BIAPX vs. JICDX

Last updated Jul 14, 2026

BIAPX (BlackRock 80/20 Target Allocation Fund) and JICDX (John Hancock Funds II Core Bond Fund) are both mutual funds - BIAPX is a Diversified Portfolio fund managed by BlackRock, while JICDX is a Intermediate Core Bond fund managed by John Hancock. Over the past 10 years, BIAPX returned 10.36%/yr vs 1.03%/yr for JICDX. At a correlation of -0.11, they often move in opposite directions. BIAPX charges 0.10%/yr vs 0.66%/yr for JICDX.

Performance

BIAPX vs. JICDX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in BlackRock 80/20 Target Allocation Fund (BIAPX) and John Hancock Funds II Core Bond Fund (JICDX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BIAPX achieves a 11.93% return, which is significantly higher than JICDX's -0.67% return. Over the past 10 years, BIAPX has outperformed JICDX with an annualized return of 10.36%, while JICDX has yielded a comparatively lower 1.03% annualized return.

BIAPX

• 1D: 0.29%
• 1M: 1.11%
• 6M: 9.25%
• YTD: 11.93%
• 1Y: 22.33%
• 3Y*: 14.70%
• 5Y*: 7.70%
• 10Y*: 10.36%

JICDX

• 1D: -0.09%
• 1M: -0.31%
• 6M: -0.85%
• YTD: -0.67%
• 1Y: 1.32%
• 3Y*: 3.48%
• 5Y*: -0.73%
• 10Y*: 1.03%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BIAPX vs. JICDX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
BIAPX BlackRock 80/20 Target Allocation Fund	11.93%	18.33%	5.46%	19.20%	-16.15%	14.95%	19.50%	24.72%	-7.62%	17.47%
JICDX John Hancock Funds II Core Bond Fund	-0.67%	5.57%	1.42%	5.77%	-13.68%	-2.01%	8.40%	8.21%	-0.54%	3.24%

Correlation

The correlation between BIAPX and JICDX is 0.36, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.36
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.30
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.24
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.09
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 26, 2006	-0.11

The correlation between BIAPX and JICDX shifts across timeframes, from -0.11 (all time) to 0.36 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

BIAPX vs. JICDX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BIAPX

BIAPX Risk / Return Rank: 69
BIAPX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 67
BIAPX Sortino Ratio Rank: 67
BIAPX Omega Ratio Rank: 65
BIAPX Calmar Ratio Rank: 68
BIAPX Martin Ratio Rank: 79

JICDX

JICDX Risk / Return Rank: 6
JICDX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6
JICDX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6
JICDX Omega Ratio Rank: 6
JICDX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7
JICDX Martin Ratio Rank: 6

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BIAPX vs. JICDX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BlackRock 80/20 Target Allocation Fund (BIAPX) and John Hancock Funds II Core Bond Fund (JICDX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	BIAPX	JICDX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.81	0.33	+1.48
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.56	0.47	+2.09
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.33	1.06	+0.27
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.54	0.42	+2.12
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	11.21	0.96	+10.25

BIAPX vs. JICDX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BIAPX Sharpe Ratio is 1.81, which is higher than the JICDX Sharpe Ratio of 0.33. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BIAPX and JICDX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

BIAPX vs. JICDX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BIAPX drawdown since its inception was -53.40%, which is greater than JICDX's maximum drawdown of -18.94%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BIAPX and JICDX.

Drawdown Indicators

	BIAPX	JICDX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-53.40%	-18.94%	-34.46%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-8.64%	-3.47%	-5.17%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-20.90%	-6.37%	-14.53%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-23.29%	-18.61%	-4.68%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-27.13%	-18.94%	-8.19%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.76%	-4.86%	+4.10%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-7.96%	-2.94%	-5.02%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.95%	1.46%	+0.49%

Volatility

BIAPX vs. JICDX - Volatility Comparison

BlackRock 80/20 Target Allocation Fund (BIAPX) has a higher volatility of 4.77% compared to John Hancock Funds II Core Bond Fund (JICDX) at 1.20%. This indicates that BIAPX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than JICDX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	BIAPX	JICDX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.77%	1.20%	+3.57%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	10.57%	3.07%	+7.50%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	12.15%	4.51%	+7.64%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	14.69%	6.16%	+8.53%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	14.03%	5.01%	+9.02%

BIAPX vs. JICDX - Expense Ratio Comparison

BIAPX has a 0.10% expense ratio, which is lower than JICDX's 0.66% expense ratio.

Dividends

BIAPX vs. JICDX - Dividend Comparison

BIAPX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.34%, more than JICDX's 2.08% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
BIAPX BlackRock 80/20 Target Allocation Fund	5.34%	5.98%	0.00%	4.28%	2.30%	6.04%	2.07%	2.49%	6.26%	3.12%	1.67%	13.86%
JICDX John Hancock Funds II Core Bond Fund	2.08%	2.85%	4.25%	3.66%	2.34%	1.74%	6.47%	3.38%	2.69%	2.03%	2.44%	1.72%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both BIAPX and JICDX in my portfolio?

BIAPX and JICDX have a correlation of 0.36, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, BIAPX or JICDX?

BIAPX has higher volatility (4.77%) compared to JICDX (1.20%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BIAPX dropped -53.40% vs JICDX's -18.94%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

BIAPX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.81 vs 0.33), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.