PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BIGPX vs. FASGX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

BIGPX vs. FASGX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in BlackRock 60/40 Target Allocation Fund Class I (BIGPX) and Fidelity Asset Manager 70% Fund (FASGX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BIGPX achieves a 8.52% return, which is significantly lower than FASGX's 10.20% return. Over the past 10 years, BIGPX has underperformed FASGX with an annualized return of 8.81%, while FASGX has yielded a comparatively higher 10.14% annualized return.


BIGPX

1D
0.06%
1M
-0.51%
YTD
8.52%
6M
7.66%
1Y
18.87%
3Y*
11.40%
5Y*
5.43%
10Y*
8.81%

FASGX

1D
0.15%
1M
-0.57%
YTD
10.20%
6M
9.65%
1Y
22.11%
3Y*
15.75%
5Y*
7.78%
10Y*
10.14%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BIGPX vs. FASGX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
BIGPX
BlackRock 60/40 Target Allocation Fund Class I
8.52%16.08%2.52%15.92%-15.80%7.38%21.62%21.03%-3.65%14.68%
FASGX
Fidelity Asset Manager 70% Fund
10.20%18.23%10.81%16.45%-16.83%13.98%17.19%22.81%-7.65%17.34%

Correlation

The correlation between BIGPX and FASGX is 0.96 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.96

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.92

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.92

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.92

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 26, 2006

0.94

The correlation between BIGPX and FASGX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.92 to 0.96 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BIGPX vs. FASGX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BIGPX
BIGPX Risk / Return Rank: 6666
Overall Rank
BIGPX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6565
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BIGPX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6565
Sortino Ratio Rank
BIGPX Omega Ratio Rank: 6666
Omega Ratio Rank
BIGPX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6262
Calmar Ratio Rank
BIGPX Martin Ratio Rank: 7272
Martin Ratio Rank

FASGX
FASGX Risk / Return Rank: 6868
Overall Rank
FASGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6767
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FASGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6464
Sortino Ratio Rank
FASGX Omega Ratio Rank: 6767
Omega Ratio Rank
FASGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6969
Calmar Ratio Rank
FASGX Martin Ratio Rank: 7575
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BIGPX vs. FASGX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BlackRock 60/40 Target Allocation Fund Class I (BIGPX) and Fidelity Asset Manager 70% Fund (FASGX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


BIGPXFASGXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.03

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.03

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.37

1.37

0.00

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.62

2.78

-0.16

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

11.49

11.97

-0.48

BIGPX vs. FASGX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BIGPX Sharpe Ratio is 1.95, which is comparable to the FASGX Sharpe Ratio of 1.98. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BIGPX and FASGX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

BIGPX vs. FASGX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BIGPX drawdown since its inception was -46.95%, roughly equal to the maximum FASGX drawdown of -47.35%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BIGPX and FASGX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BIGPXFASGXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-46.95%

-47.35%

+0.40%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.27%

-7.95%

+0.68%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-18.04%

-12.80%

-5.24%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-21.88%

-23.54%

+1.66%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-22.34%

-27.20%

+4.86%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.57%

-1.63%

+0.06%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.26%

-6.70%

+0.44%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.65%

1.84%

-0.19%

Volatility

BIGPX vs. FASGX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for BlackRock 60/40 Target Allocation Fund Class I (BIGPX) is 4.27%, while Fidelity Asset Manager 70% Fund (FASGX) has a volatility of 4.90%. This indicates that BIGPX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FASGX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BIGPXFASGXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.27%

4.90%

-0.63%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.51%

9.42%

-0.91%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

9.79%

11.20%

-1.41%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

12.05%

12.42%

-0.37%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

11.39%

12.67%

-1.28%

BIGPX vs. FASGX - Expense Ratio Comparison

BIGPX has a 0.43% expense ratio, which is lower than FASGX's 0.67% expense ratio.


Dividends

BIGPX vs. FASGX - Dividend Comparison

BIGPX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.35%, more than FASGX's 6.66% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BIGPX
BlackRock 60/40 Target Allocation Fund Class I
7.35%7.97%0.00%3.02%2.59%7.60%3.76%3.77%9.80%3.20%1.76%9.89%
FASGX
Fidelity Asset Manager 70% Fund
6.66%7.33%4.60%1.72%6.69%2.73%2.20%5.19%6.31%2.75%0.20%5.58%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.96, BIGPX and FASGX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

FASGX has higher volatility (4.90%) compared to BIGPX (4.27%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BIGPX dropped -46.95% vs FASGX's -47.35%.

FASGX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.98 vs 1.95), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BIGPX and FASGX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer