is -0.09, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.09 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 29, 2023 | -0.01 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BILD vs. ISCMF — Risk / Return Rank
BILD
ISCMF
BILD vs. ISCMF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Macquarie Global Listed Infrastructure ETF (BILD) and iShares Diversified Commodity Swap UCITS ETF (ISCMF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| BILD | ISCMF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.20 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.08 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.28 | 2.31 | -1.03 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.80 | 5.53 | -2.73 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.20 | 11.95 | -4.75 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
BILD vs. ISCMF - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BILD drawdown since its inception was -14.78%, smaller than the maximum ISCMF drawdown of -25.42%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BILD and ISCMF.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BILD | ISCMF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -14.78% | -25.42% | +10.64% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -6.05% | -5.69% | -0.36% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -7.62% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -4.82% | -5.26% | +0.44% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.72% | -13.36% | +9.64% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.35% | 2.63% | -0.28% |
Volatility
BILD vs. ISCMF - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Macquarie Global Listed Infrastructure ETF (BILD) is 2.99%, while iShares Diversified Commodity Swap UCITS ETF (ISCMF) has a volatility of 5.11%. This indicates that BILD experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ISCMF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BILD | ISCMF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.99% | 5.11% | -2.12% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.89% | 15.45% | -6.56% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 10.88% | 17.87% | -6.99% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 13.16% | 14.29% | -1.13% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 13.16% | 14.29% | -1.13% |
BILD vs. ISCMF - Expense Ratio Comparison
BILD has a 0.49% expense ratio, which is higher than ISCMF's 0.19% expense ratio.
Dividends
BILD vs. ISCMF - Dividend Comparison
BILD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.81%, while ISCMF has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
BILD Macquarie Global Listed Infrastructure ETF | 5.81% | 3.05% | 5.53% | 0.52% |
ISCMF iShares Diversified Commodity Swap UCITS ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
BILD and ISCMF have a correlation of -0.09, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
ISCMF has higher volatility (5.11%) compared to BILD (2.99%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BILD dropped -14.78% vs ISCMF's -25.42%.
On 1-year performance, ISCMF leads with 31.30% vs 16.87% for BILD. On fees, ISCMF is cheaper at 0.19% per year. On volatility, BILD has been the lower-risk option at 2.99%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, ISCMF has performed better with a 31.30% return vs 16.87%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
ISCMF is cheaper with a 0.19% expense ratio, compared with 0.49% for BILD.
BILD has the higher dividend yield at 5.81%, compared with 0.00% for ISCMF.
BILD is categorized as Energy Equities, while ISCMF is Commodities. They also come from different issuers: Macquarie and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.49% for BILD and 0.19% for ISCMF.
ISCMF currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.76 vs 1.56), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for BILD and ISCMF
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer