PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BIDD vs. TLT
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

BIDD vs. TLT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares International Dividend Active ETF (BIDD) and iShares 20+ Year Treasury Bond ETF (TLT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BIDD achieves a 11.59% return, which is significantly higher than TLT's -0.27% return.


BIDD

1D
-0.89%
1M
6.81%
YTD
11.59%
6M
14.69%
1Y
21.18%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

TLT

1D
-0.40%
1M
0.81%
YTD
-0.27%
6M
-2.02%
1Y
4.93%
3Y*
-1.80%
5Y*
-6.31%
10Y*
-1.66%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BIDD vs. TLT - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
BIDD
iShares International Dividend Active ETF
11.59%20.17%-2.09%
TLT
iShares 20+ Year Treasury Bond ETF
-0.27%4.25%-2.51%

Correlation

The correlation between BIDD and TLT is 0.29, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.29

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 19, 2024

0.24

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BIDD vs. TLT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BIDD
BIDD Risk / Return Rank: 3939
Overall Rank
BIDD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4040
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BIDD Sortino Ratio Rank: 4040
Sortino Ratio Rank
BIDD Omega Ratio Rank: 3939
Omega Ratio Rank
BIDD Calmar Ratio Rank: 3535
Calmar Ratio Rank
BIDD Martin Ratio Rank: 4141
Martin Ratio Rank

TLT
TLT Risk / Return Rank: 1616
Overall Rank
TLT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1616
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TLT Sortino Ratio Rank: 1515
Sortino Ratio Rank
TLT Omega Ratio Rank: 1515
Omega Ratio Rank
TLT Calmar Ratio Rank: 1717
Calmar Ratio Rank
TLT Martin Ratio Rank: 1616
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BIDD vs. TLT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares International Dividend Active ETF (BIDD) and iShares 20+ Year Treasury Bond ETF (TLT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


BIDDTLTDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.89

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.23

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.25

1.09

+0.16

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.73

0.65

+1.07

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.40

1.63

+4.77

BIDD vs. TLT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BIDD Sharpe Ratio is 1.40, which is higher than the TLT Sharpe Ratio of 0.51. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BIDD and TLT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


BIDDTLTDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.40

0.51

+0.89

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.40

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

-0.11

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.16

0.26

+0.90

Drawdowns

BIDD vs. TLT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BIDD drawdown since its inception was -15.08%, smaller than the maximum TLT drawdown of -48.35%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BIDD and TLT.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BIDDTLTDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-15.08%

-48.35%

+33.27%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.32%

-7.58%

-4.74%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-19.18%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-43.70%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-48.35%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.89%

-40.44%

+39.55%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.25%

-13.82%

+11.57%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.32%

3.04%

+0.28%

Volatility

BIDD vs. TLT - Volatility Comparison

iShares International Dividend Active ETF (BIDD) has a higher volatility of 5.95% compared to iShares 20+ Year Treasury Bond ETF (TLT) at 2.76%. This indicates that BIDD's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than TLT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BIDDTLTDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.95%

2.76%

+3.19%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.78%

6.50%

+6.28%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.25%

9.77%

+5.48%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.89%

15.87%

+1.02%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.89%

14.91%

+1.98%

BIDD vs. TLT - Expense Ratio Comparison

BIDD has a 0.59% expense ratio, which is higher than TLT's 0.15% expense ratio.


Dividends

BIDD vs. TLT - Dividend Comparison

BIDD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.48%, less than TLT's 4.59% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BIDD
iShares International Dividend Active ETF
2.48%2.74%0.13%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
TLT
iShares 20+ Year Treasury Bond ETF
4.59%4.43%4.30%3.38%2.67%1.50%1.50%2.27%2.63%2.43%2.60%2.61%

Frequently Asked Questions


BIDD and TLT have a correlation of 0.29, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

BIDD has higher volatility (5.95%) compared to TLT (2.76%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BIDD dropped -15.08% vs TLT's -48.35%.

On 1-year performance, BIDD leads with 21.18% vs 4.93% for TLT. On fees, TLT is cheaper at 0.15% per year. On volatility, TLT has been the lower-risk option at 2.76%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, BIDD has performed better with a 21.18% return vs 4.93%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

TLT is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.59% for BIDD.

TLT has the higher dividend yield at 4.59%, compared with 2.48% for BIDD.

BIDD is categorized as Foreign Large Cap Equities, while TLT is Government Bonds. Their fees differ too: 0.59% for BIDD and 0.15% for TLT.

BIDD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.40 vs 0.51), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BIDD and TLT

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer