PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BIASX vs. PXQSX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

BIASX vs. PXQSX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Brown Advisory Small-Cap Growth Fund (BIASX) and Virtus KAR Small-Cap Value Fund (PXQSX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BIASX achieves a 10.55% return, which is significantly higher than PXQSX's 1.87% return. Over the past 10 years, BIASX has outperformed PXQSX with an annualized return of 9.20%, while PXQSX has yielded a comparatively lower 7.53% annualized return.


BIASX

1D
-0.24%
1M
4.59%
YTD
10.55%
6M
11.78%
1Y
18.21%
3Y*
7.64%
5Y*
1.37%
10Y*
9.20%

PXQSX

1D
-0.89%
1M
-2.82%
YTD
1.87%
6M
3.07%
1Y
-0.09%
3Y*
7.29%
5Y*
-0.41%
10Y*
7.53%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BIASX vs. PXQSX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
BIASX
Brown Advisory Small-Cap Growth Fund
10.55%2.29%4.29%12.43%-20.27%7.31%31.78%36.26%-4.47%16.91%
PXQSX
Virtus KAR Small-Cap Value Fund
1.87%-4.50%9.63%19.10%-24.29%19.50%28.16%24.87%-15.95%18.90%

Correlation

The correlation between BIASX and PXQSX is 0.78, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.78

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.82

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.85

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.84

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 30, 2006

0.87

The correlation between BIASX and PXQSX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.78 to 0.87 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BIASX vs. PXQSX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BIASX
BIASX Risk / Return Rank: 1717
Overall Rank
BIASX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1515
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BIASX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1616
Sortino Ratio Rank
BIASX Omega Ratio Rank: 1313
Omega Ratio Rank
BIASX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1919
Calmar Ratio Rank
BIASX Martin Ratio Rank: 2222
Martin Ratio Rank

PXQSX
PXQSX Risk / Return Rank: 22
Overall Rank
PXQSX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 22
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PXQSX Sortino Ratio Rank: 33
Sortino Ratio Rank
PXQSX Omega Ratio Rank: 22
Omega Ratio Rank
PXQSX Calmar Ratio Rank: 22
Calmar Ratio Rank
PXQSX Martin Ratio Rank: 22
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BIASX vs. PXQSX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Brown Advisory Small-Cap Growth Fund (BIASX) and Virtus KAR Small-Cap Value Fund (PXQSX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


BIASXPXQSXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.09

-0.04

+1.13

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.68

0.07

+1.61

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.19

1.01

+0.18

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.65

-0.06

+1.71

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

5.88

-0.12

+6.00

BIASX vs. PXQSX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BIASX Sharpe Ratio is 1.09, which is higher than the PXQSX Sharpe Ratio of -0.04. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BIASX and PXQSX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


BIASXPXQSXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.09

-0.04

+1.13

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.07

-0.02

+0.09

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.46

0.37

+0.09

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.30

0.36

-0.06

Drawdowns

BIASX vs. PXQSX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BIASX drawdown since its inception was -73.26%, which is greater than PXQSX's maximum drawdown of -55.56%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BIASX and PXQSX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BIASXPXQSXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-73.26%

-55.56%

-17.70%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.93%

-13.25%

+2.32%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-24.98%

-22.87%

-2.11%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-30.61%

-31.49%

+0.88%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-38.04%

-37.65%

-0.39%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.47%

-12.46%

+11.99%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-23.48%

-10.29%

-13.19%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.07%

6.21%

-3.14%

Volatility

BIASX vs. PXQSX - Volatility Comparison

Brown Advisory Small-Cap Growth Fund (BIASX) and Virtus KAR Small-Cap Value Fund (PXQSX) have volatilities of 4.57% and 4.75%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BIASXPXQSXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.57%

4.75%

-0.18%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.44%

12.26%

+0.18%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

17.11%

16.78%

+0.33%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

19.79%

20.22%

-0.43%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.95%

20.51%

-0.56%

BIASX vs. PXQSX - Expense Ratio Comparison

BIASX has a 1.11% expense ratio, which is higher than PXQSX's 0.96% expense ratio.


Dividends

BIASX vs. PXQSX - Dividend Comparison

BIASX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 17.75%, more than PXQSX's 5.70% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BIASX
Brown Advisory Small-Cap Growth Fund
17.75%19.62%5.78%0.00%8.22%13.22%0.78%4.00%5.17%1.69%3.50%16.77%
PXQSX
Virtus KAR Small-Cap Value Fund
5.70%5.81%4.90%2.99%3.37%1.76%0.82%0.80%2.54%5.32%8.89%7.58%

Frequently Asked Questions


BIASX and PXQSX have a correlation of 0.78, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

PXQSX has higher volatility (4.75%) compared to BIASX (4.57%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BIASX dropped -73.26% vs PXQSX's -55.56%.

BIASX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.09 vs -0.04), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BIASX and PXQSX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer