PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BIDU vs. UAA
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

BIDU vs. UAA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Baidu, Inc. (BIDU) and Under Armour, Inc. (UAA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BIDU achieves a -11.40% return, which is significantly lower than UAA's 21.73% return. Over the past 10 years, BIDU has outperformed UAA with an annualized return of -3.23%, while UAA has yielded a comparatively lower -16.61% annualized return.


BIDU

1D
-0.29%
1M
-14.45%
YTD
-11.40%
6M
-7.39%
1Y
34.62%
3Y*
-6.71%
5Y*
-9.21%
10Y*
-3.23%

UAA

1D
0.67%
1M
18.16%
YTD
21.73%
6M
39.72%
1Y
-8.33%
3Y*
-7.28%
5Y*
-22.39%
10Y*
-16.61%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BIDU vs. UAA - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
BIDU
Baidu, Inc.
-11.40%54.98%-29.20%4.12%-23.13%-31.19%71.08%-20.30%-32.28%42.45%
UAA
Under Armour, Inc.
21.73%-39.98%-5.80%-13.48%-52.05%23.41%-20.51%22.24%22.45%-50.33%

Correlation

The correlation between BIDU and UAA is 0.13, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.13

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.19

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.25

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.27

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 18, 2005

0.30

The correlation between BIDU and UAA shifts across timeframes, from 0.13 (1 year) to 0.30 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

BIDU:

$40.00B

UAA:

$2.58B

EPS

BIDU:

CN¥3.78

UAA:

-$1.16

PS Ratio

BIDU:

2.09

UAA:

0.52

PB Ratio

BIDU:

1.01

UAA:

1.82

Total Revenue (TTM)

BIDU:

CN¥128.51B

UAA:

$4.97B

Gross Profit (TTM)

BIDU:

CN¥54.09B

UAA:

$2.26B

EBITDA (TTM)

BIDU:

CN¥23.17B

UAA:

-$36.44M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BIDU vs. UAA — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BIDU
BIDU Risk / Return Rank: 6262
Overall Rank
BIDU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6464
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BIDU Sortino Ratio Rank: 6363
Sortino Ratio Rank
BIDU Omega Ratio Rank: 6060
Omega Ratio Rank
BIDU Calmar Ratio Rank: 6363
Calmar Ratio Rank
BIDU Martin Ratio Rank: 6262
Martin Ratio Rank

UAA
UAA Risk / Return Rank: 3434
Overall Rank
UAA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3434
Sharpe Ratio Rank
UAA Sortino Ratio Rank: 3434
Sortino Ratio Rank
UAA Omega Ratio Rank: 3434
Omega Ratio Rank
UAA Calmar Ratio Rank: 3535
Calmar Ratio Rank
UAA Martin Ratio Rank: 3636
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BIDU vs. UAA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Baidu, Inc. (BIDU) and Under Armour, Inc. (UAA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


BIDUUAADifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.84

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.20

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.15

1.01

+0.14

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.93

-0.27

+1.20

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.00

-0.42

+2.42

BIDU vs. UAA - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BIDU Sharpe Ratio is 0.63, which is higher than the UAA Sharpe Ratio of -0.21. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BIDU and UAA, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

BIDU vs. UAA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BIDU drawdown since its inception was -77.47%, smaller than the maximum UAA drawdown of -91.99%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BIDU and UAA.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BIDUUAADifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-77.47%

-91.99%

+14.52%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-34.41%

-43.42%

+9.01%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-50.73%

-62.53%

+11.80%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-63.13%

-84.53%

+21.40%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-77.47%

-90.43%

+12.96%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-65.94%

-88.38%

+22.44%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-35.56%

-45.82%

+10.26%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

15.96%

27.44%

-11.48%

Volatility

BIDU vs. UAA - Volatility Comparison

Baidu, Inc. (BIDU) has a higher volatility of 14.89% compared to Under Armour, Inc. (UAA) at 11.61%. This indicates that BIDU's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than UAA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BIDUUAADifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

14.89%

11.61%

+3.28%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

35.91%

43.37%

-7.46%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

50.52%

54.87%

-4.35%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

51.93%

52.74%

-0.81%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

46.30%

52.12%

-5.82%

Dividends

BIDU vs. UAA - Dividend Comparison

Neither BIDU nor UAA has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Financials

BIDU vs. UAA - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Baidu, Inc. and Under Armour, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.005.00B10.00B15.00B20.00B25.00B30.00B35.00B20222023202420252026
31.88B
1.17B
(BIDU) Total Revenue
(UAA) Total Revenue
Please note, different currencies. BIDU values in CNY, UAA values in USD

BIDU vs. UAA - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Baidu, Inc. and Under Armour, Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

40.0%45.0%50.0%20222023202420252026
38.9%
42.0%
Portfolio components
BIDU - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Baidu, Inc. reported a gross profit of 12.41B and revenue of 31.88B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 38.9%.

UAA - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Under Armour, Inc. reported a gross profit of 492.04M and revenue of 1.17B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 42.0%.

BIDU - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Baidu, Inc. reported an operating income of 3.17B and revenue of 31.88B, resulting in an operating margin of 10.0%.

UAA - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Under Armour, Inc. reported an operating income of -33.70M and revenue of 1.17B, resulting in an operating margin of -2.9%.

BIDU - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Baidu, Inc. reported a net income of 3.42B and revenue of 31.88B, resulting in a net margin of 10.7%.

UAA - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Under Armour, Inc. reported a net income of -43.39M and revenue of 1.17B, resulting in a net margin of -3.7%.


Frequently Asked Questions


BIDU and UAA have a correlation of 0.13, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

BIDU has higher volatility (14.89%) compared to UAA (11.61%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BIDU dropped -77.47% vs UAA's -91.99%.

BIDU currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.63 vs -0.21), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BIDU and UAA

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer