PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BGX vs. JAKVX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

BGX vs. JAKVX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Blackstone Long-Short Credit Income Fund (BGX) and John Hancock Disciplined Value Global Long/Short Fund Class R6 (JAKVX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BGX achieves a -4.51% return, which is significantly lower than JAKVX's 12.93% return.


BGX

1D
-0.18%
1M
-0.27%
YTD
-4.51%
6M
-4.72%
1Y
-2.96%
3Y*
10.10%
5Y*
3.40%
10Y*
6.16%

JAKVX

1D
-0.49%
1M
1.00%
YTD
12.93%
6M
13.88%
1Y
26.35%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BGX vs. JAKVX - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between BGX and JAKVX is 0.24, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.24

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 29, 2025

0.25

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BGX vs. JAKVX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BGX
BGX Risk / Return Rank: 22
Overall Rank
BGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 11
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 11
Sortino Ratio Rank
BGX Omega Ratio Rank: 11
Omega Ratio Rank
BGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 22
Calmar Ratio Rank
BGX Martin Ratio Rank: 22
Martin Ratio Rank

JAKVX
JAKVX Risk / Return Rank: 9494
Overall Rank
JAKVX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9797
Sharpe Ratio Rank
JAKVX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9595
Sortino Ratio Rank
JAKVX Omega Ratio Rank: 9393
Omega Ratio Rank
JAKVX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9393
Calmar Ratio Rank
JAKVX Martin Ratio Rank: 9191
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BGX vs. JAKVX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Blackstone Long-Short Credit Income Fund (BGX) and John Hancock Disciplined Value Global Long/Short Fund Class R6 (JAKVX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


BGXJAKVXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-3.98

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-5.62

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.94

1.72

-0.78

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.24

5.22

-5.46

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-0.50

18.35

-18.85

BGX vs. JAKVX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BGX Sharpe Ratio is -0.37, which is lower than the JAKVX Sharpe Ratio of 3.61. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BGX and JAKVX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


BGXJAKVXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.37

3.61

-3.98

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.29

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.35

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.28

4.00

-3.72

Drawdowns

BGX vs. JAKVX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BGX drawdown since its inception was -47.40%, which is greater than JAKVX's maximum drawdown of -5.16%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BGX and JAKVX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BGXJAKVXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-47.40%

-5.16%

-42.24%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.43%

-5.16%

-7.27%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-14.08%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-25.94%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-47.40%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-8.17%

-0.71%

-7.46%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.99%

-0.80%

-6.19%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.90%

1.47%

+4.43%

Volatility

BGX vs. JAKVX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Blackstone Long-Short Credit Income Fund (BGX) is 1.42%, while John Hancock Disciplined Value Global Long/Short Fund Class R6 (JAKVX) has a volatility of 2.50%. This indicates that BGX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than JAKVX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BGXJAKVXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.42%

2.50%

-1.08%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

5.95%

5.91%

+0.04%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

7.97%

7.48%

+0.49%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

11.79%

7.33%

+4.46%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.54%

7.33%

+10.21%

BGX vs. JAKVX - Expense Ratio Comparison

BGX has a 1.46% expense ratio, which is lower than JAKVX's 1.54% expense ratio.


Dividends

BGX vs. JAKVX - Dividend Comparison

BGX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.06%, more than JAKVX's 7.50% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BGX
Blackstone Long-Short Credit Income Fund
9.06%8.87%9.89%11.71%8.15%7.01%8.76%9.35%11.74%7.12%9.01%8.72%
JAKVX
John Hancock Disciplined Value Global Long/Short Fund Class R6
7.50%8.47%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


BGX and JAKVX have a correlation of 0.24, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

JAKVX has higher volatility (2.50%) compared to BGX (1.42%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BGX dropped -47.40% vs JAKVX's -5.16%.

JAKVX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.61 vs -0.37), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BGX and JAKVX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer