PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BIDU vs. ISRG
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

BIDU vs. ISRG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Baidu, Inc. (BIDU) and Intuitive Surgical, Inc. (ISRG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BIDU achieves a -8.85% return, which is significantly higher than ISRG's -26.09% return. Over the past 10 years, BIDU has underperformed ISRG with an annualized return of -3.16%, while ISRG has yielded a comparatively higher 19.37% annualized return.


BIDU

1D
-2.10%
1M
-15.56%
YTD
-8.85%
6M
-8.43%
1Y
38.80%
3Y*
-4.14%
5Y*
-8.60%
10Y*
-3.16%

ISRG

1D
-0.82%
1M
-6.99%
YTD
-26.09%
6M
-26.16%
1Y
-24.86%
3Y*
10.20%
5Y*
8.37%
10Y*
19.37%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BIDU vs. ISRG - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
BIDU
Baidu, Inc.
-8.85%54.98%-29.20%4.12%-23.13%-31.19%71.08%-20.30%-32.28%42.45%
ISRG
Intuitive Surgical, Inc.
-26.09%8.51%54.72%27.14%-26.15%31.76%38.39%23.43%31.23%72.64%

Correlation

The correlation between BIDU and ISRG is 0.13, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.13

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.19

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.25

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.31

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 8, 2005

0.33

The correlation between BIDU and ISRG shifts across timeframes, from 0.13 (1 year) to 0.33 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

BIDU:

$41.15B

ISRG:

$150.62B

EPS

BIDU:

$3.78

ISRG:

$8.24

PE Ratio

BIDU:

31.49

ISRG:

50.80

PEG Ratio

BIDU:

1.43

ISRG:

3.11

PS Ratio

BIDU:

0.32

ISRG:

14.30

PB Ratio

BIDU:

0.15

ISRG:

8.56

Total Revenue (TTM)

BIDU:

$128.51B

ISRG:

$10.58B

Gross Profit (TTM)

BIDU:

$54.09B

ISRG:

$7.02B

EBITDA (TTM)

BIDU:

$23.17B

ISRG:

$3.76B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BIDU vs. ISRG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BIDU
BIDU Risk / Return Rank: 6565
Overall Rank
BIDU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6767
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BIDU Sortino Ratio Rank: 6666
Sortino Ratio Rank
BIDU Omega Ratio Rank: 6363
Omega Ratio Rank
BIDU Calmar Ratio Rank: 6565
Calmar Ratio Rank
BIDU Martin Ratio Rank: 6565
Martin Ratio Rank

ISRG
ISRG Risk / Return Rank: 99
Overall Rank
ISRG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 99
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ISRG Sortino Ratio Rank: 1010
Sortino Ratio Rank
ISRG Omega Ratio Rank: 1111
Omega Ratio Rank
ISRG Calmar Ratio Rank: 1212
Calmar Ratio Rank
ISRG Martin Ratio Rank: 44
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BIDU vs. ISRG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Baidu, Inc. (BIDU) and Intuitive Surgical, Inc. (ISRG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


BIDUISRGDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.58

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+2.59

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.17

0.87

+0.30

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.13

-0.78

+1.91

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.50

-1.60

+4.10

BIDU vs. ISRG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BIDU Sharpe Ratio is 0.77, which is higher than the ISRG Sharpe Ratio of -0.81. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BIDU and ISRG, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


BIDUISRGDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.77

-0.81

+1.58

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.17

0.25

-0.42

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

-0.07

0.60

-0.67

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.23

0.48

-0.25

Drawdowns

BIDU vs. ISRG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BIDU drawdown since its inception was -77.47%, smaller than the maximum ISRG drawdown of -82.26%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BIDU and ISRG.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BIDUISRGDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-77.47%

-82.26%

+4.79%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-34.41%

-32.14%

-2.27%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-50.73%

-34.10%

-16.63%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-63.13%

-49.90%

-13.23%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-77.47%

-49.90%

-27.57%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-64.96%

-31.43%

-33.53%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-35.55%

-21.28%

-14.27%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

15.58%

16.18%

-0.60%

Volatility

BIDU vs. ISRG - Volatility Comparison

Baidu, Inc. (BIDU) has a higher volatility of 17.73% compared to Intuitive Surgical, Inc. (ISRG) at 11.58%. This indicates that BIDU's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ISRG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BIDUISRGDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

17.73%

11.58%

+6.15%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

36.71%

20.48%

+16.23%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

50.60%

31.02%

+19.58%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

51.93%

33.17%

+18.76%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

46.31%

32.39%

+13.92%

Dividends

BIDU vs. ISRG - Dividend Comparison

Neither BIDU nor ISRG has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Financials

BIDU vs. ISRG - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Baidu, Inc. and Intuitive Surgical, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.005.00B10.00B15.00B20.00B25.00B30.00B35.00B20222023202420252026
31.88B
2.77B
(BIDU) Total Revenue
(ISRG) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

BIDU vs. ISRG - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Baidu, Inc. and Intuitive Surgical, Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

35.0%40.0%45.0%50.0%55.0%60.0%65.0%70.0%20222023202420252026
38.9%
66.1%
Portfolio components
BIDU - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Baidu, Inc. reported a gross profit of 12.41B and revenue of 31.88B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 38.9%.

ISRG - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Intuitive Surgical, Inc. reported a gross profit of 1.83B and revenue of 2.77B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 66.1%.

BIDU - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Baidu, Inc. reported an operating income of 3.17B and revenue of 31.88B, resulting in an operating margin of 10.0%.

ISRG - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Intuitive Surgical, Inc. reported an operating income of 855.30M and revenue of 2.77B, resulting in an operating margin of 30.9%.

BIDU - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Baidu, Inc. reported a net income of 3.42B and revenue of 31.88B, resulting in a net margin of 10.7%.

ISRG - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Intuitive Surgical, Inc. reported a net income of 821.50M and revenue of 2.77B, resulting in a net margin of 29.7%.


Frequently Asked Questions


BIDU and ISRG have a correlation of 0.13, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

BIDU has higher volatility (17.73%) compared to ISRG (11.58%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BIDU dropped -77.47% vs ISRG's -82.26%.

BIDU currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.77 vs -0.81), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BIDU and ISRG

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer