PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BIL vs. PSCC
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

BIL vs. PSCC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in SPDR Bloomberg 1-3 Month T-Bill ETF (BIL) and Invesco S&P SmallCap Consumer Staples ETF (PSCC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BIL achieves a 1.53% return, which is significantly lower than PSCC's 7.16% return. Over the past 10 years, BIL has underperformed PSCC with an annualized return of 2.18%, while PSCC has yielded a comparatively higher 6.30% annualized return.


BIL

1D
0.04%
1M
0.28%
YTD
1.53%
6M
1.78%
1Y
3.87%
3Y*
4.64%
5Y*
3.42%
10Y*
2.18%

PSCC

1D
1.46%
1M
0.51%
YTD
7.16%
6M
6.18%
1Y
-2.82%
3Y*
-1.02%
5Y*
-0.20%
10Y*
6.30%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BIL vs. PSCC - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
BIL
SPDR Bloomberg 1-3 Month T-Bill ETF
1.53%4.15%5.19%4.94%1.40%-0.10%0.40%2.03%1.74%0.69%
PSCC
Invesco S&P SmallCap Consumer Staples ETF
7.16%-16.47%0.98%14.83%-6.66%28.82%11.17%17.39%-6.72%9.72%

Correlation

The correlation between BIL and PSCC is -0.04, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.04

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

-0.03

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.02

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

-0.01

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 8, 2010

-0.03

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BIL vs. PSCC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BIL
BIL Risk / Return Rank: 100100
Overall Rank
BIL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 100100
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BIL Sortino Ratio Rank: 100100
Sortino Ratio Rank
BIL Omega Ratio Rank: 100100
Omega Ratio Rank
BIL Calmar Ratio Rank: 100100
Calmar Ratio Rank
BIL Martin Ratio Rank: 100100
Martin Ratio Rank

PSCC
PSCC Risk / Return Rank: 88
Overall Rank
PSCC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 88
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PSCC Sortino Ratio Rank: 88
Sortino Ratio Rank
PSCC Omega Ratio Rank: 88
Omega Ratio Rank
PSCC Calmar Ratio Rank: 88
Calmar Ratio Rank
PSCC Martin Ratio Rank: 88
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BIL vs. PSCC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR Bloomberg 1-3 Month T-Bill ETF (BIL) and Invesco S&P SmallCap Consumer Staples ETF (PSCC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


BILPSCCDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+19.80

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+175.71

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

88.66

0.99

+87.66

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

358.48

-0.13

+358.61

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2,842.59

-0.22

+2,842.80

BIL vs. PSCC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BIL Sharpe Ratio is 19.68, which is higher than the PSCC Sharpe Ratio of -0.12. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BIL and PSCC, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


BILPSCCDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

19.68

-0.12

+19.80

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

13.16

-0.01

+13.17

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

8.52

0.33

+8.20

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

2.78

0.56

+2.22

Drawdowns

BIL vs. PSCC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BIL drawdown since its inception was -0.78%, smaller than the maximum PSCC drawdown of -33.61%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BIL and PSCC.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BILPSCCDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-0.78%

-33.61%

+32.83%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-0.01%

-15.17%

+15.16%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-0.01%

-23.36%

+23.35%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-0.09%

-23.36%

+23.27%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-0.21%

-33.61%

+33.40%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-16.33%

+16.33%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.26%

-5.98%

+5.72%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.00%

8.68%

-8.68%

Volatility

BIL vs. PSCC - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for SPDR Bloomberg 1-3 Month T-Bill ETF (BIL) is 0.06%, while Invesco S&P SmallCap Consumer Staples ETF (PSCC) has a volatility of 4.71%. This indicates that BIL experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PSCC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BILPSCCDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.06%

4.71%

-4.65%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

0.14%

10.80%

-10.66%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.20%

16.50%

-16.30%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

0.26%

18.24%

-17.98%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

0.26%

19.29%

-19.03%

BIL vs. PSCC - Expense Ratio Comparison

BIL has a 0.14% expense ratio, which is lower than PSCC's 0.29% expense ratio.


Dividends

BIL vs. PSCC - Dividend Comparison

BIL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.86%, more than PSCC's 2.08% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BIL
SPDR Bloomberg 1-3 Month T-Bill ETF
3.86%4.13%5.03%4.92%1.35%0.00%0.30%2.05%1.66%0.68%0.07%0.00%
PSCC
Invesco S&P SmallCap Consumer Staples ETF
2.08%2.35%1.88%1.49%1.29%1.21%1.59%1.77%0.94%1.25%1.48%1.34%

Frequently Asked Questions


BIL and PSCC have a correlation of -0.04, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

PSCC has higher volatility (4.71%) compared to BIL (0.06%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BIL dropped -0.78% vs PSCC's -33.61%.

On 10-year performance, PSCC leads with 6.30% vs 2.18% for BIL. On fees, BIL is cheaper at 0.14% per year. On volatility, BIL has been the lower-risk option at 0.06%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, PSCC has performed better with a 6.30% return vs 2.18%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

BIL is cheaper with a 0.14% expense ratio, compared with 0.29% for PSCC.

BIL has the higher dividend yield at 3.86%, compared with 2.08% for PSCC.

BIL is categorized as Government Bonds, while PSCC is Consumer Staples Equities. BIL tracks Bloomberg 1-3 Month U.S. Treasury Bill Index, while PSCC tracks S&P Small Cap 600 Capped Consumer Staples. They also come from different issuers: State Street and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.14% for BIL and 0.29% for PSCC.

BIL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (19.68 vs -0.12), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BIL and PSCC

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer