BIDAX vs. FASGX
Compare and contrast key facts about iShares Municipal Bond Index Fund (BIDAX) and Fidelity Asset Manager 70% Fund (FASGX).
BIDAX is managed by BlackRock. It was launched on Dec 17, 2000. FASGX is managed by BlackRock. It was launched on Dec 30, 1991.
Performance
BIDAX vs. FASGX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
BIDAX vs. FASGX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BIDAX iShares Municipal Bond Index Fund | -0.75% | 4.52% | 1.44% | 5.74% | -9.41% | 1.38% | 4.70% | 7.56% | 1.44% |
FASGX Fidelity Asset Manager 70% Fund | -2.99% | 18.23% | 10.81% | 16.45% | -16.83% | 13.98% | 17.19% | 22.81% | -5.23% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BIDAX achieves a -0.75% return, which is significantly higher than FASGX's -2.99% return.
BIDAX
- 1D
- 0.18%
- 1M
- -2.77%
- YTD
- -0.75%
- 6M
- 0.57%
- 1Y
- 3.58%
- 3Y*
- 2.68%
- 5Y*
- 0.54%
- 10Y*
- —
FASGX
- 1D
- -0.24%
- 1M
- -7.42%
- YTD
- -2.99%
- 6M
- -0.12%
- 1Y
- 15.54%
- 3Y*
- 11.72%
- 5Y*
- 6.38%
- 10Y*
- 8.70%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
BIDAX vs. FASGX - Expense Ratio Comparison
BIDAX has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is lower than FASGX's 0.67% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
BIDAX vs. FASGX — Risk / Return Rank
BIDAX
FASGX
BIDAX vs. FASGX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Municipal Bond Index Fund (BIDAX) and Fidelity Asset Manager 70% Fund (FASGX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| BIDAX | FASGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.90 | 1.21 | -0.31 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.22 | 1.73 | -0.51 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.26 | 1.26 | 0.00 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.97 | 1.55 | -0.58 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.38 | 6.89 | -3.51 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| BIDAX | FASGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.90 | 1.21 | -0.31 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.13 | 0.53 | -0.40 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.70 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.48 | 0.60 | -0.12 |
Correlation
The correlation between BIDAX and FASGX is 0.09, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Dividends
BIDAX vs. FASGX - Dividend Comparison
BIDAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.14%, less than FASGX's 7.56% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BIDAX iShares Municipal Bond Index Fund | 3.14% | 4.09% | 3.25% | 2.16% | 1.92% | 2.36% | 2.35% | 3.64% | 0.48% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
FASGX Fidelity Asset Manager 70% Fund | 7.56% | 7.33% | 4.60% | 1.72% | 6.69% | 2.73% | 2.20% | 5.19% | 6.31% | 2.75% | 0.20% | 5.58% |
Drawdowns
BIDAX vs. FASGX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BIDAX drawdown since its inception was -14.39%, smaller than the maximum FASGX drawdown of -47.35%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BIDAX and FASGX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| BIDAX | FASGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -14.39% | -47.35% | +32.96% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -4.83% | -9.07% | +4.24% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -14.39% | -23.54% | +9.15% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -27.20% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.77% | -7.95% | +5.18% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.56% | -6.74% | +3.18% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.39% | 2.04% | -0.65% |
Volatility
BIDAX vs. FASGX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares Municipal Bond Index Fund (BIDAX) is 1.08%, while Fidelity Asset Manager 70% Fund (FASGX) has a volatility of 4.57%. This indicates that BIDAX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FASGX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| BIDAX | FASGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.08% | 4.57% | -3.49% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 1.66% | 7.78% | -6.12% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 4.82% | 12.82% | -8.00% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 4.04% | 12.14% | -8.10% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 4.46% | 12.56% | -8.10% |