JICDX vs. JIBCX
JICDX (John Hancock Funds II Core Bond Fund) and JIBCX (John Hancock Funds II Blue Chip Growth Fund) are both mutual funds - JICDX is a Intermediate Core Bond fund managed by John Hancock, while JIBCX is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund managed by John Hancock. Over the past 10 years, JICDX returned 1.01%/yr vs 14.12%/yr for JIBCX. Their -0.12 correlation means they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. JICDX charges 0.66%/yr vs 0.81%/yr for JIBCX.
Performance
JICDX vs. JIBCX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, JICDX achieves a -0.77% return, which is significantly higher than JIBCX's -3.11% return. Over the past 10 years, JICDX has underperformed JIBCX with an annualized return of 1.01%, while JIBCX has yielded a comparatively higher 14.12% annualized return.
JICDX
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- -0.55%
- 6M
- -0.95%
- YTD
- -0.77%
- 1Y
- 1.04%
- 3Y*
- 3.19%
- 5Y*
- -0.88%
- 10Y*
- 1.01%
- ALL TIME*
- 3.05%
JIBCX
- 1D
- 2.32%
- 1M
- -2.61%
- 6M
- -1.17%
- YTD
- -3.11%
- 1Y
- -6.06%
- 3Y*
- 15.16%
- 5Y*
- 6.01%
- 10Y*
- 14.12%
- ALL TIME*
- 11.18%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $0.00 | $0.00 | $0.00 | |
| $0.00 | $0.00 | $0.00 |
JICDX vs. JIBCX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
JICDX John Hancock Funds II Core Bond Fund | -0.77% | 5.57% | 1.42% | 5.77% | -13.68% | -2.01% | 8.40% | 8.21% | -0.54% | 3.24% |
JIBCX John Hancock Funds II Blue Chip Growth Fund | -3.11% | 8.28% | 35.89% | 49.47% | -38.12% | 16.88% | 34.25% | 29.71% | 1.72% | 36.25% |
Correlation
The correlation between JICDX and JIBCX is 0.30, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.30 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.19 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.17 |
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions. | 0.05 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 14, 2005 | -0.12 |
The correlation between JICDX and JIBCX shifts across timeframes, from -0.12 (all time) to 0.30 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
JICDX vs. JIBCX — Risk / Return Rank
JICDX
JIBCX
JICDX vs. JIBCX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for John Hancock Funds II Core Bond Fund (JICDX) and John Hancock Funds II Blue Chip Growth Fund (JIBCX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| JICDX | JIBCX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.55 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.64 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.05 | 0.97 | +0.08 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.33 | -0.24 | +0.56 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.70 | -0.51 | +1.21 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
JICDX vs. JIBCX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum JICDX drawdown since its inception was -18.94%, smaller than the maximum JIBCX drawdown of -54.15%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JICDX and JIBCX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| JICDX | JIBCX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -18.94% | -54.15% | +35.21% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -3.47% | -24.47% | +21.00% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -5.17% | -24.47% | +19.30% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -18.61% | -42.74% | +24.13% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -18.94% | -42.74% | +23.80% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -4.94% | -14.02% | +9.08% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.95% | -9.29% | +6.34% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.58% | 10.72% | -9.14% |
Volatility
JICDX vs. JIBCX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for John Hancock Funds II Core Bond Fund (JICDX) is 0.74%, while John Hancock Funds II Blue Chip Growth Fund (JIBCX) has a volatility of 5.97%. This indicates that JICDX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than JIBCX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| JICDX | JIBCX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.74% | 5.97% | -5.23% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 3.03% | 14.51% | -11.48% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 4.38% | 20.17% | -15.79% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 6.15% | 24.76% | -18.61% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 5.00% | 23.12% | -18.12% |
JICDX vs. JIBCX - Expense Ratio Comparison
JICDX has a 0.66% expense ratio, which is lower than JIBCX's 0.81% expense ratio.
Dividends
JICDX vs. JIBCX - Dividend Comparison
JICDX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.08%, while JIBCX has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
JIBCX John Hancock Funds II Blue Chip Growth Fund | 0.00% | 0.00% | 6.97% | 3.23% | 5.57% | 16.46% | 4.72% | 1.46% | 7.73% | 16.16% | 6.35% | 13.20% |
JICDX John Hancock Funds II Core Bond Fund | 2.08% | 2.85% | 4.25% | 3.66% | 2.34% | 1.74% | 6.47% | 3.38% | 2.69% | 2.03% | 2.44% | 1.72% |
Frequently Asked Questions
JICDX and JIBCX have a correlation of 0.30, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
JIBCX has higher volatility (5.97%) compared to JICDX (0.74%). In terms of maximum drawdown, JICDX dropped -18.94% vs JIBCX's -54.15%.
JICDX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.26 vs -0.29), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for JICDX and JIBCX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer