PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BIASX vs. BVALX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

BIASX vs. BVALX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Brown Advisory Small-Cap Growth Fund (BIASX) and Brown Advisory - Beutel Goodman Large-Cap Value Fund (BVALX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BIASX achieves a 10.55% return, which is significantly higher than BVALX's 7.65% return.


BIASX

1D
-0.24%
1M
4.59%
YTD
10.55%
6M
11.78%
1Y
18.21%
3Y*
7.64%
5Y*
1.37%
10Y*
9.20%

BVALX

1D
0.19%
1M
5.33%
YTD
7.65%
6M
9.58%
1Y
17.15%
3Y*
11.53%
5Y*
7.42%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BIASX vs. BVALX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
BIASX
Brown Advisory Small-Cap Growth Fund
10.55%2.29%4.29%12.43%-20.27%7.31%31.78%36.26%-5.19%
BVALX
Brown Advisory - Beutel Goodman Large-Cap Value Fund
7.65%5.26%11.49%12.30%2.07%14.73%11.54%31.28%-7.81%

Correlation

The correlation between BIASX and BVALX is 0.78, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.78

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.81

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.80

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 14, 2018

0.76

The correlation between BIASX and BVALX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.76 to 0.81 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BIASX vs. BVALX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BIASX
BIASX Risk / Return Rank: 1717
Overall Rank
BIASX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1515
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BIASX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1616
Sortino Ratio Rank
BIASX Omega Ratio Rank: 1313
Omega Ratio Rank
BIASX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1919
Calmar Ratio Rank
BIASX Martin Ratio Rank: 2222
Martin Ratio Rank

BVALX
BVALX Risk / Return Rank: 1919
Overall Rank
BVALX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1919
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BVALX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2020
Sortino Ratio Rank
BVALX Omega Ratio Rank: 1717
Omega Ratio Rank
BVALX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2020
Calmar Ratio Rank
BVALX Martin Ratio Rank: 2121
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BIASX vs. BVALX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Brown Advisory Small-Cap Growth Fund (BIASX) and Brown Advisory - Beutel Goodman Large-Cap Value Fund (BVALX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


BIASXBVALXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.09

1.26

-0.17

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.68

1.91

-0.24

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.19

1.22

-0.03

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.65

1.68

-0.02

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

5.88

5.63

+0.25

BIASX vs. BVALX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BIASX Sharpe Ratio is 1.09, which is comparable to the BVALX Sharpe Ratio of 1.26. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BIASX and BVALX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


BIASXBVALXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.09

1.26

-0.17

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.07

0.47

-0.40

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.46

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.30

0.56

-0.26

Drawdowns

BIASX vs. BVALX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BIASX drawdown since its inception was -73.26%, which is greater than BVALX's maximum drawdown of -32.88%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BIASX and BVALX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BIASXBVALXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-73.26%

-32.88%

-40.38%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.93%

-10.09%

-0.84%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-24.98%

-19.90%

-5.08%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-30.61%

-19.90%

-10.71%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-38.04%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.47%

0.00%

-0.47%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-23.48%

-4.30%

-19.18%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.07%

3.00%

+0.07%

Volatility

BIASX vs. BVALX - Volatility Comparison

Brown Advisory Small-Cap Growth Fund (BIASX) has a higher volatility of 4.57% compared to Brown Advisory - Beutel Goodman Large-Cap Value Fund (BVALX) at 3.27%. This indicates that BIASX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BVALX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BIASXBVALXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.57%

3.27%

+1.30%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.44%

9.77%

+2.67%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

17.11%

13.44%

+3.67%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

19.79%

15.75%

+4.04%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.95%

18.24%

+1.71%

BIASX vs. BVALX - Expense Ratio Comparison

BIASX has a 1.11% expense ratio, which is higher than BVALX's 0.55% expense ratio.


Dividends

BIASX vs. BVALX - Dividend Comparison

BIASX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 17.75%, more than BVALX's 6.01% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BIASX
Brown Advisory Small-Cap Growth Fund
17.75%19.62%5.78%0.00%8.22%13.22%0.78%4.00%5.17%1.69%3.50%16.77%
BVALX
Brown Advisory - Beutel Goodman Large-Cap Value Fund
6.01%6.47%8.20%1.78%3.62%9.06%3.14%2.95%2.13%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


BIASX and BVALX have a correlation of 0.78, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

BIASX has higher volatility (4.57%) compared to BVALX (3.27%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BIASX dropped -73.26% vs BVALX's -32.88%.

BVALX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.26 vs 1.09), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BIASX and BVALX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer