BIBL vs. VTI

Last updated Jul 18, 2026

BIBL (Inspire 100 ETF) and VTI (Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - BIBL is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the Inspire 100 Index, while VTI is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the CRSP US Total Market Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, BIBL returned 9.81%/yr vs 12.10%/yr for VTI. Their correlation of 0.91 suggests significant overlap in exposure. BIBL charges 0.35%/yr vs 0.03%/yr for VTI.

Performance

BIBL vs. VTI - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Inspire 100 ETF (BIBL) and Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF (VTI). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BIBL achieves a 22.41% return, which is significantly higher than VTI's 10.13% return.

BIBL

• 1D: -0.56%
• 1M: -0.69%
• 6M: 14.50%
• YTD: 22.41%
• 1Y: 32.32%
• 3Y*: 18.36%
• 5Y*: 9.81%
• 10Y*: —

VTI

• 1D: -0.96%
• 1M: 0.63%
• 6M: 8.01%
• YTD: 10.13%
• 1Y: 20.06%
• 3Y*: 18.99%
• 5Y*: 12.10%
• 10Y*: 14.58%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BIBL vs. VTI - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
BIBL Inspire 100 ETF	22.41%	17.27%	12.49%	17.87%	-23.26%	27.44%	22.62%	29.68%	-7.64%	4.42%
VTI Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF	10.13%	17.10%	23.81%	26.05%	-19.52%	25.68%	21.08%	30.67%	-5.23%	4.44%

Correlation

The correlation between BIBL and VTI is 0.80, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.80
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.87
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.91
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 31, 2017	0.91

The correlation between BIBL and VTI shifts across timeframes, from 0.80 (1 year) to 0.91 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

BIBL vs. VTI - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	BIBL	VTI
Technology	30.8%	37.0%
Industrials	26.7%	9.4%
Real Estate	11.3%	2.3%
Financial Services	9.2%	11.3%
Energy	7.9%	3.3%
Basic Materials	5.3%	1.9%
Healthcare	4.2%	9.0%
Utilities	3.3%	2.1%
Consumer Cyclical	0.4%	9.7%
Consumer Defensive	0.2%	4.3%
Communication Services	-	9.8%

Return for Risk

BIBL vs. VTI — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BIBL

BIBL Risk / Return Rank: 78
BIBL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 75
BIBL Sortino Ratio Rank: 72
BIBL Omega Ratio Rank: 70
BIBL Calmar Ratio Rank: 84
BIBL Martin Ratio Rank: 88

VTI

VTI Risk / Return Rank: 59
VTI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 58
VTI Sortino Ratio Rank: 57
VTI Omega Ratio Rank: 56
VTI Calmar Ratio Rank: 56
VTI Martin Ratio Rank: 69

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BIBL vs. VTI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Inspire 100 ETF (BIBL) and Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF (VTI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	BIBL	VTI	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.90	1.57	+0.33
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.58	2.18	+0.40
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.33	1.28	+0.05
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.63	2.26	+1.37
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	14.44	9.88	+4.57

BIBL vs. VTI - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BIBL Sharpe Ratio is 1.90, which is comparable to the VTI Sharpe Ratio of 1.57. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BIBL and VTI, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

BIBL vs. VTI - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BIBL drawdown since its inception was -36.12%, smaller than the maximum VTI drawdown of -55.45%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BIBL and VTI.

Drawdown Indicators

	BIBL	VTI	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-36.12%	-55.45%	+19.33%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-8.94%	-8.92%	-0.02%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-20.60%	-19.30%	-1.30%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-30.85%	-25.36%	-5.49%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-35.00%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-5.13%	-1.68%	-3.45%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-6.97%	-7.99%	+1.02%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.24%	2.04%	+0.20%

Volatility

BIBL vs. VTI - Volatility Comparison

Inspire 100 ETF (BIBL) has a higher volatility of 6.49% compared to Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) at 3.47%. This indicates that BIBL's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VTI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	BIBL	VTI	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	6.49%	3.47%	+3.02%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	14.28%	10.18%	+4.10%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	17.10%	12.86%	+4.24%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	19.87%	17.51%	+2.36%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	21.11%	18.28%	+2.83%

BIBL vs. VTI - Expense Ratio Comparison

BIBL has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is higher than VTI's 0.03% expense ratio.

Dividends

BIBL vs. VTI - Dividend Comparison

BIBL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.94%, less than VTI's 1.06% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
BIBL Inspire 100 ETF	0.94%	1.01%	0.92%	1.02%	0.98%	17.87%	1.67%	1.30%	1.49%	0.31%	0.00%	0.00%
VTI Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF	1.06%	1.12%	1.27%	1.44%	1.66%	1.21%	1.42%	1.78%	2.04%	1.71%	1.92%	1.98%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both BIBL and VTI in my portfolio?

BIBL and VTI have a correlation of 0.80, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, BIBL or VTI?

BIBL has higher volatility (6.49%) compared to VTI (3.47%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BIBL dropped -36.12% vs VTI's -55.45%.

Which ETF is better, BIBL or VTI?

On 5-year performance, VTI leads with 12.10% vs 9.81% for BIBL. On fees, VTI is cheaper at 0.03% per year. On volatility, VTI has been the lower-risk option at 3.47%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, BIBL or VTI?

Over the 5-year period, VTI has performed better with a 12.10% return vs 9.81%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, BIBL or VTI?

VTI is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for BIBL.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, BIBL or VTI?

VTI has the higher dividend yield at 1.06%, compared with 0.94% for BIBL.

What is the main difference between BIBL and VTI?

BIBL is categorized as Large Cap Growth Equities, while VTI is Large Cap Blend Equities. BIBL tracks Inspire 100 Index, while VTI tracks CRSP US Total Market Index. They also come from different issuers: Inspire and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for BIBL and 0.03% for VTI.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

BIBL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.90 vs 1.57), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.