BIAYX vs. GQSCX

Last updated Aug 1, 2026

BIAYX (Brown Advisory Sustainable Small-Cap Core Fund) and GQSCX (Glenmede Quantitative U.S. Small Cap Equity Portfolio) are both Small Cap Blend Equities funds. Over the past 3 years, BIAYX returned 12.48%/yr vs 18.61%/yr for GQSCX. Their correlation of 0.92 means they have usually moved in the same direction. BIAYX charges 1.08%/yr vs 0.85%/yr for GQSCX.

Performance

BIAYX vs. GQSCX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Brown Advisory Sustainable Small-Cap Core Fund (BIAYX) and Glenmede Quantitative U.S. Small Cap Equity Portfolio (GQSCX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BIAYX achieves a 16.68% return, which is significantly lower than GQSCX's 26.14% return.

BIAYX

• 1D: 0.24%
• 1M: -2.12%
• 6M: 12.98%
• YTD: 16.68%
• 1Y: 24.51%
• 3Y*: 12.48%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 5.46%

GQSCX

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: 1.63%
• 6M: 19.84%
• YTD: 26.14%
• 1Y: 53.63%
• 3Y*: 18.61%
• 5Y*: 12.97%
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 12.04%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
BIAYX Brown Advisory Sustainable Small-Cap Core Fund	$0.00	$0.00	$0.00
GQSCX Glenmede Quantitative U.S. Small Cap Equity Portfolio	$0.00	$0.00	$0.00

BIAYX vs. GQSCX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
BIAYX Brown Advisory Sustainable Small-Cap Core Fund	16.68%	9.44%	6.80%	17.39%	-20.21%	1.09%
GQSCX Glenmede Quantitative U.S. Small Cap Equity Portfolio	26.14%	12.22%	11.49%	18.94%	-8.48%	2.87%

Correlation

The correlation between BIAYX and GQSCX is 0.88, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.88
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history.	0.92
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 8, 2021	0.92

The correlation between BIAYX and GQSCX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.88 to 0.92 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

BIAYX vs. GQSCX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

BIAYX

BIAYX Risk / Return Rank: 46
BIAYX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 41
BIAYX Sortino Ratio Rank: 46
BIAYX Omega Ratio Rank: 38
BIAYX Calmar Ratio Rank: 56
BIAYX Martin Ratio Rank: 48

GQSCX

GQSCX Risk / Return Rank: 95
GQSCX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 96
GQSCX Sortino Ratio Rank: 94
GQSCX Omega Ratio Rank: 88
GQSCX Calmar Ratio Rank: 97
GQSCX Martin Ratio Rank: 98

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

BIAYX vs. GQSCX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Brown Advisory Sustainable Small-Cap Core Fund (BIAYX) and Glenmede Quantitative U.S. Small Cap Equity Portfolio (GQSCX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	BIAYX	GQSCX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.31	2.72	-1.41
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.01	3.85	-1.84
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.23	1.46	-0.23
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.09	5.63	-3.54
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	7.17	21.36	-14.19

BIAYX vs. GQSCX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BIAYX Sharpe Ratio is 1.31, which is lower than the GQSCX Sharpe Ratio of 2.72. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BIAYX and GQSCX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

BIAYX vs. GQSCX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BIAYX drawdown since its inception was -31.81%, smaller than the maximum GQSCX drawdown of -46.87%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BIAYX and GQSCX.

Drawdown Indicators

	BIAYX	GQSCX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-31.81%	-46.87%	+15.06%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-11.02%	-8.74%	-2.28%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-23.51%	-28.83%	+5.32%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-28.83%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-2.73%	-0.97%	-1.76%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-12.41%	-8.03%	-4.38%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.21%	2.32%	+0.89%

Volatility

BIAYX vs. GQSCX - Volatility Comparison

Brown Advisory Sustainable Small-Cap Core Fund (BIAYX) has a higher volatility of 4.35% compared to Glenmede Quantitative U.S. Small Cap Equity Portfolio (GQSCX) at 3.29%. This indicates that BIAYX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GQSCX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	BIAYX	GQSCX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.35%	3.29%	+1.06%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	12.98%	12.54%	+0.44%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	17.60%	18.10%	-0.50%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	20.58%	21.75%	-1.17%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	20.58%	24.66%	-4.08%

BIAYX vs. GQSCX - Expense Ratio Comparison

BIAYX has a 1.08% expense ratio, which is higher than GQSCX's 0.85% expense ratio.

Dividends

BIAYX vs. GQSCX - Dividend Comparison

BIAYX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.74%, more than GQSCX's 2.62% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
BIAYX Brown Advisory Sustainable Small-Cap Core Fund	3.74%	4.37%	0.73%	0.01%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
GQSCX Glenmede Quantitative U.S. Small Cap Equity Portfolio	2.62%	3.01%	10.53%	0.70%	9.45%	10.41%	0.51%	0.59%	0.77%	0.14%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both BIAYX and GQSCX in my portfolio?

BIAYX and GQSCX have a correlation of 0.88, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, BIAYX or GQSCX?

BIAYX has higher volatility (4.35%) compared to GQSCX (3.29%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BIAYX dropped -31.81% vs GQSCX's -46.87%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

GQSCX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.72 vs 1.31), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.