BIICX vs. FASGX
Compare and contrast key facts about BlackRock Multi-Asset Income Portfolio (BIICX) and Fidelity Asset Manager 70% Fund (FASGX).
BIICX is managed by BlackRock. It was launched on Apr 6, 2008. FASGX is managed by BlackRock. It was launched on Dec 30, 1991.
Performance
BIICX vs. FASGX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
BIICX vs. FASGX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BIICX BlackRock Multi-Asset Income Portfolio | -0.72% | 11.80% | 7.64% | 9.46% | -12.29% | 6.94% | 6.61% | 13.89% | -3.55% | 9.06% |
FASGX Fidelity Asset Manager 70% Fund | -0.70% | 18.23% | 10.81% | 16.45% | -16.83% | 13.98% | 17.19% | 22.81% | -7.65% | 17.34% |
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with BIICX having a -0.72% return and FASGX slightly higher at -0.70%. Over the past 10 years, BIICX has underperformed FASGX with an annualized return of 5.22%, while FASGX has yielded a comparatively higher 8.96% annualized return.
BIICX
- 1D
- 0.97%
- 1M
- -3.35%
- YTD
- -0.72%
- 6M
- 0.84%
- 1Y
- 8.69%
- 3Y*
- 8.20%
- 5Y*
- 3.68%
- 10Y*
- 5.22%
FASGX
- 1D
- 2.36%
- 1M
- -4.75%
- YTD
- -0.70%
- 6M
- 1.92%
- 1Y
- 17.75%
- 3Y*
- 12.59%
- 5Y*
- 6.64%
- 10Y*
- 8.96%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
BIICX vs. FASGX - Expense Ratio Comparison
BIICX has a 0.55% expense ratio, which is lower than FASGX's 0.67% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
BIICX vs. FASGX — Risk / Return Rank
BIICX
FASGX
BIICX vs. FASGX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BlackRock Multi-Asset Income Portfolio (BIICX) and Fidelity Asset Manager 70% Fund (FASGX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| BIICX | FASGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.41 | 1.41 | 0.00 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.95 | 2.01 | -0.06 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.28 | 1.30 | -0.01 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.92 | 2.00 | -0.08 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.49 | 8.74 | -1.25 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| BIICX | FASGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.41 | 1.41 | 0.00 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.59 | 0.55 | +0.05 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.87 | 0.71 | +0.16 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.71 | 0.60 | +0.11 |
Correlation
The correlation between BIICX and FASGX is 0.85, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
BIICX vs. FASGX - Dividend Comparison
BIICX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.16%, less than FASGX's 7.39% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BIICX BlackRock Multi-Asset Income Portfolio | 6.16% | 6.50% | 6.27% | 4.40% | 4.44% | 5.13% | 4.32% | 4.94% | 5.52% | 4.85% | 4.95% | 5.61% |
FASGX Fidelity Asset Manager 70% Fund | 7.39% | 7.33% | 4.60% | 1.72% | 6.69% | 2.73% | 2.20% | 5.19% | 6.31% | 2.75% | 0.20% | 5.58% |
Drawdowns
BIICX vs. FASGX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BIICX drawdown since its inception was -33.25%, smaller than the maximum FASGX drawdown of -47.35%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BIICX and FASGX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| BIICX | FASGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -33.25% | -47.35% | +14.10% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -4.99% | -9.07% | +4.08% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -17.51% | -23.54% | +6.03% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -19.72% | -27.20% | +7.48% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.88% | -5.77% | +1.89% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.68% | -6.74% | +3.06% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.28% | 2.07% | -0.79% |
Volatility
BIICX vs. FASGX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for BlackRock Multi-Asset Income Portfolio (BIICX) is 2.60%, while Fidelity Asset Manager 70% Fund (FASGX) has a volatility of 5.30%. This indicates that BIICX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FASGX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| BIICX | FASGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.60% | 5.30% | -2.70% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 3.81% | 8.12% | -4.31% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 6.31% | 13.00% | -6.69% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 6.22% | 12.18% | -5.96% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 6.02% | 12.58% | -6.56% |