BVALX vs. BIAGX

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

BVALX (Brown Advisory - Beutel Goodman Large-Cap Value Fund) and BIAGX (Brown Advisory Growth Equity Fund) are both mutual funds - BVALX is a Large Cap Value Equities fund managed by Brown Advisory Funds, while BIAGX is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund managed by Brown Advisory Funds. Over the past 5 years, BVALX returned 8.05%/yr vs 3.31%/yr for BIAGX. A 0.66 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. BVALX charges 0.55%/yr vs 0.81%/yr for BIAGX.

Performance

BVALX vs. BIAGX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Brown Advisory - Beutel Goodman Large-Cap Value Fund (BVALX) and Brown Advisory Growth Equity Fund (BIAGX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BVALX achieves a 8.75% return, which is significantly higher than BIAGX's 6.22% return.

BVALX

• 1D: -0.13%
• 1M: 2.80%
• YTD: 8.75%
• 6M: 8.14%
• 1Y: 17.60%
• 3Y*: 11.63%
• 5Y*: 8.05%
• 10Y*: —

BIAGX

• 1D: -1.24%
• 1M: 1.27%
• YTD: 6.22%
• 6M: 5.17%
• 1Y: 3.06%
• 3Y*: 11.49%
• 5Y*: 3.31%
• 10Y*: 13.43%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BVALX vs. BIAGX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018
BVALX Brown Advisory - Beutel Goodman Large-Cap Value Fund	8.75%	5.26%	11.49%	12.30%	2.07%	14.73%	11.54%	31.28%	-7.81%
BIAGX Brown Advisory Growth Equity Fund	6.22%	0.61%	16.60%	33.90%	-33.60%	18.56%	32.41%	47.97%	1.58%

Correlation

The correlation between BVALX and BIAGX is 0.56, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.56
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.61
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.67
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 13, 2018	0.66

The correlation between BVALX and BIAGX shifts across timeframes, from 0.56 (1 year) to 0.67 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

BVALX vs. BIAGX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BVALX

BVALX Risk / Return Rank: 27
BVALX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 26
BVALX Sortino Ratio Rank: 28
BVALX Omega Ratio Rank: 24
BVALX Calmar Ratio Rank: 27
BVALX Martin Ratio Rank: 28

BIAGX

BIAGX Risk / Return Rank: 4
BIAGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5
BIAGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5
BIAGX Omega Ratio Rank: 5
BIAGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4
BIAGX Martin Ratio Rank: 4

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BVALX vs. BIAGX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Brown Advisory - Beutel Goodman Large-Cap Value Fund (BVALX) and Brown Advisory Growth Equity Fund (BIAGX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	BVALX	BIAGX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.35	0.27	+1.09
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.05	0.47	+1.58
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.23	1.06	+0.18
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.82	0.20	+1.62
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	6.13	0.49	+5.63

BVALX vs. BIAGX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BVALX Sharpe Ratio is 1.35, which is higher than the BIAGX Sharpe Ratio of 0.27. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BVALX and BIAGX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

BVALX vs. BIAGX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BVALX drawdown since its inception was -32.88%, smaller than the maximum BIAGX drawdown of -56.68%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BVALX and BIAGX.

Drawdown Indicators

	BVALX	BIAGX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-32.88%	-56.68%	+23.80%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-10.09%	-20.56%	+10.47%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-19.90%	-56.68%	+36.78%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-19.90%	-56.68%	+36.78%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-56.68%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.56%	-44.38%	+42.82%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-4.28%	-15.04%	+10.76%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.99%	8.43%	-5.44%

Volatility

BVALX vs. BIAGX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Brown Advisory - Beutel Goodman Large-Cap Value Fund (BVALX) is 4.18%, while Brown Advisory Growth Equity Fund (BIAGX) has a volatility of 6.32%. This indicates that BVALX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BIAGX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	BVALX	BIAGX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.18%	6.32%	-2.14%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	10.10%	12.45%	-2.35%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	13.57%	15.55%	-1.98%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	15.78%	47.31%	-31.53%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	18.21%	36.39%	-18.18%

BVALX vs. BIAGX - Expense Ratio Comparison

BVALX has a 0.55% expense ratio, which is lower than BIAGX's 0.81% expense ratio.

Dividends

BVALX vs. BIAGX - Dividend Comparison

BVALX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.95%, less than BIAGX's 81.44% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
BIAGX Brown Advisory Growth Equity Fund	81.44%	86.50%	91.52%	6.80%	7.75%	13.04%	4.95%	9.82%	12.64%	8.09%	9.13%	6.59%
BVALX Brown Advisory - Beutel Goodman Large-Cap Value Fund	5.95%	6.47%	8.20%	1.78%	3.62%	9.06%	3.14%	2.95%	2.13%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both BVALX and BIAGX in my portfolio?

BVALX and BIAGX have a correlation of 0.56, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, BVALX or BIAGX?

BIAGX has higher volatility (6.32%) compared to BVALX (4.18%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BVALX dropped -32.88% vs BIAGX's -56.68%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

BVALX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.35 vs 0.27), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.