PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BGUK.L vs. JUP.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

BGUK.L vs. JUP.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in Baillie Gifford UK Growth Fund plc (BGUK.L) and Jupiter Fund Management plc (JUP.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BGUK.L achieves a 2.94% return, which is significantly lower than JUP.L's 11.31% return. Over the past 10 years, BGUK.L has outperformed JUP.L with an annualized return of 5.81%, while JUP.L has yielded a comparatively lower -2.26% annualized return.


BGUK.L

1D
0.00%
1M
-0.47%
YTD
2.94%
6M
2.44%
1Y
9.91%
3Y*
10.76%
5Y*
-0.44%
10Y*
5.81%

JUP.L

1D
2.94%
1M
6.07%
YTD
11.31%
6M
17.54%
1Y
94.76%
3Y*
23.36%
5Y*
-2.30%
10Y*
-2.26%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BGUK.L vs. JUP.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
BGUK.L
Baillie Gifford UK Growth Fund plc
2.94%17.54%11.15%2.25%-29.88%8.18%12.73%28.68%-5.18%9.73%
JUP.L
Jupiter Fund Management plc
11.31%91.85%0.89%-25.11%-42.29%-2.40%-25.86%50.47%-49.66%51.56%

Correlation

The correlation between BGUK.L and JUP.L is 0.53, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.53

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.53

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.52

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.46

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 17, 2010

0.47

The correlation between BGUK.L and JUP.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.46 to 0.53 - a consistent structural relationship.

Fundamentals

Total Revenue (TTM)

BGUK.L:

£23.80M

JUP.L:

£838.00M

Gross Profit (TTM)

BGUK.L:

£24.70M

JUP.L:

£760.80M

EBITDA (TTM)

BGUK.L:

-£21.08M

JUP.L:

£242.30M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BGUK.L vs. JUP.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BGUK.L
BGUK.L Risk / Return Rank: 5959
Overall Rank
BGUK.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6363
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BGUK.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 5656
Sortino Ratio Rank
BGUK.L Omega Ratio Rank: 5454
Omega Ratio Rank
BGUK.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 5858
Calmar Ratio Rank
BGUK.L Martin Ratio Rank: 6565
Martin Ratio Rank

JUP.L
JUP.L Risk / Return Rank: 9393
Overall Rank
JUP.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9494
Sharpe Ratio Rank
JUP.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 9595
Sortino Ratio Rank
JUP.L Omega Ratio Rank: 9393
Omega Ratio Rank
JUP.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 9191
Calmar Ratio Rank
JUP.L Martin Ratio Rank: 9090
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BGUK.L vs. JUP.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Baillie Gifford UK Growth Fund plc (BGUK.L) and Jupiter Fund Management plc (JUP.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


BGUK.LJUP.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-2.34

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-3.03

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.13

1.50

-0.37

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.77

4.94

-4.17

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.58

12.08

-9.50

BGUK.L vs. JUP.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BGUK.L Sharpe Ratio is 0.67, which is lower than the JUP.L Sharpe Ratio of 3.00. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BGUK.L and JUP.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


BGUK.LJUP.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.67

3.00

-2.34

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.02

-0.06

+0.04

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.28

-0.07

+0.34

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.24

0.17

+0.07

Drawdowns

BGUK.L vs. JUP.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BGUK.L drawdown since its inception was -60.77%, smaller than the maximum JUP.L drawdown of -81.45%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BGUK.L and JUP.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BGUK.LJUP.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-60.77%

-81.45%

+20.68%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.80%

-19.36%

+6.56%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-19.34%

-32.20%

+12.86%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-43.21%

-69.90%

+26.69%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-43.69%

-81.45%

+37.76%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-8.49%

-49.20%

+40.71%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-17.03%

-33.94%

+16.91%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.83%

7.94%

-4.11%

Volatility

BGUK.L vs. JUP.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Baillie Gifford UK Growth Fund plc (BGUK.L) is 5.61%, while Jupiter Fund Management plc (JUP.L) has a volatility of 8.19%. This indicates that BGUK.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than JUP.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BGUK.LJUP.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.61%

8.19%

-2.58%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.21%

23.01%

-10.80%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.77%

31.86%

-17.09%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

19.68%

36.49%

-16.81%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.94%

34.17%

-13.23%

Dividends

BGUK.L vs. JUP.L - Dividend Comparison

BGUK.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.71%, less than JUP.L's 6.02% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BGUK.L
Baillie Gifford UK Growth Fund plc
2.71%2.79%3.14%2.17%2.36%1.00%1.37%2.18%3.69%3.05%3.12%3.85%
JUP.L
Jupiter Fund Management plc
6.02%2.71%7.61%7.39%12.88%7.84%6.06%6.96%11.42%4.69%5.86%5.53%

Financials

BGUK.L vs. JUP.L - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Baillie Gifford UK Growth Fund plc and Jupiter Fund Management plc. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


-100.00M0.00100.00M200.00M300.00M400.00MJulyOctober2022AprilJulyOctober2023AprilJulyOctober2024AprilJulyOctober2025AprilJulyOctober
-3.01M
302.90M
(BGUK.L) Total Revenue
(JUP.L) Total Revenue
Values in GBp except per share items

Frequently Asked Questions


BGUK.L and JUP.L have a correlation of 0.53, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BGUK.L and JUP.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer