BIL vs. XHLF
Compare and contrast key facts about SPDR Barclays 1-3 Month T-Bill ETF (BIL) and BondBloxx Bloomberg Six Month Target Duration US Treasury ETF (XHLF).
BIL and XHLF are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. BIL is a passively managed fund by State Street that tracks the performance of the Barclays Capital U.S. 1-3 Month Treasury Bill Index. It was launched on May 25, 2007. XHLF is a passively managed fund by BondBloxx that tracks the performance of the Bloomberg US Treasury 6 Month Duration Index. It was launched on Sep 13, 2022. Both BIL and XHLF are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Performance
BIL vs. XHLF - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
BIL vs. XHLF - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BIL SPDR Barclays 1-3 Month T-Bill ETF | 0.88% | 4.15% | 5.19% | 4.94% | 0.94% |
XHLF BondBloxx Bloomberg Six Month Target Duration US Treasury ETF | 0.78% | 4.21% | 5.04% | 4.90% | 0.96% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BIL achieves a 0.88% return, which is significantly higher than XHLF's 0.78% return.
BIL
- 1D
- 0.03%
- 1M
- 0.30%
- YTD
- 0.88%
- 6M
- 1.84%
- 1Y
- 4.00%
- 3Y*
- 4.71%
- 5Y*
- 3.28%
- 10Y*
- 2.13%
XHLF
- 1D
- 0.01%
- 1M
- 0.23%
- YTD
- 0.78%
- 6M
- 1.76%
- 1Y
- 3.95%
- 3Y*
- 4.61%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
BIL vs. XHLF - Expense Ratio Comparison
BIL has a 0.14% expense ratio, which is higher than XHLF's 0.03% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Return for Risk
BIL vs. XHLF — Risk / Return Rank
BIL
XHLF
BIL vs. XHLF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR Barclays 1-3 Month T-Bill ETF (BIL) and BondBloxx Bloomberg Six Month Target Duration US Treasury ETF (XHLF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| BIL | XHLF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 19.52 | 12.09 | +7.43 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 254.20 | 39.75 | +214.45 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 180.39 | 9.67 | +170.72 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 368.00 | 99.61 | +268.39 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4,131.71 | 605.40 | +3,526.32 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| BIL | XHLF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 19.52 | 12.09 | +7.43 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 12.55 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 8.23 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 2.73 | 10.74 | -8.01 |
Correlation
The correlation between BIL and XHLF is 0.40, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Dividends
BIL vs. XHLF - Dividend Comparison
BIL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.96%, more than XHLF's 3.88% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BIL SPDR Barclays 1-3 Month T-Bill ETF | 3.96% | 4.13% | 5.03% | 4.92% | 1.35% | 0.00% | 0.30% | 2.05% | 1.66% | 0.68% | 0.07% |
XHLF BondBloxx Bloomberg Six Month Target Duration US Treasury ETF | 3.88% | 3.98% | 4.96% | 4.50% | 0.86% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
BIL vs. XHLF - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BIL drawdown since its inception was -0.78%, which is greater than XHLF's maximum drawdown of -0.11%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BIL and XHLF.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| BIL | XHLF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -0.78% | -0.11% | -0.67% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -0.01% | -0.04% | +0.03% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -0.12% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -0.21% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.26% | 0.00% | -0.26% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.00% | 0.01% | -0.01% |
Volatility
BIL vs. XHLF - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for SPDR Barclays 1-3 Month T-Bill ETF (BIL) is 0.06%, while BondBloxx Bloomberg Six Month Target Duration US Treasury ETF (XHLF) has a volatility of 0.09%. This indicates that BIL experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than XHLF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| BIL | XHLF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.06% | 0.09% | -0.03% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 0.14% | 0.21% | -0.07% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.21% | 0.33% | -0.12% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 0.26% | 0.42% | -0.16% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 0.26% | 0.42% | -0.16% |