BIIPX vs. FASGX

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

BIIPX (iShares Short-Term TIPS Bond Index Fund) and FASGX (Fidelity Asset Manager 70% Fund) are both mutual funds - BIIPX is a Inflation-Protected Bonds fund managed by BlackRock, while FASGX is a Diversified Portfolio fund managed by BlackRock. Over the past 5 years, BIIPX returned 2.84%/yr vs 8.47%/yr for FASGX. At a 0.15 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. BIIPX charges 0.08%/yr vs 0.67%/yr for FASGX.

Performance

BIIPX vs. FASGX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares Short-Term TIPS Bond Index Fund (BIIPX) and Fidelity Asset Manager 70% Fund (FASGX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BIIPX achieves a 1.98% return, which is significantly lower than FASGX's 11.93% return.

BIIPX

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: 0.12%
• YTD: 1.98%
• 6M: 2.04%
• 1Y: 4.68%
• 3Y*: 5.00%
• 5Y*: 2.84%
• 10Y*: —

FASGX

• 1D: 0.51%
• 1M: 4.40%
• YTD: 11.93%
• 6M: 12.90%
• 1Y: 26.54%
• 3Y*: 16.47%
• 5Y*: 8.47%
• 10Y*: 10.01%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BIIPX vs. FASGX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
BIIPX iShares Short-Term TIPS Bond Index Fund	1.98%	6.05%	4.75%	3.25%	-4.12%	5.19%	4.89%	4.83%	0.58%	0.88%
FASGX Fidelity Asset Manager 70% Fund	11.93%	18.23%	10.81%	16.45%	-16.83%	13.98%	17.19%	22.81%	-7.65%	16.68%

Correlation

The correlation between BIIPX and FASGX is 0.05, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.05
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.17
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.19
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 4, 2017	0.15

The correlation between BIIPX and FASGX shifts across timeframes, from 0.05 (1 year) to 0.19 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

BIIPX vs. FASGX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BIIPX

BIIPX Risk / Return Rank: 75
BIIPX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 47
BIIPX Sortino Ratio Rank: 83
BIIPX Omega Ratio Rank: 76
BIIPX Calmar Ratio Rank: 82
BIIPX Martin Ratio Rank: 85

FASGX

FASGX Risk / Return Rank: 77
FASGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 80
FASGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 76
FASGX Omega Ratio Rank: 74
FASGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 75
FASGX Martin Ratio Rank: 80

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BIIPX vs. FASGX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Short-Term TIPS Bond Index Fund (BIIPX) and Fidelity Asset Manager 70% Fund (FASGX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	BIIPX	FASGX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.03	2.61	-0.58
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.96	3.64	+0.32
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.50	1.49	+0.01
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.76	3.39	+0.37
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	16.24	14.98	+1.26
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

BIIPX vs. FASGX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BIIPX Sharpe Ratio is 2.03, which is comparable to the FASGX Sharpe Ratio of 2.61. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BIIPX and FASGX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	BIIPX	FASGX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.03	2.61	-0.58
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.92	0.69	+0.22
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	0.79	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	1.12	0.63	+0.49

Drawdowns

BIIPX vs. FASGX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BIIPX drawdown since its inception was -6.46%, smaller than the maximum FASGX drawdown of -47.35%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BIIPX and FASGX.

Drawdown Indicators

	BIIPX	FASGX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-6.46%	-47.35%	+40.89%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-1.22%	-7.95%	+6.73%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-1.22%	-12.80%	+11.58%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-6.46%	-23.54%	+17.08%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-27.20%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-1.08%	-6.71%	+5.63%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.28%	1.79%	-1.51%

Volatility

BIIPX vs. FASGX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares Short-Term TIPS Bond Index Fund (BIIPX) is 1.21%, while Fidelity Asset Manager 70% Fund (FASGX) has a volatility of 3.30%. This indicates that BIIPX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FASGX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	BIIPX	FASGX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	1.21%	3.30%	-2.09%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	1.67%	8.39%	-6.72%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.27%	10.34%	-8.07%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	3.11%	12.27%	-9.16%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	2.64%	12.65%	-10.01%

BIIPX vs. FASGX - Expense Ratio Comparison

BIIPX has a 0.08% expense ratio, which is lower than FASGX's 0.67% expense ratio.

Dividends

BIIPX vs. FASGX - Dividend Comparison

BIIPX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.59%, less than FASGX's 6.55% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
BIIPX iShares Short-Term TIPS Bond Index Fund	4.59%	4.64%	4.30%	2.65%	4.56%	4.39%	1.58%	2.27%	2.74%	1.89%	0.00%	0.00%
FASGX Fidelity Asset Manager 70% Fund	6.55%	7.33%	4.60%	1.72%	6.69%	2.73%	2.20%	5.19%	6.31%	2.75%	0.20%	5.58%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both BIIPX and FASGX in my portfolio?

BIIPX and FASGX have a correlation of 0.05, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, BIIPX or FASGX?

FASGX has higher volatility (3.30%) compared to BIIPX (1.21%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BIIPX dropped -6.46% vs FASGX's -47.35%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

FASGX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.61 vs 2.03), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.