BVALX vs. BAFMX

Last updated Jun 23, 2026

BVALX (Brown Advisory - Beutel Goodman Large-Cap Value Fund) and BAFMX (Brown Advisory Mid-Cap Growth Fund) are both mutual funds - BVALX is a Large Cap Value Equities fund managed by Brown Advisory Funds, while BAFMX is a Mid Cap Growth Equities fund managed by Brown Advisory Funds. A 0.71 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. BVALX charges 0.55%/yr vs 0.79%/yr for BAFMX.

Performance

BVALX vs. BAFMX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Brown Advisory - Beutel Goodman Large-Cap Value Fund (BVALX) and Brown Advisory Mid-Cap Growth Fund (BAFMX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

BVALX

• 1D: 0.13%
• 1M: 2.93%
• YTD: 8.89%
• 6M: 8.06%
• 1Y: 18.41%
• 3Y*: 10.85%
• 5Y*: 8.38%
• 10Y*: —

BAFMX

• 1D: —
• 1M: —
• YTD: —
• 6M: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BVALX vs. BAFMX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018
BVALX Brown Advisory - Beutel Goodman Large-Cap Value Fund	8.89%	5.26%	11.49%	12.30%	2.07%	14.73%	11.54%	31.28%	-9.44%
BAFMX Brown Advisory Mid-Cap Growth Fund	-2.65%	3.70%	15.29%	23.21%	-28.12%	6.32%	32.56%	38.63%	-8.59%

Correlation

The correlation between BVALX and BAFMX is 0.63, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.63
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.70
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.72
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 16, 2018	0.71

The correlation between BVALX and BAFMX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.63 to 0.72 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

BVALX vs. BAFMX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BVALX

BVALX Risk / Return Rank: 27
BVALX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 26
BVALX Sortino Ratio Rank: 28
BVALX Omega Ratio Rank: 24
BVALX Calmar Ratio Rank: 27
BVALX Martin Ratio Rank: 28

BAFMX

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BVALX vs. BAFMX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Brown Advisory - Beutel Goodman Large-Cap Value Fund (BVALX) and Brown Advisory Mid-Cap Growth Fund (BAFMX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	BVALX	BAFMX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.37	—	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.06	—	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.24	—	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.83	—	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	6.18	—	—

Drawdowns

Drawdown Indicators

	BVALX	BAFMX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-32.88%	—	—
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-10.09%	—	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-19.90%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-19.90%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.43%	—	—
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-4.28%	—	—
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.99%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	BVALX	BAFMX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.20%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	10.10%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	13.54%	—	—
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	15.79%	—	—
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	18.22%	—	—

BVALX vs. BAFMX - Expense Ratio Comparison

BVALX has a 0.55% expense ratio, which is lower than BAFMX's 0.79% expense ratio.

Dividends

BVALX vs. BAFMX - Dividend Comparison

BVALX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.94%, less than BAFMX's 75.00% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018
BAFMX Brown Advisory Mid-Cap Growth Fund	75.00%	73.01%	0.00%	0.00%	6.85%	9.92%	0.00%	0.52%	1.14%
BVALX Brown Advisory - Beutel Goodman Large-Cap Value Fund	5.94%	6.47%	8.20%	1.78%	3.62%	9.06%	3.14%	2.95%	2.13%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both BVALX and BAFMX in my portfolio?

BVALX and BAFMX have a correlation of 0.63, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.