PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BIASX vs. ETEGX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

BIASX vs. ETEGX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Brown Advisory Small-Cap Growth Fund (BIASX) and Eaton Vance Small-Cap Fund (ETEGX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BIASX achieves a 13.26% return, which is significantly higher than ETEGX's 5.54% return. Over the past 10 years, BIASX has outperformed ETEGX with an annualized return of 9.85%, while ETEGX has yielded a comparatively lower 9.03% annualized return.


BIASX

1D
-0.32%
1M
3.78%
YTD
13.26%
6M
11.23%
1Y
18.34%
3Y*
8.60%
5Y*
1.29%
10Y*
9.85%

ETEGX

1D
-0.28%
1M
4.06%
YTD
5.54%
6M
3.22%
1Y
2.32%
3Y*
6.37%
5Y*
2.69%
10Y*
9.03%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BIASX vs. ETEGX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
BIASX
Brown Advisory Small-Cap Growth Fund
13.26%2.29%4.29%12.43%-20.27%7.31%31.78%36.26%-4.47%16.91%
ETEGX
Eaton Vance Small-Cap Fund
5.54%-6.20%14.65%11.28%-15.52%21.45%12.73%27.57%-6.00%14.87%

Correlation

The correlation between BIASX and ETEGX is 0.83, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.83

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.87

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.89

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.88

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 28, 1999

0.88

The correlation between BIASX and ETEGX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.83 to 0.89 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BIASX vs. ETEGX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BIASX
BIASX Risk / Return Rank: 2222
Overall Rank
BIASX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1818
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BIASX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1919
Sortino Ratio Rank
BIASX Omega Ratio Rank: 1616
Omega Ratio Rank
BIASX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2626
Calmar Ratio Rank
BIASX Martin Ratio Rank: 2929
Martin Ratio Rank

ETEGX
ETEGX Risk / Return Rank: 44
Overall Rank
ETEGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 44
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ETEGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 55
Sortino Ratio Rank
ETEGX Omega Ratio Rank: 44
Omega Ratio Rank
ETEGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 55
Calmar Ratio Rank
ETEGX Martin Ratio Rank: 44
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BIASX vs. ETEGX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Brown Advisory Small-Cap Growth Fund (BIASX) and Eaton Vance Small-Cap Fund (ETEGX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


BIASXETEGXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.87

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.23

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.19

1.05

+0.14

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.78

0.30

+1.48

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.35

0.67

+5.69

BIASX vs. ETEGX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BIASX Sharpe Ratio is 1.12, which is higher than the ETEGX Sharpe Ratio of 0.24. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BIASX and ETEGX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

BIASX vs. ETEGX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BIASX drawdown since its inception was -73.26%, which is greater than ETEGX's maximum drawdown of -67.58%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BIASX and ETEGX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BIASXETEGXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-73.26%

-67.58%

-5.68%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.93%

-13.05%

+2.12%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-24.98%

-19.98%

-5.00%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-30.61%

-24.30%

-6.31%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-38.04%

-36.66%

-1.38%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.32%

-6.81%

+6.49%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-23.43%

-22.74%

-0.69%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.06%

5.89%

-2.83%

Volatility

BIASX vs. ETEGX - Volatility Comparison

Brown Advisory Small-Cap Growth Fund (BIASX) has a higher volatility of 5.10% compared to Eaton Vance Small-Cap Fund (ETEGX) at 4.54%. This indicates that BIASX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ETEGX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BIASXETEGXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.10%

4.54%

+0.56%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.94%

11.40%

+1.54%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

17.47%

16.28%

+1.19%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

19.86%

18.79%

+1.07%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.98%

19.87%

+0.11%

BIASX vs. ETEGX - Expense Ratio Comparison

BIASX has a 1.11% expense ratio, which is lower than ETEGX's 1.21% expense ratio.


Dividends

BIASX vs. ETEGX - Dividend Comparison

BIASX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 17.32%, more than ETEGX's 7.80% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BIASX
Brown Advisory Small-Cap Growth Fund
17.32%19.62%5.78%0.00%8.22%13.22%0.78%4.00%5.17%1.69%3.50%16.77%
ETEGX
Eaton Vance Small-Cap Fund
7.80%8.23%5.13%0.68%3.22%13.87%1.06%7.19%12.29%11.02%13.88%23.25%

Frequently Asked Questions


BIASX and ETEGX have a correlation of 0.83, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

BIASX has higher volatility (5.10%) compared to ETEGX (4.54%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BIASX dropped -73.26% vs ETEGX's -67.58%.

BIASX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.12 vs 0.24), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BIASX and ETEGX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer