PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BIGY vs. RYLD
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

BIGY vs. RYLD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in YieldMax Target 12™ Big 50 Option Income ETF (BIGY) and Global X Russell 2000 Covered Call ETF (RYLD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BIGY achieves a 6.66% return, which is significantly lower than RYLD's 8.33% return.


BIGY

1D
-0.54%
1M
4.24%
YTD
6.66%
6M
6.71%
1Y
25.59%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

RYLD

1D
-0.19%
1M
2.78%
YTD
8.33%
6M
9.14%
1Y
21.47%
3Y*
7.45%
5Y*
2.69%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BIGY vs. RYLD - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
BIGY
YieldMax Target 12™ Big 50 Option Income ETF
6.66%19.14%0.22%
RYLD
Global X Russell 2000 Covered Call ETF
8.33%5.65%-0.15%

Correlation

The correlation between BIGY and RYLD is 0.64, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.64

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 22, 2024

0.69

The correlation between BIGY and RYLD has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.64 to 0.69 - a consistent structural relationship.

BIGY vs. RYLD - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
BIGY
RYLD

Technology

34.5%
16.8%

Communication Services

12.1%
2.5%

Financial Services

11.8%
104.9%

Consumer Defensive

11.4%
2.4%

Healthcare

10.8%
16.5%

Consumer Cyclical

10.2%
8.4%

Energy

4.5%
6.2%

Industrials

4.4%
17.5%

Basic Materials

-

4.8%

Real Estate

-

6.2%

Utilities

-

2.9%

Technology

BIGY
34.5%
RYLD
16.8%

Communication Services

BIGY
12.1%
RYLD
2.5%

Financial Services

BIGY
11.8%
RYLD
104.9%

Consumer Defensive

BIGY
11.4%
RYLD
2.4%

Healthcare

BIGY
10.8%
RYLD
16.5%

Consumer Cyclical

BIGY
10.2%
RYLD
8.4%

Energy

BIGY
4.5%
RYLD
6.2%

Industrials

BIGY
4.4%
RYLD
17.5%

Basic Materials

BIGY

-

RYLD
4.8%

Real Estate

BIGY

-

RYLD
6.2%

Utilities

BIGY

-

RYLD
2.9%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BIGY vs. RYLD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BIGY
BIGY Risk / Return Rank: 6969
Overall Rank
BIGY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7373
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BIGY Sortino Ratio Rank: 7171
Sortino Ratio Rank
BIGY Omega Ratio Rank: 7373
Omega Ratio Rank
BIGY Calmar Ratio Rank: 6161
Calmar Ratio Rank
BIGY Martin Ratio Rank: 6565
Martin Ratio Rank

RYLD
RYLD Risk / Return Rank: 6666
Overall Rank
RYLD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5959
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RYLD Sortino Ratio Rank: 5959
Sortino Ratio Rank
RYLD Omega Ratio Rank: 6969
Omega Ratio Rank
RYLD Calmar Ratio Rank: 6868
Calmar Ratio Rank
RYLD Martin Ratio Rank: 7373
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BIGY vs. RYLD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for YieldMax Target 12™ Big 50 Option Income ETF (BIGY) and Global X Russell 2000 Covered Call ETF (RYLD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


BIGYRYLDDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.38

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.44

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.44

1.42

+0.02

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.08

3.43

-0.35

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

12.09

13.86

-1.78

BIGY vs. RYLD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BIGY Sharpe Ratio is 2.41, which is comparable to the RYLD Sharpe Ratio of 2.03. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BIGY and RYLD, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


BIGYRYLDDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.41

2.03

+0.38

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.19

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.03

0.32

+0.72

Drawdowns

BIGY vs. RYLD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BIGY drawdown since its inception was -18.93%, smaller than the maximum RYLD drawdown of -41.53%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BIGY and RYLD.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BIGYRYLDDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-18.93%

-41.53%

+22.60%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.34%

-6.29%

-2.05%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-19.05%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-21.33%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.54%

-0.19%

-0.35%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.56%

-8.84%

+6.28%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.12%

1.55%

+0.57%

Volatility

BIGY vs. RYLD - Volatility Comparison

YieldMax Target 12™ Big 50 Option Income ETF (BIGY) has a higher volatility of 2.38% compared to Global X Russell 2000 Covered Call ETF (RYLD) at 2.02%. This indicates that BIGY's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than RYLD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BIGYRYLDDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.38%

2.02%

+0.36%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.72%

7.60%

+0.12%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.67%

10.67%

0.00%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.78%

14.03%

+2.75%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.78%

17.20%

-0.42%

BIGY vs. RYLD - Expense Ratio Comparison

BIGY has a 0.99% expense ratio, which is higher than RYLD's 0.60% expense ratio.


Dividends

BIGY vs. RYLD - Dividend Comparison

BIGY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 12.60%, more than RYLD's 11.65% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019
BIGY
YieldMax Target 12™ Big 50 Option Income ETF
12.60%12.49%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
RYLD
Global X Russell 2000 Covered Call ETF
11.65%12.00%12.03%12.64%13.49%12.35%10.76%6.43%

Frequently Asked Questions


BIGY and RYLD have a correlation of 0.64, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

BIGY has higher volatility (2.38%) compared to RYLD (2.02%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BIGY dropped -18.93% vs RYLD's -41.53%.

On 1-year performance, BIGY leads with 25.59% vs 21.47% for RYLD. On fees, RYLD is cheaper at 0.60% per year. On volatility, RYLD has been the lower-risk option at 2.02%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, BIGY has performed better with a 25.59% return vs 21.47%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

RYLD is cheaper with a 0.60% expense ratio, compared with 0.99% for BIGY.

BIGY has the higher dividend yield at 12.60%, compared with 11.65% for RYLD.

BIGY is categorized as Derivative Income, while RYLD is Hedge Fund. They also come from different issuers: YieldMax and Global X. Their fees differ too: 0.99% for BIGY and 0.60% for RYLD.

BIGY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.41 vs 2.03), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BIGY and RYLD

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer