BIDD vs. SPDW

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

BIDD (iShares International Dividend Active ETF) and SPDW (SPDR Portfolio World ex-US ETF) are both Foreign Large Cap Equities funds. BIDD is actively managed, while SPDW is passively managed. Over the past year, BIDD returned 21.18% vs 32.15% for SPDW. Their correlation of 0.93 suggests significant overlap in exposure. BIDD charges 0.59%/yr vs 0.04%/yr for SPDW.

Performance

BIDD vs. SPDW - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares International Dividend Active ETF (BIDD) and SPDR Portfolio World ex-US ETF (SPDW). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BIDD achieves a 11.59% return, which is significantly lower than SPDW's 15.00% return.

BIDD

• 1D: -0.89%
• 1M: 6.81%
• YTD: 11.59%
• 6M: 14.69%
• 1Y: 21.18%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

SPDW

• 1D: -0.87%
• 1M: 5.56%
• YTD: 15.00%
• 6M: 18.06%
• 1Y: 32.15%
• 3Y*: 19.77%
• 5Y*: 9.38%
• 10Y*: 10.09%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BIDD vs. SPDW - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
BIDD iShares International Dividend Active ETF	11.59%	20.17%	-2.09%
SPDW SPDR Portfolio World ex-US ETF	15.00%	34.75%	-1.67%

Correlation

The correlation between BIDD and SPDW is 0.94, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.94
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 19, 2024	0.93

The correlation between BIDD and SPDW has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.93 to 0.94 - a consistent structural relationship.

BIDD vs. SPDW - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	BIDD	SPDW
Financial Services	24.9%	22.9%
Technology	20.9%	13.7%
Industrials	17.7%	19.2%
Communication Services	7.2%	3.8%
Consumer Cyclical	7.2%	7.8%
Healthcare	6.4%	8.3%
Basic Materials	6.2%	7.3%
Energy	5.7%	5.5%
Consumer Defensive	3.8%	5.7%
Real Estate	-	2.5%
Utilities	-	3.3%

Return for Risk

BIDD vs. SPDW — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BIDD

BIDD Risk / Return Rank: 39
BIDD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 40
BIDD Sortino Ratio Rank: 40
BIDD Omega Ratio Rank: 39
BIDD Calmar Ratio Rank: 35
BIDD Martin Ratio Rank: 41

SPDW

SPDW Risk / Return Rank: 59
SPDW Sharpe Ratio Rank: 60
SPDW Sortino Ratio Rank: 59
SPDW Omega Ratio Rank: 59
SPDW Calmar Ratio Rank: 55
SPDW Martin Ratio Rank: 60

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BIDD vs. SPDW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares International Dividend Active ETF (BIDD) and SPDR Portfolio World ex-US ETF (SPDW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	BIDD	SPDW	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	1.40	2.07	-0.68
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	2.03	2.87	-0.84
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.25	1.37	-0.12
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.73	2.80	-1.07
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	6.40	10.93	-4.53
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

BIDD vs. SPDW - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BIDD Sharpe Ratio is 1.40, which is lower than the SPDW Sharpe Ratio of 2.07. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BIDD and SPDW, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	BIDD	SPDW	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.40	2.07	-0.68
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	0.57	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	0.59	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	1.16	0.24	+0.92

Drawdowns

BIDD vs. SPDW - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BIDD drawdown since its inception was -15.08%, smaller than the maximum SPDW drawdown of -60.02%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BIDD and SPDW.

Drawdown Indicators

	BIDD	SPDW	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-15.08%	-60.02%	+44.94%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-12.32%	-11.55%	-0.77%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-13.53%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-30.21%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-34.98%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.89%	-0.87%	-0.02%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-2.25%	-12.91%	+10.66%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.32%	2.95%	+0.37%

Volatility

BIDD vs. SPDW - Volatility Comparison

iShares International Dividend Active ETF (BIDD) has a higher volatility of 5.95% compared to SPDR Portfolio World ex-US ETF (SPDW) at 5.63%. This indicates that BIDD's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SPDW based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	BIDD	SPDW	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.95%	5.63%	+0.32%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	12.78%	13.17%	-0.39%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	15.25%	15.60%	-0.35%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	16.89%	16.49%	+0.40%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	16.89%	17.26%	-0.37%

BIDD vs. SPDW - Expense Ratio Comparison

BIDD has a 0.59% expense ratio, which is higher than SPDW's 0.04% expense ratio.

Dividends

BIDD vs. SPDW - Dividend Comparison

BIDD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.48%, less than SPDW's 2.87% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
BIDD iShares International Dividend Active ETF	2.48%	2.74%	0.13%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
SPDW SPDR Portfolio World ex-US ETF	2.87%	3.30%	3.19%	2.75%	3.12%	3.04%	1.87%	3.13%	3.08%	1.86%	3.11%	2.78%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both BIDD and SPDW in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.94, BIDD and SPDW move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which is riskier, BIDD or SPDW?

BIDD has higher volatility (5.95%) compared to SPDW (5.63%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BIDD dropped -15.08% vs SPDW's -60.02%.

Which ETF is better, BIDD or SPDW?

On 1-year performance, SPDW leads with 32.15% vs 21.18% for BIDD. On fees, SPDW is cheaper at 0.04% per year. On volatility, SPDW has been the lower-risk option at 5.63%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, BIDD or SPDW?

Over the 1-year period, SPDW has performed better with a 32.15% return vs 21.18%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, BIDD or SPDW?

SPDW is cheaper with a 0.04% expense ratio, compared with 0.59% for BIDD.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, BIDD or SPDW?

SPDW has the higher dividend yield at 2.87%, compared with 2.48% for BIDD.

What is the main difference between BIDD and SPDW?

They also come from different issuers: iShares and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.59% for BIDD and 0.04% for SPDW.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

SPDW currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.07 vs 1.40), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.