PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BIBL vs. VTI
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

BIBL vs. VTI - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Inspire 100 ETF (BIBL) and Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF (VTI). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BIBL achieves a 20.10% return, which is significantly higher than VTI's 8.72% return.


BIBL

1D
-3.23%
1M
0.73%
YTD
20.10%
6M
18.49%
1Y
36.38%
3Y*
20.92%
5Y*
9.44%
10Y*

VTI

1D
-2.68%
1M
0.42%
YTD
8.72%
6M
8.29%
1Y
26.04%
3Y*
21.08%
5Y*
12.19%
10Y*
14.71%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BIBL vs. VTI - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
BIBL
Inspire 100 ETF
20.10%17.27%12.49%17.87%-23.26%27.44%22.62%29.68%-7.64%4.38%
VTI
Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF
8.72%17.10%23.81%26.05%-19.52%25.68%21.08%30.67%-5.23%4.23%

Correlation

The correlation between BIBL and VTI is 0.81, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.81

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.87

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.91

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 1, 2017

0.92

The correlation between BIBL and VTI shifts across timeframes, from 0.81 (1 year) to 0.92 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

BIBL vs. VTI - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
BIBL
VTI

Technology

30.1%
33.5%

Industrials

26.8%
9.8%

Real Estate

14.7%
2.4%

Financial Services

8.3%
12.0%

Energy

6.9%
3.7%

Healthcare

4.3%
9.2%

Basic Materials

4.2%
2.0%

Utilities

3.5%
2.3%

Consumer Defensive

0.5%
4.7%

Consumer Cyclical

0.3%
10.0%

Communication Services

-

10.3%

Technology

BIBL
30.1%
VTI
33.5%

Industrials

BIBL
26.8%
VTI
9.8%

Real Estate

BIBL
14.7%
VTI
2.4%

Financial Services

BIBL
8.3%
VTI
12.0%

Energy

BIBL
6.9%
VTI
3.7%

Healthcare

BIBL
4.3%
VTI
9.2%

Basic Materials

BIBL
4.2%
VTI
2.0%

Utilities

BIBL
3.5%
VTI
2.3%

Consumer Defensive

BIBL
0.5%
VTI
4.7%

Consumer Cyclical

BIBL
0.3%
VTI
10.0%

Communication Services

BIBL

-

VTI
10.3%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BIBL vs. VTI — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BIBL
BIBL Risk / Return Rank: 7777
Overall Rank
BIBL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7474
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BIBL Sortino Ratio Rank: 7171
Sortino Ratio Rank
BIBL Omega Ratio Rank: 7171
Omega Ratio Rank
BIBL Calmar Ratio Rank: 8181
Calmar Ratio Rank
BIBL Martin Ratio Rank: 8686
Martin Ratio Rank

VTI
VTI Risk / Return Rank: 6464
Overall Rank
VTI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6464
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VTI Sortino Ratio Rank: 6161
Sortino Ratio Rank
VTI Omega Ratio Rank: 6363
Omega Ratio Rank
VTI Calmar Ratio Rank: 6060
Calmar Ratio Rank
VTI Martin Ratio Rank: 7373
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BIBL vs. VTI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Inspire 100 ETF (BIBL) and Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF (VTI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


BIBLVTIDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.21

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.25

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.40

1.38

+0.03

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.09

2.93

+1.15

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

17.62

13.45

+4.17

BIBL vs. VTI - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BIBL Sharpe Ratio is 2.31, which is comparable to the VTI Sharpe Ratio of 2.10. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BIBL and VTI, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


BIBLVTIDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.31

2.10

+0.21

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.48

0.70

-0.22

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.81

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.61

0.50

+0.10

Drawdowns

BIBL vs. VTI - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BIBL drawdown since its inception was -36.12%, smaller than the maximum VTI drawdown of -55.45%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BIBL and VTI.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BIBLVTIDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-36.12%

-55.45%

+19.33%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.94%

-8.92%

-0.02%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-20.60%

-19.30%

-1.30%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-30.85%

-25.36%

-5.49%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-35.00%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.23%

-2.93%

-0.30%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.04%

-8.02%

+0.98%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.07%

1.94%

+0.13%

Volatility

BIBL vs. VTI - Volatility Comparison

Inspire 100 ETF (BIBL) has a higher volatility of 5.71% compared to Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) at 3.90%. This indicates that BIBL's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VTI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BIBLVTIDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.71%

3.90%

+1.81%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.07%

9.55%

+3.52%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.82%

12.48%

+3.34%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

19.63%

17.44%

+2.19%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

21.10%

18.32%

+2.78%

BIBL vs. VTI - Expense Ratio Comparison

BIBL has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is higher than VTI's 0.03% expense ratio.


Dividends

BIBL vs. VTI - Dividend Comparison

BIBL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.98%, less than VTI's 1.04% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BIBL
Inspire 100 ETF
0.98%1.01%0.92%1.02%0.98%17.87%1.67%1.30%1.49%0.31%0.00%0.00%
VTI
Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF
1.04%1.12%1.27%1.44%1.66%1.21%1.42%1.78%2.04%1.71%1.92%1.98%

Frequently Asked Questions


BIBL and VTI have a correlation of 0.81, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

BIBL has higher volatility (5.71%) compared to VTI (3.90%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BIBL dropped -36.12% vs VTI's -55.45%.

On 5-year performance, VTI leads with 12.19% vs 9.44% for BIBL. On fees, VTI is cheaper at 0.03% per year. On volatility, VTI has been the lower-risk option at 3.90%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, VTI has performed better with a 12.19% return vs 9.44%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

VTI is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for BIBL.

VTI has the higher dividend yield at 1.04%, compared with 0.98% for BIBL.

BIBL is categorized as Large Cap Growth Equities, while VTI is Large Cap Blend Equities. BIBL tracks Inspire 100 Index, while VTI tracks CRSP US Total Market Index. They also come from different issuers: Inspire and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for BIBL and 0.03% for VTI.

BIBL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.31 vs 2.10), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BIBL and VTI

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer